In my last article I suggested that the increase in Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere was coming from natural sources, NOT from human sources. Humans supply a very meagre 4% of the CO2 in the atmosphere, whereas 96% comes from natural sources. The oceans hold most of the natural CO2. The oceans are warming and warm water holds less CO2 than cold water. So as the oceans warm, more CO2 is emitted into the atmosphere.
While the sun is the main contributor of the earth’s heat, the oceans could also be warmed by the underwater thermal activities. More than 70% of all volcanic eruptions occur underwater. At this point in time the exact number of undersea events in unknown, but it is a very large number. When considering climate change, the heat coming from the deep earth has a significant long term impact and can’t be ignored due to the water in the oceans having a large specific heat capacity. The specific heat of a substance is the amount of heat energy needed to raise the temperature of 1gm of the substance by 1 deg C. The heat capacity of water is 4.186 Joules which is quite high. It means too that a certain mass of water will take longer time to cool once it is heated.
Many scientists are now beginning to look back and see how the earth’s climate system has changed in the past in order to improve their understanding of how it may behave in the future. It is now clear from these studies that abrupt warming events are built into Earth’s climate system.
In a recently published study, Professor Lowell Scott, Katie Harazin and Nadine Krupinski discovered that at the end of the last glacial era about 20,000 years ago, Carbon Dioxide was released into the ocean from geologic reservoirs located on the sea floor when oceans began to warm. Note that the warming came first, then the release of Carbon Dioxide. Naturally occurring reservoirs of Carbon Dioxide in the modern oceans could be disturbed again.
One of the best known examples of rapid warming causing the release of geologic Carbon Dioxide is the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, a major global warming event that occurred about 55 million years ago. During this time, the Earth warmed by between 5 and 9 deg C within about 10,000 years. Climate scientists now consider the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum to be an analog for environmental changes taking place today. The PETM happened over a longer period without human involvement, but it shows there is inherent instability in the climate system.
Hundreds of scientific studies have failed to establish what caused the rapid Carbon Dioxide increases that ended the ice age. Researchers agree that the ocean must be involved because it is a large Carbon Dioxide storage system regulating the amount of Carbon Dioxide that resides in the atmosphere.
Climate alarmists claim that human emissions of Carbon Dioxide have warmed the Earth’s oceans since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. However, overwhelming amounts of reliable information taken from hundreds of research studies, show that emissions of superheated fluids and gases from the estimated 10 million ocean floor geological features including hydrothermal vents, are responsible for warming Earth’s oceans-not human activities.
In 1977 scientists exploring the Galapagos rift along the mid-ocean ridge in the Eastern Pacific, noticed a number of temperature spikes. Temperatures changing from near freezing to 400 deg C in a short distance. They had discovered deep-sea hydrothermal vents. These are like geysers on the sea floor. Along mid ocean ridges where tectonic plates spread apart, magma (molten lava), rises out of these vents. This magma is superheated at temperatures which can melt metal. Further, these vents have been found to be active in quite shallow water. Hydrothermal vents have been found all over the oceans, including regions of the Pacific, Atlantic, Indian and Southern and Arctic oceans.
Over the past two decades, ocean scientists have discovered that there are reservoirs of liquid and solid Carbon Dioxide accumulating at the bottom of the ocean, within the rocks and sediments on the margins of active hydrothermal vents. At these sites, volcanic magma from within the Earth meets superheated water producing plumes of Carbon Dioxide rich fluids that filter through crevices in the Earth’s crust, migrating upwards towards the surface.
When a plume of this fluid meets cold seawater, the Carbon Dioxide can solidify into a form called hydrate. The hydrate forms a cap which prevents further Carbon Dioxide from entering the ocean. But at temperatures above approximately 9 Deg C, hydrate will melt releasing liquid or gaseous Carbon Dioxide into the water. So warming come first, then release of CO2. Reservoirs of hydrate have been documented in the Western Pacific and in the Aegean Sea. In shallower water where ocean temperatures are warmer and pressure is lower, researchers have observed pure Carbon Dioxide emanating directly from sediments as a gas and rising to the ocean’s surface.
So here we are with Carbon Dioxide in shallow water being released from sediments and rising to the ocean surface and then into the atmosphere. As the oceans warm, more and more Carbon Dioxide will be released. There is virtually no data as to how much Carbon Dioxide is released from these reservoirs in the ocean. But these types of reservoir have the capacity to release vast amounts of Carbon Dioxide when they are disturbed.
The oceans are warming. As these warm water sink into the oceans interior they transport excess heat towards sites of Carbon Dioxide reservoirs. These warmer waters will eventually destabilise the hydrate seals that keep liquid Carbon Dioxide trapped. Earth’s pre-historic record clearly demonstrates that geologic reservoirs can be destabilised and that when they are, it leads to rapid increases in atmospheric Carbon Dioxide.
Here’s something interesting. There’s a headline in Nature
Climate Change, dated 12th June 2017, written by four presumably
Chinese scientists, Yao et al, and the headline says:
Distinct global warming
rate tied to multiple ocean surface temperatures.
The globally averaged surface temperatures have shown
multi-decadal fluctuations since 1900, characterised by two weaker slowdowns
and two stronger accelerations. The recent global warming hiatus has been
ascribed to the mid Eastern Pacific cooling but the causes for the previous coolings are unclear.
There is a cooling at the start of 1900 then another from the mid 1940’s to about 1960 then finally entering the hiatus and slight cooling from about 2000. This slight cooling may still be going.
In the research summary they say this: Our results reveal distinct impacts of individual basin sea surface temperature changes on the global warming rates between the acceleration and slowdown periods. In the acceleration cases the sea surface temperature warming in all the oceans acts jointly to generate strong global warming rates. In contrast, in the slowdown cases the global cooling induced by the tropical Pacific cooling is reduced or negated by the warming effects in the other oceans.
Thus it is the sea surface changes in multiple oceans, not merely those in the tropical Pacific, that are crucial to determine the global warming rates. Note that the change in the ocean temperature comes first followed by the change in global temperature rates. It seems the oceans play an important part in controlling the global temperature in addition to controlling the amount of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere. Oh, and we have periods of cooling of the earth while Carbon Dioxide continues to rise. This doesn’t fit in with what the climate alarmists say does it?
It seems highly likely that the increase in carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere in recent times is not coming from the very small amount humans emit, but from the warming of the oceans- the greatest storage system for Carbon Dioxide.
3 comments:
Another excuse for doing nothing. What will they come up with next?
Krauser the German atmospheric physicist who won the Nobel prize in 2022 for his work has very similar views to those of Mr Bradford.
Though I'm sure our Chloe will prove them both wrong.
She says they must be giving Nobel prizes to just anyone these days.
Well done Ian. Although the main driver of the earth's heat is the sun there is almost certainly an effect from other sources but difficult to quantify.
If we were to define an experiment to test if humans affect the CO2 concentration we would shut down most of human CO2 producing activities and see if it had any effect. Well, this is exactly what the Chinese Communist Party and others did in Wuhan : an experiment lasting two years and the result ? CO2 kept increasing ! QED. Unfortunately people like Ewan blindly accept what the MSM pump out with , apparently , no analytical input of their own whatsoever.
Gerry
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.