ACT MP Todd Stephenson writes:
Last year, protestors at Albert Park assaulted women attending a speech on gender issues, and effectively chased the controversial speaker off stage.
And recently in Wellington, a US diplomat was forced to abandon a talk on international security due to disruption from pro-Palestine protestors.
Activists have celebrated these cancellations, but ACT has warned time and time again that the same tactics could easily be turned against the political left.
And now it’s happening.
Destiny Church, who oppose rainbow story time events, have successfully shut down two events with the threat of protest, and even vandalised a public crossing. Hastings District Council said they could no longer guarantee the safety of attendees.
It is sad, but no surprise, that Destiny Church has adopted the tactics of the left to shut down events they disapprove of.
We need a more principled approach that respects the freedoms of left and right, conservative and progressive.
If the “woke” left wants to stop reactionary speakers, they ought to prove those speakers are breaking laws – such as by inciting violence.
If conservatives want to stop rainbow events, they ought to prove that children are being put at risk – and take those concerns to police.
If protestors on either side of politics believe current laws are inadequate at protecting the rights of the vulnerable, they need to propose specific law changes that can be scrutinised and discussed.
I agree, of course.
David Farrar runs Curia Market Research, a specialist opinion polling and research agency, and the popular Kiwiblog where this article was sourced. He previously worked in the Parliament for eight years, serving two National Party Prime Ministers and three Opposition Leaders.
2 comments:
David I consider myself a balanced reasonable person who also agrees with you and Todd on this.
I wonder how many lefties agree with this however?
They are certainly up in arms over the rainbow crossing incident but are celebrating shutting events down. As much as it pains me to say this as we would be stooping to the lefts gutter level , but how else do you get the left to understand it works both ways. Like Trump once said ( something along the lines of) you have to use force that all these people understand.
Until the left drag themselves out of the gutter, this is the new norm.
Yes I agree.
However I do not agree with the women's rights person being described as "the controversial speaker".
It is the radicals and ratbags who abused her and her supporters that are controversial.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.