Poverty can be measured in various ways.
Material hardship is measured by asking survey questions about deprivation. Has a child gone without fresh fruit and veges, been subject to postponed doctor visits, experienced a cold and damp house, etc. The DEP-17 scale has 17 items and experience of 6+ is considered material hardship; 9 or more, severe hardship.
The following graph shows that children in beneficiary households experience material hardship at rates that are consistently, "four to five times the rates for children in working households":
Click to view
While the fall in the hardship rate is good news, the percentage of all children living in beneficiary families increased from 15 to 19 percent between 2017 and 2024 (see Table 6).
So the rate of hardship has fallen but there are more children subject to it.
In my opinion, the growth in benefit-dependent children is primarily the result of increasing benefit payments and incentivising more families to opt for welfare and stay on it for longer.
The following further graph from the report illustrates the steep rise in beneficiary incomes over recent years (but does not include Best Start, Winter Energy Payment or Accommodation Supplement.) A sole parent with two children receives just under $700 weekly. Adding in the exclusions however, pushes that figure up to $1,057 weekly (April 2023). See Page 6, https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/research/benefit-system/total-incomes-annual-report-2023.pdf
Click to view
In respect of children in workless households, in 2022 (latest data) New Zealand was second only to Romania when compared to 26 European countries.
By family type the highest material hardship rate occurs in sole parent families at 32 percent (compared to 12 percent overall.)
The report notes, "New Zealand also has a relatively high proportion of sole parent households compared with European countries."
Most children on benefits are in sole parent households (70%).
In conclusion, the report shows that in general child well-being has improved and poverty has fallen.
However, the part of the equation that relates to those children living on benefits is not sustainable policy.
The numbers cannot be encouraged to keep growing. That will only ramp-up inter-generational dependency and further deplete potential productivity.
The feasible approach is that which Clark and Cullen adopted during the 2000s (but Ardern and Robertson shunned more latterly).
That was, work is the best way out of poverty. Always has been and always will be.
Simply shoveling ever more money into perpetually unemployed households is just another moribund idea from the Ardern era.
Lindsay Mitchell is a welfare commentator who blogs HERE. - where this article was sourced.
The following graph shows that children in beneficiary households experience material hardship at rates that are consistently, "four to five times the rates for children in working households":
Click to view
While the fall in the hardship rate is good news, the percentage of all children living in beneficiary families increased from 15 to 19 percent between 2017 and 2024 (see Table 6).
So the rate of hardship has fallen but there are more children subject to it.
In my opinion, the growth in benefit-dependent children is primarily the result of increasing benefit payments and incentivising more families to opt for welfare and stay on it for longer.
The following further graph from the report illustrates the steep rise in beneficiary incomes over recent years (but does not include Best Start, Winter Energy Payment or Accommodation Supplement.) A sole parent with two children receives just under $700 weekly. Adding in the exclusions however, pushes that figure up to $1,057 weekly (April 2023). See Page 6, https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/research/benefit-system/total-incomes-annual-report-2023.pdf
Click to view
In respect of children in workless households, in 2022 (latest data) New Zealand was second only to Romania when compared to 26 European countries.
By family type the highest material hardship rate occurs in sole parent families at 32 percent (compared to 12 percent overall.)
The report notes, "New Zealand also has a relatively high proportion of sole parent households compared with European countries."
Most children on benefits are in sole parent households (70%).
In conclusion, the report shows that in general child well-being has improved and poverty has fallen.
However, the part of the equation that relates to those children living on benefits is not sustainable policy.
The numbers cannot be encouraged to keep growing. That will only ramp-up inter-generational dependency and further deplete potential productivity.
The feasible approach is that which Clark and Cullen adopted during the 2000s (but Ardern and Robertson shunned more latterly).
That was, work is the best way out of poverty. Always has been and always will be.
Simply shoveling ever more money into perpetually unemployed households is just another moribund idea from the Ardern era.
Lindsay Mitchell is a welfare commentator who blogs HERE. - where this article was sourced.
2 comments:
Seems to me solo motherhood has been made a very attractive option. A standard of living is available comparable with many families in the 1950s, when most were very content. For the attractive sparkling girls able to snare good provider partners not the ideal option. Such partners moved many maori up the social scale, but astute blokes are now wary of latent tedious activists. With the demise of local clothing factories etc the job opportunities for the mediocre are limited. Ditto the social cicuit. Solo parenthood especially with a secure state unit is very attractive. Parenthood opens doors to many mixed social circles through care groups, school etc.The children are used as hostages for more payment which just makes the lifestyle more attractive. If I could be guaranteed a good sized garage workshop I would aim at coming back as a solo parent free from the tedium of regular work and the vast own time spent studying for and attempting to keep pace.It is absurd how the taxed public contributes so mach to support alternative life styles.
A huge subject. NZ has always had high unemployment way back through the Muldoon area and beyond. Government and councils were deliberately overstaffed a full time job being better than welfare.
Remember men leaning on shovels.
NZ deindustrialised. Jobs gone. We used to build trains now buy from Spain etc etc. We are now to buy gas from Australia. We are not doing enough for ourselves. It will take very good leadership to save NZ. Believing in the likes of the WEF will not cut it. The 1927 crash is going to hurt and the MPs seem totally unaware.
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.