Pages

Thursday, November 21, 2024

Professor Robert MacCulloch: Dame Whina Cooper's hīkoi was for change.....


Dame Whina Cooper's hīkoi was for change. This week's hīkoi was for keeping the status quo, the opposite of what the NZ Herald claims.

Today the NZ Herald's front page headline blared, "Hīkoi to Parliament: Tens of thousands energized for change after protest against Treaty Principles Bill .. The time for change is here". How Orwellian. This week's march was a march for the status quo. Its a protest against ACT's Treaty Principles Bill, which seeks to define in legislation what are those principles.

The status quo is that the principles continue to be written by the judiciary ("developed" is the legal word). MP Willie Jackson declared in Parliament this week, "The principles are clear - they're clear. They're about partnership .. equity .. active protection .. redress - simple". Who wrote that list? Judges, lawyers. Our Kings Counsels declared in a letter those principles are now part of our Constitution & can't be changed. They state its "uncertain" even whether the full Parliament has rights to alter them.

Whatever your views about those principles, one thing is sure. This week's Hīkoi is to support the status quo - its not a Hīkoi to change anything. The incredible Dame Whina Cooper led a hīkoi whose admirable aim was change - to respect land and property rights that were not being respected. She is quoted as saying, 'the Treaty was signed so that we could all live as one nation in Aotearoa'. But this hīkoi has nothing to do with Dame Whina's hīkoi. Its about not letting anyone change a thing. Good luck to the nation with its political and economic status quo. Dame Whina was not happy with the status quo in her time.


Professor Robert MacCulloch holds the Matthew S. Abel Chair of Macroeconomics at Auckland University. He has previously worked at the Reserve Bank, Oxford University, and the London School of Economics. He runs the blog Down to Earth Kiwi from where this article was sourced.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Do you blame them? The gravy train has been so richly rewarding for some (viz. a $70bn economy) and that doesn't include that largesse siphoned of by the legal eagles. If you're in on the take, who wouldn't want more of the same? To hell with the cost to the taxpayer and productivity. What is stunning, is the stupidity of a significant cohort of those that support this hikoi that don't see a penny. "Useful idiots" I think is the accepted term.

Anonymous said...

NZers should take a crash course on the principles listed by Jackson and the activist judiciary. (Co-) partnership, equity, redress via endless settlements - require the 83% to pay massive sums in perpetuity to fund the Maori agenda. No wonder activist Maori objects to Seymour's Bill where all citizens would be equal.

Anonymous said...

Who wouldn’t want to keep the gravy train rolling, if you are doing very nicely out of it, thank you!

Anonymous said...

Regrettably we have witnessed a grievance industry from early years evolve into a sort of perpetual motion machine. It cannot go on, and we all know it.

Post a Comment

Thanks for engaging in the debate!

Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.