With their hateful rhetoric and disruptive antics they have demonstrated that Māori seats have become the home of the most extreme race activists.
Te Pāti Māori have put the final nail in the coffin of Māori seats.
Apart from the behaviour and extremism mentioned, the very best reason we have for bringing an end to Māori seats is that we simply do not need them any longer.
Just look around the debating chamber! It is easy to find accomplished Māori leaders sitting in seats that they won in their own right. Whether they won an electorate or worked their way up their party list, they did not need a special seat reserved for them because of their race.
The views of Māori in New Zealand Parliament are as diverse as any other group. James Meager, former Speaker Adrian Rurawhe, Willow-Jean Prime, and David Seymour all have Māori heritage. Winston Peters and Willie Jackson stand on opposite sides of the House as senior list MPs for their parties. It is undeniable that Māori do not need a leg up to get proportionate representation.
Māori seats were introduced to provide specific representation for Māori in Parliament; however, in modern-day New Zealand, the current system of separate representation is divisive and no longer serves the true spirit of equality for all New Zealanders.
Every New Zealander, regardless of their race or ancestry, should have equal access to political representation. As our nation continues to grow and evolve, it's important to move beyond historical systems that no longer reflect our diverse society. The 21st century calls for unity, and the Māori seats are a legacy of a different time.
Māori seats were introduced in 1867 because at that time only men who owned property in their own name were allowed to vote. Because most Māori-owned land was owned communally, almost no Māori men got a vote. In 1867, all Māori men got the vote, whether they owned property or not.
The Royal Commission on the Electoral System in 1986 specifically recommended that, if New Zealand adopted the MMP system, there would no longer be any need for separate Māori electorates. Despite that recommendation, the Bolger Government failed to scrap them and they remain nearly 40 years later.
New Zealand’s electoral system should be based on a single principle: that each vote counts equally, and each person is entitled to fair representation. Abolishing the Māori seats moves us closer to this goal.
Te Pāti Māori would like everyone to think that without Māori seats there would be not a single Māori in Parliament. That is clearly rubbish. Every party in Parliament currently, except Labour, has had a Māori leader at some stage. Of the 123 MPs currently sworn in, 33 (by my count) are Māori.
We need to have a serious and respectful conversation about what purpose the Māori seats are serving. As far as I can tell, Te Pāti Māori are not even attempting to engage with the Government to achieve better outcomes for Māori - Pita Sharples and Tariana Turia did things differently. Waititi and Ngarewa-Packer focus instead on fomenting social disunity and trying to breach as many standing orders as possible.
If Arena Williams can win Manurewa, Tamatha Paul can win Wellington Central, and Tama Potaka can win Hamilton West, to name a few, why do we need a special spot for Rawiri Waititi to use to undermine our democracy?
Most New Zealanders will take a look at the disarray Te Pāti Māori have caused with their stunts and their defiance of the rules and agree that time is up for Māori seats.
Just look around the debating chamber! It is easy to find accomplished Māori leaders sitting in seats that they won in their own right. Whether they won an electorate or worked their way up their party list, they did not need a special seat reserved for them because of their race.
The views of Māori in New Zealand Parliament are as diverse as any other group. James Meager, former Speaker Adrian Rurawhe, Willow-Jean Prime, and David Seymour all have Māori heritage. Winston Peters and Willie Jackson stand on opposite sides of the House as senior list MPs for their parties. It is undeniable that Māori do not need a leg up to get proportionate representation.
Māori seats were introduced to provide specific representation for Māori in Parliament; however, in modern-day New Zealand, the current system of separate representation is divisive and no longer serves the true spirit of equality for all New Zealanders.
Every New Zealander, regardless of their race or ancestry, should have equal access to political representation. As our nation continues to grow and evolve, it's important to move beyond historical systems that no longer reflect our diverse society. The 21st century calls for unity, and the Māori seats are a legacy of a different time.
Māori seats were introduced in 1867 because at that time only men who owned property in their own name were allowed to vote. Because most Māori-owned land was owned communally, almost no Māori men got a vote. In 1867, all Māori men got the vote, whether they owned property or not.
The Royal Commission on the Electoral System in 1986 specifically recommended that, if New Zealand adopted the MMP system, there would no longer be any need for separate Māori electorates. Despite that recommendation, the Bolger Government failed to scrap them and they remain nearly 40 years later.
New Zealand’s electoral system should be based on a single principle: that each vote counts equally, and each person is entitled to fair representation. Abolishing the Māori seats moves us closer to this goal.
Te Pāti Māori would like everyone to think that without Māori seats there would be not a single Māori in Parliament. That is clearly rubbish. Every party in Parliament currently, except Labour, has had a Māori leader at some stage. Of the 123 MPs currently sworn in, 33 (by my count) are Māori.
We need to have a serious and respectful conversation about what purpose the Māori seats are serving. As far as I can tell, Te Pāti Māori are not even attempting to engage with the Government to achieve better outcomes for Māori - Pita Sharples and Tariana Turia did things differently. Waititi and Ngarewa-Packer focus instead on fomenting social disunity and trying to breach as many standing orders as possible.
If Arena Williams can win Manurewa, Tamatha Paul can win Wellington Central, and Tama Potaka can win Hamilton West, to name a few, why do we need a special spot for Rawiri Waititi to use to undermine our democracy?
Most New Zealanders will take a look at the disarray Te Pāti Māori have caused with their stunts and their defiance of the rules and agree that time is up for Māori seats.
Dr Don Brash, Former Governor of the Reserve Bank and Leader of the New Zealand National Party from 2003 to 2006 and ACT in 2011. Don blogs at Bassett, Brash and Hide - where this article was sourced
4 comments:
Correct, but to rid our selves of these un-needed seats and electorates takes both political courage and a backbone. New Zealand have since probably Norman Kirk has not seen politicians with either courage and certainly not a spine. Douglas, love or hate changed the economic direction but seemingly we are right back where we started.
Most of the country will agree with you Don. Perhaps if we stopped paying tax until they listened to the good people we might have a chance. I think if we keep tpm around for a bit longer, they will eventually implode. They are doing a pretty good job of switching people off.
Hopefully the Privileges Committee recommendation will not discourage Te Pati from some act so gross that maori will accept abolition of the maori seats without a crazed and violent hikoi to exceed all hikoi.
You are quite right, of course, Don.
The time for race based seats (Do I hear a whisper of that word" apartheid"?) has long gone.
A truly progressive move would be to end ALL official recognition of race or ethnicity in all legislation.
With race/ethnicity no longer having official status, there could be:-
NO more race-based seats or race-specific party in Parliament.
NO more race-based wards in local government.
NO more census questions about ethnicity.
NO more co-governance, and NO more basis for claims of unending victimhood.
NO Waitangi Tribunal !
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.