The question of race-based privilege in New Zealand has become increasingly polarising. For the left, government policies recognising Māori as tangata whenua are essential to honour the Treaty of Waitangi and correct “historical wrongs.” For others, these policies represent a dangerous departure from democratic equality, creating a two-tier system where rights and opportunities are determined not by citizenship, but by ethnicity.
A viral image circulating on social media starkly lays out the perceived advantages Māori hold, compared with what it claims other New Zealanders have - simply “privilege.” Whether you agree with its framing or not, the list illustrates just how far race-based policy has been embedded across the country’s institutions.

Click to view

Māori have a network of kura kaupapa (Māori-language immersion schools), Māori boarding schools, and scholarships reserved only for students with Māori whakapapa. Alongside these, the national curriculum incorporates Māori-specific content that other groups do not receive.
Supporters argue this preserves culture and improves Māori student outcomes. In my view this is exclusionary, given that many non-Māori families also face poverty and poor educational results but lack the same targeted opportunities.
Apartheid has no place in New Zealand
Matua Kahurangi
·
26 Jun

In New Zealand, we pride ourselves on fairness, equality, and opportunity. We are told that success comes from hard work, merit, and commitment. However, at Otago University’s medical school, one of the country’s most “prestigiously woke” institutions, that fundamental promise is being betrayed.
Read full story

There are Māori-only housing projects, Māori health providers with government contracts, and welfare programmes that prioritise Māori needs. Even within the prison system, rehabilitation and reintegration schemes are often designed exclusively for Māori inmates.
This approach ignores struggling Pākehā, Pasifika, or Asian New Zealanders who face similar disadvantages but cannot access the same assistance.
Whānau Ora funnels millions to iwi
Matua Kahurangi
·
2 Jul

It’s 6.30pm. The state-funded propaganda machine, otherwise known as 1News is droning on in the background while I’m half-listening, half-scrolling, slowly eating my dinner and getting sidetracked like usual. Then I stumbled across this little gem on RNZ that stopped me right in my tracks…
Read full story

The Resource Management Act requires Māori consultation on land and environmental issues. In practice, this often means iwi and hapū can delay or block developments unless they are consulted, or in some cases, compensated. Co-management arrangements over rivers, lakes, and coastal areas give iwi a direct say in governance where no equivalent role exists for other groups.
These arrangements are justified as fulfilling Treaty obligations. However, many New Zealanders view them as undemocratic, as they grant decision-making powers based on ancestry rather than merit or election.
The great co-governance swindle
Matua Kahurangi
·
22 Jul

In modern New Zealand, a quiet revolution is underway. It’s not fought with placards or parliamentary votes, but in boardrooms and council chambers, behind closed doors, away from the people who actually pay the bills. This is the era of co-governance - a creeping transfer of power from elected officials to unelected tribal elites, rubber-stamped by fac…
Read full story
The image also points to Māori-only ownership rights over parts of the foreshore and seabed, as well as a special Māori Authority tax rate of 17.5 percent. Māori charitable entities enjoy exemptions that no other ethnic group is afforded.
Enough of this rāhui bullsh*t
Enough of this rāhui bullsh*t
Matua Kahurangi
·
26 Aug

Over the weekend, the Otago Daily Times ran a story with the headline “Rāhui in place after body found on Wairau Bar.” Curious, I Googled the Wairau Bar and found it is in Marlborough. Sure enough, Stuff also carried the same story.
Read full story

Māori language funding is extensive, with billions invested in revitalising te reo Māori through education, broadcasting, and cultural initiatives. Māori Television, iwi radio stations, and government-sponsored campaigns ensure Māori voices are amplified.
This raises the issue of fairness. While celebrating Māori culture is widely accepted, taxpayers question whether state funding should be prioritised for one language and one culture above all others.
Welcome to Rohirohi Māori
Matua Kahurangi
·
1 Sept

The first of September doesn’t just mean spring has arrived. It also marks the official start of Rohirohi Māori – or as English speakers might prefer, Māori fatigue. For the next 7 days, brace yourself. Every news bulletin, radio broadcast, TV advert and television presenter will be working overtime to ram as much…
Read full story

One of the most controversial aspects is guaranteed Māori representation. From reserved seats in Parliament to designated Māori positions on councils, statutory boards, and advisory committees, Māori enjoy representation that no other ethnic group is guaranteed.
This arrangement dates back to the 19th century but has grown increasingly contentious as New Zealand becomes more multicultural. Democracy should mean “one person, one vote” - not weighted representation based on heritage.
Māori Seats
Matua Kahurangi
·
26 May

New Zealand prides itself on being a democratic nation committed to fairness, equality, and unity. Yet, within our parliamentary system exists a relic from another era - the Māori seats.
Read full story
At the heart of this debate lies a fundamental question - should rights, opportunities, and representation in New Zealand be determined by equal citizenship, or by ethnicity and ancestry?
Those pushing for co-governance and race-based initiatives argue that they are correcting past injustices. Their opponents warn that such policies entrench division and undermine national unity.
The image serves as a sharp reminder of just how much New Zealand has already institutionalised race-based advantages. Whether one views these as necessary redress or unfair privilege, the trend raises an uncomfortable truth: the country is drifting toward a two-tier society.
If New Zealand is to remain a stable democracy, it must resolve this tension - and decide whether equality means treating all citizens the same, or continuing to grant special rights to one group over all others.
Matua Kahurangi is just a bloke sharing thoughts on New Zealand and the world beyond. No fluff, just honest takes. He blogs on https://matuakahurangi.com/ where this article was sourced.
7 comments:
Everything you say is right Matua, but how does anyone get Christopher Luxon to accept he is causing irreparable damage to race relations in New Zealand by ignoring the ongoing takeover by Māori, who when all said and done, are of mixed race and no more indigenous than those of us whose families came later.
Matua, fantastic as usual. Higher honors await you. Luckily, I fall into the other camp of " privilege " . :)
Void the apartheid 1975 TOW Act from our legislation and watch it all fall down under the "fraud vitiates everything" principle. This Act was enacted using the fraudulent “English version” of the treaty which does not agree with the original Maori language treaty.
I am happy to support policies to assist people from difficult "socio-economic" circumstances rather than it being race based.
And also, to help foster culture and language unique to NZ.
But once it interferes with the democratic process, I reject it entirely.
We appear to be voices in the wilderness... but here goes. Getting a blood test the other day, the very competent nurse was part-Maori and told me her cousins were doctors. One was a cardiologist working in the US. I call nonsense to the idea that Maori can't achieve and need special privileges. I call nonsense to this new. radical agenda.I agree with anonymous at 10.0am. If this interferes with our democratic process I am also not okay with it.
Following on from Janine's comment, Michael Laws made a very interesting observation the other day about Maori and medicine which bears contemplation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVlCxqxVdD8
As for the rest, as Dr Suess noted, it didn't do the Sneetches any good.
TOW Act is one of the biggest shams introduced by the academic loony Geoffery Palmer. And exploited to the hilt by the likes of the ferret Findlayson. Whole thing should be repealed
Post a Comment
Thanks for engaging in the debate!
Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.