Pages

Friday, November 7, 2025

David Farrar: Science is back


The 2025 Marsden Fund grants have been announced, and finally they are now overwhelmingly going on hard science, rather than politics. I’ve updated my comparison table below.



As the Royal Society got more woke, less and less went on science, and more on woke projects and the like. In 2023 and 2024, 1 in 4 grants went to non-science areas. Now with a new ministerial direction, this is down to 1 in 12.

This is why who makes up Government does matter. Here’s some of the great projects being funded that may have missed out previously for nonsense such as $360,000 to collect disabled indigenous stories about climate change!
  • Breaking the N₂ Barrier: Ion-Beam-Engineered Vanadium Oxynitrides for Ambient Electrochemical Ammonia Synthesis
  • Combating drug resistance in cancers using shape-shifting inhibitors of DNA-mutating enzymes
  • Genetic and structural basis of antibiotic resistance spread: targeting a bacteria-bacteriophage partnership
  • Harnessing beneficial host-microbe interactions in the respiratory tract to improve infectious disease outcomes
We should thank Judith and Shane for getting science funding focused back on science!

David Farrar runs Curia Market Research, a specialist opinion polling and research agency, and the popular Kiwiblog where this article was sourced. He previously worked in the Parliament for eight years, serving two National Party Prime Ministers and three Opposition Leaders.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

and it would take Liebour less than a minute to move the focus back to Maori, identity and politics. Right, now Judith has sorted this, let's see some action on having English First in ALL public service machinations!

Anonymous said...

Totally agree, they have made science great again. No more whale songs to trees, no more investigating large carrots in Ohakune. Common sense prevails. Well done.

Anonymous said...

Common sense prevails, but for how long in this woke environment?

Anonymous said...

The incredible thing, for me, is that this correction had to be enacted in the first place.

Post a Comment

Thanks for engaging in the debate!

Because this is a public forum, we will only publish comments that are respectful and do NOT contain links to other sites. We appreciate your cooperation.