If it were not for Katrina Biggs, better known online as A B’old Woman, I would still believe that Waipareira Trust had finally been deregistered as a charity.
After I published an article on the vast fraud uncovered in Minnesota involving taxpayer-funded daycare and autism centres, Katrina sent me a link I had missed. A decision released by Charities Services on 17 December.
The decision was staggering.
Despite months of scrutiny and a formal preliminary deregistration notice, the Charities Registration Board ruled not to deregister Waipareira Trust under section 55D of the Charities Act 2005. CC31649 lives to see another funding round.
Why? Because the Board decided the Trust had “addressed” its governance failures at a level sufficient to retain charitable status. Not because wrongdoing was disproven. Not because the public interest had been restored. But because paperwork had been updated.
The Trust admitted it misunderstood its statutory obligations. It sought professional advice only after intervention. It began restructuring to “clearly distinguish” charitable and non-charitable activity.
Most revealingly, it created a separate legal entity that shares governance but not funding. In other words, the same people remain in control, while money flows through newly sanitised channels.
Remuneration was adjusted. Conflict-of-interest policies were introduced. Loans and bonus payments that should never have existed were quietly reversed. None of this answers the core question. It merely avoids it.
In 2023, Waipareira Trust’s senior management averaged over $510,000 each, across just 13.3 senior staff. That includes Chief Executive John Tamihere and Chief Operating Officer Awerangi Tamihere. A family-run leadership structure, funded by the public, operating under the moral shield of charity. When there’s money to be made, nepotism is never far behind. In some so-called Māori charities, it’s practically part of the business model.
Māori poverty pays very well if you run the trust
Matua Kahurangi 30 December 2025
The decision was staggering.
Despite months of scrutiny and a formal preliminary deregistration notice, the Charities Registration Board ruled not to deregister Waipareira Trust under section 55D of the Charities Act 2005. CC31649 lives to see another funding round.
Why? Because the Board decided the Trust had “addressed” its governance failures at a level sufficient to retain charitable status. Not because wrongdoing was disproven. Not because the public interest had been restored. But because paperwork had been updated.
The Trust admitted it misunderstood its statutory obligations. It sought professional advice only after intervention. It began restructuring to “clearly distinguish” charitable and non-charitable activity.
Most revealingly, it created a separate legal entity that shares governance but not funding. In other words, the same people remain in control, while money flows through newly sanitised channels.
Remuneration was adjusted. Conflict-of-interest policies were introduced. Loans and bonus payments that should never have existed were quietly reversed. None of this answers the core question. It merely avoids it.
In 2023, Waipareira Trust’s senior management averaged over $510,000 each, across just 13.3 senior staff. That includes Chief Executive John Tamihere and Chief Operating Officer Awerangi Tamihere. A family-run leadership structure, funded by the public, operating under the moral shield of charity. When there’s money to be made, nepotism is never far behind. In some so-called Māori charities, it’s practically part of the business model.
Māori poverty pays very well if you run the trust
Matua Kahurangi 30 December 2025
If you’re on X, you may have seen a report by independent journalist Nick Shirley into Somali-run daycare centres in Minneapolis. According to the investigation, these centres received staggering sums of public money despite reportedly having no enrolled children. The 42-minute video has racked up around 84 million views on x since it was posted on 26 December. That does not happen by accident. It happens because people recognise a scandal when they see one.
Read full story
This is where the hypocrisy becomes impossible to ignore.
Waipareira Trust presents itself as a kaupapa Māori organisation, grounded in Māori values, Māori leadership, and Māori outcomes. That identity is central to its funding narrative, political leverage, and public legitimacy.
However, a glance at the Trust’s own leadership structure shows senior roles occupied by individuals of Chinese background, including its Chief Financial Officer and other high-ranking executives. Which is smart, I’ll give them that, because Māori are whūkn’ terrible at handling large sums of money.
If Waipareira is a modern, multicultural organisation, it should say so openly.
If it is a Māori organisation deserving of special treatment, funding pathways, and political deference, then that claim deserves scrutiny.
Matua Kahurangi is just a bloke sharing thoughts on New Zealand and the world beyond. No fluff, just honest takes. He blogs on https://matuakahurangi.com/ where this article was sourced.
4 comments:
It seems the Charities Services need to be investigated in depth as well as the Waipareira Trust. What does the SFO think its job is ? One would think this is a prime example of why it exists !
Yes, we've heard that $510k "average" salary countless times. What I want to know is, what do the the CEO & COO each receive?
A charitable trust their for the advancement of poor, under- privileged Maori, all the while the fat 'Maori' cats at the top expand their significant wealth from the taxpayer purse. What an outrageous travesty, and still it goes on!
John Tamihere had meetings with the CCP in 2024 that were discussed in the international media but not in the New Zealand mainstream media. John can talk to whoever he likes but the silence of the NZ media on those meetings was disturbing.
We are led to believe that New Zealand isn't corrupt
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.