The current NZ First-National Coalition agreement includes: “The coalition government will defend the principle that New Zealanders are equal before the law, with the same rights and obligations, and with theguarantee of the privileges and responsibilities of equal citizenship in New Zealand.”
Furthermore, prior to the 14 October 2023 election, NZ First policy (Retrieved 7 October 2023) included: “New Zealand First wants every kiwi to be treated the same, to have equal opportunity and to be treated with fairness and respect” and to “Rule out working with any political party that promotes separatism.”
The ACT-National Coalition agreement similarly includes a commitment to “restore national unity, and boost social cohesiveness” along with “upholding the principles of liberal democracy, including equal citizenship…”
Moreover, ACT’s pre-election policy was given as, “ACT has a vision of a society in which no one is treated differently based on who their ancestors were” (Retrieved 6 October 2023). A discussion paper, Democracy or Co-government? (undated), claims “All New Zealanders are equal under the law, with the same rights and duties.”
However, the Local Government (Water Services) Act 2025, which was subsequently passed entirely within the current term of the present coalition Government, gives Maori exclusive rights and duties.
The Coalition introduced the Waters Services Bill 9 December 2024 and it was given Royal Assent 25 August 2025. Note that it was introduced in the first year of the term so they must have begun working on it not longafter their election promises. It was not left until the final year of the term, like the review of Treaty provisions in legislation which has yet to be completed.
That project is intended to review legislation, except treaty settlement acts, which mention “the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi” and “replace all such references with specific words relating to the relevance and application of the Treaty, or repeal the references”. The review of Treaty provisions includes the Water Services Regulator Act 2020 Sections 5, 12 and 19. However, Sections 14-17 regarding a Maori Advisory Group will presumably remain. (here)
It is disappointing that the 23 pieces of legislation included in the review do not include the Water Services Act 2025. Apparently, that is because the Water Services Act does not mention “the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi” and includes only “specific words” for consultation with Maoris and appeals to the Maori Land Court. (here)
Regarding consultation, the Water Services Act includes a “Significance and engagement policy” (Sections 33–38) for Water organisations, such as Wellington’s Metro Water, which says:
- “The purpose of the policy is … to enable the organisation to develop a flexible and locally appropriate approach to engagement, which recognises and accommodates the preferences and expectations of … any particular communities specified in the policy (for example, iwi, hapū, and other Māori organisations in the water organisation’s service area)”. Section 35 (3) (b) (iv)
- “When preparing a significance and engagement policy, a water organisation must engage with … any particular communities identified by shareholders (for example, iwi, hapū, and other Māori organisations in the organisation’s service area)” Section 37 (3) (a) (iv)
Regarding the Maori Land Court, the Act says:
- “the water service provider may appeal the matter to the Māori Land Court” for a decision. Section 166 (4) (b).
- “An owner of Māori-owned land may appeal to the Māori Land Court against the outcome of an internal review.” Section 170 (1).
The consequent Metro Water organisation “Metropolitan Wellington Water Services Delivery Plan” (WSDP), completed in August 2025, says (here, p.4):
Metro Water “has been developed jointly by the five councils working in partnership with mana whenua partners Ngāti Toa Rangatira and Taranaki Whānui ki Te Upoko o Te Ika. The new organisation is intended to operate from 1 July 2026 (Day One). It will have legal status as a water organisation under the Local Government (Water Services) Act 2025.”
The Plan concludes (p. 89), “Ultimately, the successful establishment of Metro Water will depend on a partnership between councils and mana whenua…”
(As an aside, the Water Services Act 2025 sets governance and planning obligations, but not project level construction schedules. The WSDP is about governance structures, funding and finance models and does not say what actual work will be done, which could be years away (e.g., pipe replacement and Moa Point). We have only been told that they will install water meters so they can charge us for usage. We are paying a lot of moneyand we don’t know what we will get for it.)
So, at the time of the last election, the coalition parties said they will uphold the principles of equal citizenship. In demonstrating those principles, they enacted the Water Services Bill. But, in fact, the resulting Act provides for exclusive consultancy rights and appeal duties for a particular racial group in New Zealand, which is contrary to the Coalition agreement of equal citizenship. The Act in turn provides for a claim of a legal basis for a partnership between the Wellington Water organization (Metro Water) and local iwi.
Dr Brash of Hobson’s Pledge says much the same regarding the Planning Bill and the Natural Environment Bill which are intended to replace the Resource Management Act. He says the Coalition agreement is not met in the RMA replacement Bills: “Throughout both bills, those with some Maori ancestry are given a preferred constitutional status in direct contradiction to the values which the parties to the coalition government profess.”(here)
Geoff Parker says something similar about the NZ Transport Agency (here).
The Water Services Act replaces the Three Waters legislation which includes co-governance or mandatory iwi representation language. But the Water Services Act does not replace the exclusive race-based rights of Three Waters, it merely postpones them.
The Water Services Act provides for relationships, processes and rules based on exclusive rights which may be promoted to those of Three Waters at the stroke of a pen. That may well happen at the next inevitable change of Government.
We are continually being fed an attractive line prior to elections, such as the TPB at the last election, which does not meet the expectations it sets. For the coming election watch how the proposed legislation for an automatic enactment Maori seats referendum gets demoted to a non-binding referendum which will not survive the next Labour-led Government.
Yet, you will still vote for one of the Coalition parties. Why? Because you have nowhere else to go. And they know that.
The question remains: Why do they do it?
Barrie Davis is a retired telecommunications engineer, holds a PhD in the psychology of Christian beliefs, and can often be found gnashing his teeth reading The Post outside Floyd’s cafe at Island Bay.
10 comments:
Everybody here should watch Duncan Garners latest interview with the Far North Councils very brave councillor who is laying bare what is going on in your country, New Zealand. He was flabbergasted, I was flabbergasted.
To National supporters: Simon Watts is aware of all this, no doubt Luxon as well.
This elected lady has been receiving death threats simply because she is trying to do here elected duty towards her taxpayers.
Hugely disappointed in govt on these issues, it is costing us so much money, and causing so much social harm. I am going to be listening and analyzing very carefully to the excuses that im sure are about to come
Yes WHY?
Goldsmith has received the report of the Committee to review removing Treaty refs. from legislation - and promptly stopped further action in the matter. This is an official element of the Nat./NZF Coalition agreement - so why is all action stopped? Voters deserve a full explanation.
It’s simple. The international bankers control NZ via the main government corporation and the iwi subsidiaries. The legislation is designed to disenfranchise ordinary men and women of any race.
It’s like WWE wrestling. Stage a fight between the “crown” corporation and the “iwi” corporations. It doesn’t matter who wins. Both are controlled by the international bankers.
The audience identifies with one fighter or another and the fight among the fans spills out into general society.
The fans have no control or benefits from the fight indeed the tickets cost money. And Vince McMahon (I.e. the bankers) makes money no matter who wins and, more importantly, McMahon controls the whole system.
So long as we continue to pretend that the fight is real, we will continue to be powerless.
NZ needs an ACT/NZF alliance to confront Nat - which is pushing action to advance CG and He Puapua. This alliance - promoting equal citizenship - would win in 2026 with Nat a distant 3rd - but there will be massive Iwi-driven protest.
It is impossible not to notice that our political parties, all of those presently in Parliament, are dancing to a tune that we, the voters, cannot even hear. The evidence of our eyes surely tells that the lever of ‘Maorification’ is being used, very effectively, to destroy the Anglo-centric constitution that this country was lucky enough to have for the last 180 years. The power manipulating our MPs at the highest levels must be overwhelmingly potent to force such treasonous behaviour as we have seen for, probably, the last 25 years or maybe more.
We cannot vote our way out of this nightmare. The only rational approach remains not to participate at all, and thus attempt to remove their mandate to govern. Don’t vote!
Could someone with the expertise advise the V-Dem Institute in Sweden about the ongoing apartheid, and loss of democracy in NZ ?
Maybe significant criticism from abroad might help stop the rot ?
https://www.v-dem.net/documents/75/V-Dem_Institute_Democracy_Report_2026_lowres.pdf
@anon 10am Shane jones has been handing out loans to broke iwi businesses like they’re going out of fashion - loans that are on top of other loans. They’re promoted as being loans for “business “ or regional development- it just so happens they are only for maori businesses and maori developers.
I don’t trust nzf at all - I don’t trust any of them but look at what they do twice as much as what they say….
Just today, I have seen three nonsense comments from Anonymous idiots (presumably the same one) under three different opinion pieces, urging people not to vote. Here it's Anon @ 10.41am.
I'm curious, Anon @ 10.41am: If none of the people who desire change vote, how will change ever be effected? Please expand on your bizarre logic for me, I'm a bit slow at connecting the dots.
Or is this some clever attempt to try and convince people who might be of a 'right-leaning' persuasion not to vote, thereby gifting power to your beloved Greens and/or TPM?
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.