Andrew Dickens: Is the Michelin guide worth taxpayer money?

The first Michelin rankings of New Zealand restaurants are out later this month.

Yesterday, Jesse Mulligan, the Herald’s restaurant reviewer, pointed out it’s going to be a very incomplete list of our best restaurants and worth little to most, including the high wealth tourists it’s supposed to attract.

There’s a couple of reasons.

Firstly geographic. The reviewers have only visited Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch and Queenstown. So restaurants outside that area, many in our wine growing districts, won’t even be visited.

His examples are Craggy Range in Hawke’s Bay and Arbour in Marlborough which he reviewed as being most probably New Zealand’s best restaurant.

He also argues that that local word-of-mouth and trusted, down-to-earth recommendations hold more practical value for diners than anonymous international inspectors.

He reckons 35 restaurants might be reviewed, and we’d be lucky to see any get a star.

Now normally I wouldn’t care.

Except Tourism New Zealand paid NZ $6.3 million to bring the Michelin Guide to the country in a three-year partnership agreement.

That’s an awful lot of taxpayer's money to get a very incomplete and small guide of New Zealand restaurants that miss our best and much of our country.

You know what that sounds like to me?

That sounds like wasteful government spending.

Andrew Dickens is a broadcaster with Newstalk ZB. - where this article was sourced.