Pages

Friday, July 17, 2026

Perspective with Heather du Plessis-Allan: The Government needs to prove what it said about co-governance wasn't just hot air


If anyone on a council at the moment can't understand why so many of us ratepayers are so hostile towards them, sometimes bordering on hatred, can I just suggest they take a look at what's going on with these agreements with iwi? That might actually give them a bit of an idea.

If you haven't followed this, Chris Bishop is planning to replace the Resource Management Act shortly and his replacement law will not allow councils to sign any more of these agreements.

These agreements are called Mana Whakahono a Rohe agreements. In some cases, and certainly in the more extreme examples, they effectively cede significant decision-making power to iwi.

The new law will not allow any further agreements to be signed but it will allow existing agreements to continue. So, of course, what's happening is that councils are rushing to sign as many of these things as they can before the law changes.

The Far North District Council is trying to sign five of them, apparently without involving elected councillors in the process. They're reportedly not even allowed to see the detail.

I've had a letter today from the Mayor of Carterton drawing my attention to the fact that Greater Wellington Regional Council, which covers Carterton, is doing exactly the same thing, despite objections from two of its constituent councils: Carterton and Kāpiti.

Environment Canterbury tried to rush one through this week, then got busted and pulled it from the agenda.

The fact that councils are being cynical like this will come as no surprise to anyone because they did exactly the same thing with Māori wards when they knew that, in many cases, their own ratepayers did not support them.

But this gets much more difficult for the Government because it, particularly the National Party and ACT, said this co-governance stuff would end. Yet they are allowing it to continue under their new RMA laws by permitting these agreements to carry over.

They need to change that law. They need to change it before it becomes law if they really meant what they said.

Importantly, if they want to retain the faith of the voters who backed them to end this stuff, then they need to act when they have the chance next week, when the select committee report on the RMA reforms comes back. They need to say that these agreements will be rendered void under the new law and that whatever has been signed in a last-minute rush will count for nothing.

This is the Government's big test. It's the chance to prove that what it said about co-governance wasn't just hot air.

Heather du Plessis-Allan is a journalist and radio broadcaster who hosts Newstalk ZB's weekday Drive-Time Show – where this article was sourced.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

I agree. I want a democratic country. With as little fraud, corruption and back hand deals as possible. Why should I vote national this election? They haven't done what they said they would do!!!

Anonymous said...

They need to do nothing of the sort. We need custodians of the land and sea or it will all be lost to Shane Jones’s mates in mining and fishing. Does the mining industry have NZ’s interests at heart? What a joke.

Anonymous said...

Yes.
Trouble is the whole way they are attacking Local Government is going to make things worse.
First, you have to understand the problem, which they don't.
I fear for the future with National undertaking RMA changes that will most likely miss the parts that are causing problems.
Watts and Bishop like most National MP's don't understand Local Government.

Anonymous said...

Yes this is a litmus test that National will fail at its peril. It went into the last election 'intimating' that it would deal with the co-governance issue but with fingers firmly crossed behind its back. If they do not step up and correct this by obviating these insidious agreements it should very deservedly cost them dear. However, I suspect they are banking on an electorate sleepwalking into this coming election.

Anonymous said...

Economy? Energy security? Food security and affordability?Unemployment? Wealth disparity? We care not for these things. HDPA is on the money.

OlderChas said...

Hear hear.

Anonymous said...

100% Heather!!!. It certainly makes my blood boil. But it is not only local govt that is giving in the maori mafia, it is also central govt and they need to WAKE up . We have had enough!!!!. All the money that is paid out is only improving the lives of the elite few. Its corrupt and just has to stop.

Doug Longmire said...

Hear, Hear Heather !!
The takeover is well under way.
As I have said before, It is way overdue to end ALL official or legal recognition of race or ethnicity in ALL legislation in New Zealand.
With race/ethnicity no longer having legal status, there would be:-
NO more race-based seats
NO race-specific party in Parliament.
NO more race-based wards in local government.
NO more census questions about ethnicity.
NO more co-governance.
NO “Treaty principles” in legislation
NO more so called “Treaty” claims of unending victimhood.
NO separate Health Authority.
NO Waitangi Tribunal !
NO racial apartheid !
We would all be EQUAL in New Zealand. !!

History tells us that NO NATION OR SOCIETY CAN SURVIVE WHILE RACIST ACTIVISTS PROMOTE DIVISION AND ENTITLEMENT ON THE BASIS OF RACE, (i.e. APARTHEID

Anonymous said...

I don't understand Nationals motive - why are they doing this to the vast majority of the population against their wishes?

I greatly suspect it's Luxon's personal agenda ?
He lied to us before the last agenda about this , and has strenuously avoided any questions since he became PM.
Definitely not to be trusted again.
Watts and Bishop need to put the changes through this afternoon under Urgency.

Post a Comment

Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.