Back in the good old days, they were all Ministers of booze. The whole cabinet. Especially Robert Muldoon.
But the idea that we need a Minister responsible for Alcohol is well-intentioned, like all 80-odd portfolios that reviews and recommendations have created.
This one is a recommendation from the Hospitality Sector Regulatory Review.
The review was done by the Ministry for Regulation.
That was created to cut red tape and make government less complicated.
It's recommended creating a new agency and a new Ministerial responsibility.
It was announced by the Minister for Regulation, David Seymour, who's role was also set up to cut red tape.
Can you see the problem here?
There are no doubt good reasons to make rules simpler and get rid of regulations.
But creating a new Minister and ministry who then does a review and recommends creating another agency and another Ministerial job just sounds backwards.
It's like a bacterial. Bureaucratic bacteria. They multiply and spread everywhere.
One minute it's a single cell, the next minute it's split into two. Next minute there's four. It goes on and on.
We need fewer jobs in Wellington, not more.
Remember, Ireland, Norway, Singapore and Finland who are similar size to us, they all have fewer than 20 Ministerial roles. The UK, Canada, United States and Korea have fewer than 30.
The saving grace is that no decisions on the review have been made. Why not just cut the red tape and send the pollies for a beer at Bellamys.
Ryan Bridge is a New Zealand broadcaster who has worked on many current affairs television and radio shows. He currently hosts Newstalk ZB's Early Edition - where this article was sourced.
2 comments:
Perhaps a Ministry for Minding Their Own Business would be more useful.
A decade ago I advocated within ACT (the party asked me to stand for Epsom before David) for it to promote adherence to strict cost benefit analysis of all government rules to cut red tape. That function should've been executed by putting a small crack team of technocrats in our existing NZ Treasury to do what's inherently an actuarial style technical job. ACT leader Seymour did not. David loves centralization. He loves power. So he set up his own Ministry of Regulation of which he personally is boss. He added red tape. He added complexity. Just like how ACT centralized school lunch provision under David's command. Just like how ACT centralized power in Auckland by amalgamating councils. ACT is not what most readers of this website think it is. It loves big monopolies. It loves centralization. It is anti competition. And its all about one man, David.
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.