It’s said that when someone once asked the Chinese
communist leader Zhou Enlai about the impact of the French Revolution, he
replied that it was too soon to say.
This was in the 1970s, nearly 200 years after the event.
The message from this is that historical patterns emerge
slowly and it’s unwise to draw conclusions too soon. Nonetheless I’m going to
stick my neck out and predict that 2018 will be recorded as the year when New
Zealand was irrevocably drawn into the so-called culture wars – the global contest
between neo-Marxists, who view Western civilisation as rotten and oppressive,
and the upholders of traditional mainstream values and beliefs.
Consider the following:
It was the year when we had to acquire a new vocabulary
to encompass previously unimagined variations of sexuality and gender identity.
(I’ve learned that I’m “cisgender”, which means I identify with the gender
“assigned” to me at birth, presumably on the flimsy basis that I had male
organs.)
We became familiar with the word “transphobic”, for
anyone who doesn’t unquestioningly comply with the agenda of transgender
activists, and we learned a strange new adjective, “woke”, which denotes
someone who has an ideologically correct line on issues such as gender
politics, race and class oppression.
It was a year when we were encouraged to believe that far
from being biologically determined, gender is a mere social construct, and that
we should discard gender-specific pronouns such as “he” and “she” because they
are tools of oppression.
It was the year when anyone who dared to dissent from the
“woke” consensus on issues such as gender identity, multiculturalism and
climate change risked being branded as a far-Right extremist and howled down.
It was the year when the sheer volume of white noise from
a tiny but shrill minority of neo-Marxists almost succeeded in dominating the
public conversation.
It was the year when the polarising effect of social
media was magnified by algorithms that pushed people into extreme positions on
both the Left and Right, to the extent that the centre-ground sometimes seemed
almost to vanish from sight.
It was a year when universities, which were once places
of edgy ideas and intellectual cut and thrust, slipped further into a state of
rigid dogmatic conformity.
It was a year when free speech came under sustained
attack, but in a highly selective way. Free speech was permissible if you
belonged to an aggrieved minority, but not for anyone defending what might be
called mainstream values. Then it became hate speech.
It was the year when people in positions of authority who
should defend freedom of speech, such as Auckland mayor Phil Goff and Massey
University vice-chancellor Jan Thomas, tried to prevent New Zealanders from
being exposed to ideas that they decided were harmful.
It was the year when a biological accident of birth
became the new Original Sin; when anyone who was white, middle-class and
heterosexual, women as well as men, was deemed to occupy a position of
privilege that disqualified them from expressing an opinion on anything.
It was a year in which that notion of “privilege” became
ever broader, even to the extent that thin people were attacked for oppressing
those who are overweight.
It was a year in which the once-honourable word “liberal”
continued to be used, without a trace of irony, to describe people whose
intolerance of differing opinions is the very opposite of liberalism.
It was the year when the New Zealand Left fractured in
fascinating ways as the “old” far Left, which still believes in free speech,
turned against the precious neo-Marxist Left which insists on the right not to
be offended; and when hard-core feminists, who were accustomed to being at the
cutting edge of sexual politics, suddenly found themselves in the unfamiliar
position of being labelled as oppressors by the transgender lobby.
It was the year when anyone rash enough to express even
mild scepticism about climate change was equated with the denialists who insist
there was no Holocaust. And it was the year when we learned of a phenomenon
called presentism, which seeks to deny history by erasing all reminders of our
past that don’t align with 21st century moral judgments.
The good news is that the vast majority of New
Zealanders, not being susceptible to bizarre political extremes, remained
largely untouched by the ideological wars raging around them. If they’re aware
of them, their attitude is probably one of mild bemusement at the absurdity of
it all.
But the not-so-good news is that while those ordinary New
Zealanders get on with their lives, neo-Marxists are seeking to reshape society
in profound ways, and they have the ear of the political elites. Zhou Enlai would have found it fascinating.
Karl du Fresne, a freelance journalist, is the
former editor of the Dominion-Post. He blogs at karldufresne.blogspot.co.nz.
5 comments:
>"It was a year in which the once-honourable word “liberal” continued to be used, without a trace of irony, to describe people whose intolerance of differing opinions is the very opposite of liberalism."
One of several instances of the americanisation of the English language. With words such as 'liberal', 'conservative' and 'secular' having very different meanings in US English from those espoused by the Oxford, meaningful exchanges of views about the overarching issues has become increasingly difficult.
Good job Karl, a very useful summary and reference for us all.
Phil H.
I recommend Whiteshift by Eric Kaufmann
While i agree with the bulk of what you are saying, however its actually got very little to do with Marxism. It seems to me you are doing exactly what you advocate against in your article - putting a different spin on an old concept to suit a politically expedient modern ideal or agenda simply to create a label for it and therefore compartmentalize it.
Thanks Karl. You are one of the few voices of reason left in the media now.
Post a Comment