The claim that adjusting Treaty clause wording will create decades of instability gets the problem backwards.
New Zealand’s ongoing tension over Treaty principles isn’t caused by too little legal weight—it’s caused by inconsistency and ambiguity across laws. Different statutes use different phrases (“recognise,” “have regard to,” “give effect to”), creating uncertainty about what the Treaty actually requires in practice.
That lack of clarity is exactly what drives litigation, not resolves it.
















