Pages

Friday, October 23, 2026

Gary Judd KC: A Story Is Not Enough


Witchcraft and all that

In A Halfling’s View, The Tyranny of a Good Story, subtitled “In praise of guides who can prove what they say — and against the fashion that pretends it doesn’t matter,” retired Judge David Harvey contrasts An account you can check, or an account you must swallow. He says:

Strip away the sentiment and the choice is stark.

David Harvey: Labour’s Online Policy


The great thing about the Left is that they never fail to disappoint. Rather like Cassandra I have been predicting that Labour and the Left would develop an interventionist Online Policy. In fact in September I suggested that when Hipkins announced Labour’s AI policy it was something of a Trojan Horse. One of the elements there was the presence of an Online Regulator.

Richard Prebble: What can we read into the TVNZ poll?


I have a reputation for being able to read polls. Pollsters used to ask me for my analysis. My immediate reaction is to wait and see if it is a trend.

Having got the product warning out of the way, the TVNZ-Verian poll has a good record of predicting election results, with one proviso. The polls have repeatedly misjudged minor-party support.

Simon O'Connor: The Most Important Boring Election


Why New Zealanders seem strangely uninspired by one of the most important elections in years.

I was reflecting on my reactions to the recent leader and ‘minor party’ debates. I’ve found them dull, full of predictable talking points, and carefully rehearsed responses. They seem less a contest of ideas and more an exercise in political management.

Yet, at the same time, I am very aware just how close this election is and how critical the result will be for the future of New Zealand.

Kerre Woodham: Free speech doesn't mean you can threaten people


There's a text here, "talk about a beat up by ZB on politicians and threats. If you raise the possibility and keep flagging potential problems, you may get what you predict. So stupid to highlight this on your news at this time," says Paul. I don't think that's true. I think there are very, very, very few people worldwide, even with all the problems that abound, that would act in the way that this 43 year old Australian has done. Very few. But what people need to understand is that violent words, violent rhetoric can breed violent actions, and it may help temper the kind of madness that you see online. And the attack on the Australian independent MP Helen Haines is absolutely horrific, and it will make the news. It is newsworthy.

The 43 year old man has been charged with a number of serious offences in relation to the attack, which was brutal and premeditated. Haines was unloading her car outside her electoral office when the man did a U turn and ran into her a number of times with his Land Cruiser, crushing her between the two vehicles. It wasn't a one off, it wasn't a moment of madness, it was several moments of madness. She has lost one leg, doctors are fighting to save the other, and in a cruel irony, it appears the man was a family friend. His father and stepmother have been friends with Haines for more than 20 years.

She certainly sounds like one of the good guys, one of the very people you want to attract to Parliament. She had a life before entering Parliament, she was a nurse, a mother, an advocate for the rural community, and then once elected she led an anti corruption campaign within Parliament. It was a senseless, cruel attack on a good woman.

And our MPs must have had a shiver go down their spines because many of them have been on the receiving end of personal attacks and death threats. My own MP, Dan Bidois, had to bring in the police when he received death threats that were deemed credible. Dan is a hardworking MP, a dad of two little ones, he's always at the local community events, does an amazing job for his constituents, but for whatever reason, probably because he had the temerity to stand for National, he received death threats. Speaker of the House Gerry Brownlee says they are well aware of the threats to MPs and even to candidates, and they take it very seriously.

"Massive increase in threats to members of Parliament, particularly to women members of Parliament. And I think it's also the nature of those threats has changed from, you know, it might have been a bit of personal abuse about how someone presented themselves or other such, right down to now increasingly threats of physical violence as well. We've had to respond, we've set up a unit called the Security Intelligence Research Advisory Service, SIRAS, and they've got a team that will go out and be with MPs, they've deployed quite considerably during this period. But it's also candidates out there, and I think the work we've been able to do with the New Zealand Police, and I've got to take my hat off to them, I think they've done a great job in contacting all candidates and giving them personal numbers to be able to call should they feel threatened. Because, you know, you just don't know, you can't blanket everybody all the time, but you certainly need to have something that makes it very clear that if people are out of line, they're going to get prosecuted or at least deterred."

And they do need to be prosecuted and deterred because that angry, angry rhetoric, that violent rhetoric can lead to physical assaults. I mean, look at James Shaw, he's one of the more reasonable, hardworking, lovely MPs, whatever you think of his politics, assaulted by a man in the street and needed hospital attention when he was in Parliament. And a lot of people throw off at the fact that Jacinda Ardern lives offshore with her family, well, in large part that's because of the truly horrific threats that were made not just against her, but her daughter, her little girl.

You can have an opinion, you can have a reckon, you can have a strong opinion, and that's the other thing that concerns me, that people are so wary of the nutters out there that you can't even voice a strong opinion against policy or against decisions made by MPs, which dampens down free speech because people aren't responsible when it comes to the right to free speech. Free speech doesn't mean you can abuse, insult, threaten to kill, threaten to rape, threaten to murder MPs and members of their families. It's a responsibility as well as a right, and you have to use it accordingly.

Social media's given people license to be real heroes. They say terrible things that they would never say when they were face to face with the individual. A friend of mine who's got quite a high profile on the social medias, that's part of how she makes a living, said, "Whatever happened to the days of talking about people behind their back? I don't need some troll to come on my page and tell me how ugly and revolting and what a loser I am. Tell your mates! I don't need to know about it. Bring back the days of talking about people behind their backs." And she's got a point. Not everybody has to hear your views of how ugly or how stupid or how ignorant or how politically misguided you are.

I've never done it. I've been annoyed with people before online, people have annoyed me, and I've thought, "Well, I won't read this anymore. I'll make sure that my algorithms don't throw up this kind of content." I don't really feel the need to go on and tell people that they're ugly losers and completely hopeless at what they do and I'll shoot them. No matter how annoyed I've got over the years about political decisions, I have never wished the individuals harm. Ever. Ever. You don't even think it. I really do think that the rhetoric that people feel emboldened to use because they feel they can be anonymous can fuel the kind of completely irrational violence that we saw in Australia yesterday. It's not very far away in terms of geographical distance in Australia, but also in terms of that kind of violence. We need to be careful.

Kerre McIvor, is a journalist, radio presenter, author and columnist. Currently hosts the Kerre Woodham mornings show on Newstalk ZB - where this article was sourced.

Geoff Parker: Te Tiriti Is Not a Blank Cheque for Constitutional Transformation


Professor Carwyn Jones warns that the debate over Te Tiriti goes “to the heart of Aotearoa’s constitutional future”. He is right about one thing: this is a constitutional debate. But that makes the question of who gets to determine that future extremely important.

The problem is that Jones presents a particular modern interpretation of Te Tiriti as though it provides an established constitutional framework for New Zealand today. It does not.

Andrew Dickens: We need more dentists


There's an election promise to train more dentists in Otago – the first increase in training numbers in 10 years.

And if it comes to pass, you'll have to ask, why did this not happen earlier?

In John Key's day, economic policy supercharged our economy on the back of mass immigration and surging property prices.

David Farrar: IMF’s 2027 growth forecasts


The IMF has just published their forecasts for economic growth for 2027. They show that NZ is projected to have far better growth than many other countries. An extract:

Mike's Minute: Labour is fighting our memories - and time


Surely it's only one more day before Chris Hipkins gets to, just maybe, put the gangs in the rear-view mirror.

In his new found assessment that handing millions to the Mongrel Mob when last in government was "a mistake", he reveals the real issue he faces this election campaign;

Time.

The gap between what he did and what he now promises to do is too short. That is roughly why most governments get two terms.

JC: Good Luck Chippie – You’ll Need It


Hipkins’ bedfellows are bordering on the bizarre. If only we could have a leaders debate featuring Hipkins, Swarbrick, Waititi and Wong. Hipkins would find himself spending 90 minutes between three rocks and a hard place. The differences between Labour and the rest would be of such magnitude that split voting on the right, now vital to determining the outcome of the election, would become completely unnecessary.

The policy rubbish coming from the Greens, Māori Party and Opportunity Party can only mean they are not taking ‘thinking’ voters seriously – it’s more like they are taking us for fools. On election night they might just find out who the fools really are – themselves. They are certainly giving the impression they have absolutely no clue about the economy.

Thursday October 22, 2026 

                   ⇩

Thursday, October 22, 2026

Anglo Saxon: Tax payer funded academic debunked on New Zealand's "illegal founding."


Anglo Saxon says Claire Charters is a radicalised academic with some outrageous claims and wild theories. Her salary comes out of our pockets.

Click to view

John Denton: The Tragedy of the Commons: Self-interest and NZ Politics


One of the more interesting paradoxes in economics is that individuals pursuing their own economic interests can collectively produce an outcome that leaves everyone worse off. This is the tragedy of the commons.

The idea was first clearly formulated in 1833 by William Forster Lloyd, an Oxford professor of political economy, as follows.

David Lillis: Education, Science and the Election


“I have a foreboding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time - when the United States is a service and information economy; when nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries; when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness...” Carl Sagan (1995).

Breaking Views Update: Week of 18.10.26







Thursday October 22, 2026 

News:
Woman vows to continue occupation of abandoned school despite Treaty settlement

Alice Wairau has been occupying a closed school for four years, and vows she will never leave, despite the wishes of the Crown, which says she has no right to be there.

Wairau and several supporters have been occupying the former Ōpoutama school site near Māhia in Hawke’s Bay since it closed in 2005.

Perspective with Heather du Plessis-Allan: Is this the moment National started to win the election?


All right, it was either a rogue poll, or it was the moment National started to win this election. I think there's a good chance it's the latter.

If National is now winning the election, it will be because they have finally started talking about the things they're good at: education and crime. Thank you very much to the Mongrel Mob for the latter. Not that annoying "nine new taxes" nonsense that wasn't working.

David Harvey: Not A Right to Silence Issue


How Politicians Misunderstand Highly Nuanced Legal Concepts

The National Party announced a policy that proposes to remove the right to silence that can be invoked by adults who may (or may not) have information surrounding the cause of death of a child under 12.

The term “right to silence” has a number of meanings at law.

Richard Prebble: Does Luxon know something we don’t?


Commentators are puzzled by Christopher Luxon’s determination to rule out a deal with TOP.

Perhaps Luxon knows something they don’t.

Political parties commission much more sophisticated polling that reveals who their supporters are and what might change their minds.

Andrew Dickens: A Government before Christmas is unlikely


The other day Christopher Luxon sent conniptions through the commentariat by saying we'll be lucky to have a Government by Christmas.

I'm not surprised.

So we have an election on November 7th. Writ day is December 3rd – that's the deadline for all the votes to be counted.

Peter Williams: How to fix the Overhang Problem


The Mixed part of MMP is the problem. Make our electoral system proportionately pure.

Ideas about how to negate the overhang in the MMP voting system have been punted regularly in the last week.

The Political Editors at both Stuff and the New Zealand Herald must have had a beer one night and decided together this dreadful, unfair, immoral and unfair tactic (sarc) must be stopped. The next day, October 17, both wrote columns decrying the concept and suggesting ways to ensure it can’t happen again.