The Olympic Officials hit back on the outrage defending both their decision and the men boxers. They sought to make the men boxers the victims. We were dismissed as bigots.
Putting men into the boxing ring with women is supposedly inclusive. It is not. It is women hating. No one would sanction those fights who cared for women and for women’s sports.
It is violence by men against women. It is not sport.
The women fighters could easily have been permanently injured or killed.
You can put a man in a dress. He’s still a man. You can dress misogyny in inclusion. It is still misogyny.
Our overlords hate women. They are out to destroy them. There is no other way to view what is happening.
They are women haters. They are men haters too. And they hate transvestites. Why else would they go to such lengths to stigmatise transvestites through their women hatred.
But it is deeper than that. They love power. And to have that power they must weaken us. Hence them telling us lies as truth. Vice as virtue. Up as down. And day as night.
Women hatred? How about this one?
https://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/sex-offender%E2%80%99s-supervision-continue
At 18 Pierre John Parsons tied up a 12-year-old girl in a public toilet and violently raped her.
Parsons admitted having sex with a disabled teenager and molesting a 4-year-old.
But Parsons has transitioned to a woman. And so the authorities all the way down to the Otago Daily times refer to Parsons as she, as in, “she tied up a 12-year-old girl in a public toilet and violently raped her”.
No she didn’t. He did.
See the trick? Woman rapist. Nope. Man rapist. Parsons is no more Trans than I am a one hundred metre world sprint champion. He’s a sexual predator and opportunist.
Let’s say it bluntly. Parsons is illustrative of the opportunist rapist Prime Minister Luxon is inviting into our wives’ and daughters’ changing rooms and toilets. And indeed, Luxon is using the power of the state to stop us men and the police from using necessary force to stop them.
It is Luxon because he could put an end to the madness today — if he chose to.
We can’t. We will do what it takes to protect our womenfolk. But that means jail for us.
There was a lovely lady in my electorate who opened her house up each month as a safe place for transvestites to meet and share concerns. I had a standing invitation as the local MP. Some months my best evenings were spent at these meetings.
The transvestites were without doubt the most empathetic, sweetest souls I have ever met. Their world made my world seem easy and trouble free. Many were prostitutes. They were constantly abused by men.
This was 20 years ago. I was taken aside and warned of the radicals hijacking the transvestite cause for political purposes. I didn’t understand the warning. I do now.
I got very close to Georgina Beyer. We would train together for charity dances. I would lift her up over my head with her terrified I would drop her. I never did. We had so much fun and became good friends. This was when the Labour Party had fallen out of love with her and she had fallen out of love with the party.
We never talked about transgenderism in all that time. It just wasn’t a thing. But she never ever said she was a woman. She knew exactly who she was. She was a man who desperately wanted to be a woman. She was very respectful of both men and women.
I liked her and enjoyed her company very much. I tell all this to explain that transvestites are very much victims of the ideological inclusion cult. We all are. Transvestites are suffering the blow back from opportunist rapists declaring themselves women and dud sportsmen who get a thrill out of beating women and destroying their sport.
The Olympics are women hating top to bottom. So is our government and corporations touting their inclusion credentials. They will say they are not. But we see the male boxers beating women and the pedophile rapists being allowed into female toilets and changing rooms.
Oh there are those who just want to keep their job and be socially accepted. But that doesn’t excuse them. They put their jobs and social status above the prevention of serious harm to women and girls.
We all need to put on our brave pants and stick up for women. Women too need to do it. And Chris Luxon needs to find a pair.
It is violence by men against women. It is not sport.
The women fighters could easily have been permanently injured or killed.
You can put a man in a dress. He’s still a man. You can dress misogyny in inclusion. It is still misogyny.
Our overlords hate women. They are out to destroy them. There is no other way to view what is happening.
They are women haters. They are men haters too. And they hate transvestites. Why else would they go to such lengths to stigmatise transvestites through their women hatred.
But it is deeper than that. They love power. And to have that power they must weaken us. Hence them telling us lies as truth. Vice as virtue. Up as down. And day as night.
Women hatred? How about this one?
https://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/sex-offender%E2%80%99s-supervision-continue
At 18 Pierre John Parsons tied up a 12-year-old girl in a public toilet and violently raped her.
Parsons admitted having sex with a disabled teenager and molesting a 4-year-old.
But Parsons has transitioned to a woman. And so the authorities all the way down to the Otago Daily times refer to Parsons as she, as in, “she tied up a 12-year-old girl in a public toilet and violently raped her”.
No she didn’t. He did.
See the trick? Woman rapist. Nope. Man rapist. Parsons is no more Trans than I am a one hundred metre world sprint champion. He’s a sexual predator and opportunist.
Let’s say it bluntly. Parsons is illustrative of the opportunist rapist Prime Minister Luxon is inviting into our wives’ and daughters’ changing rooms and toilets. And indeed, Luxon is using the power of the state to stop us men and the police from using necessary force to stop them.
It is Luxon because he could put an end to the madness today — if he chose to.
We can’t. We will do what it takes to protect our womenfolk. But that means jail for us.
There was a lovely lady in my electorate who opened her house up each month as a safe place for transvestites to meet and share concerns. I had a standing invitation as the local MP. Some months my best evenings were spent at these meetings.
The transvestites were without doubt the most empathetic, sweetest souls I have ever met. Their world made my world seem easy and trouble free. Many were prostitutes. They were constantly abused by men.
This was 20 years ago. I was taken aside and warned of the radicals hijacking the transvestite cause for political purposes. I didn’t understand the warning. I do now.
I got very close to Georgina Beyer. We would train together for charity dances. I would lift her up over my head with her terrified I would drop her. I never did. We had so much fun and became good friends. This was when the Labour Party had fallen out of love with her and she had fallen out of love with the party.
We never talked about transgenderism in all that time. It just wasn’t a thing. But she never ever said she was a woman. She knew exactly who she was. She was a man who desperately wanted to be a woman. She was very respectful of both men and women.
I liked her and enjoyed her company very much. I tell all this to explain that transvestites are very much victims of the ideological inclusion cult. We all are. Transvestites are suffering the blow back from opportunist rapists declaring themselves women and dud sportsmen who get a thrill out of beating women and destroying their sport.
The Olympics are women hating top to bottom. So is our government and corporations touting their inclusion credentials. They will say they are not. But we see the male boxers beating women and the pedophile rapists being allowed into female toilets and changing rooms.
Oh there are those who just want to keep their job and be socially accepted. But that doesn’t excuse them. They put their jobs and social status above the prevention of serious harm to women and girls.
We all need to put on our brave pants and stick up for women. Women too need to do it. And Chris Luxon needs to find a pair.
Rodney Hide is former ACT Party leader, and Minister in the National-ACT Government from 2008 to 2011. This article was first published HERE
15 comments:
The decay of our society is on full display. Politicians are the worst offenders as they prance around in their Rainbow gear celebrating diversity day but ignore the thuggery when Posie Parker attempted to promote an alternative view. Real men step in when women are assaulted but that expression of chivalry is outdated in this new world of woke.
"And Chris Luxon needs to find a pair" - Probably been a while since he saw them and no surprise that he probably has no idea that he's mislaid them.
If a man ‘identifying as a woman’ follows my 11 year old daughter around the mall then slips into the women’s toilet behind her, the dirty SOB will soon find out that I identify as Tyson Fury.
Until the female athletes start to stand up for themselves and boycott any and all events where the cheating, misogynistic men are, nothing will change. They have already lost the second these sickos enter their sport category, so it is mind-boggling they choose to try and compete against them.
As for the wider issue - the government are cowards. The question is why are so many people of influence so desperate to deny biological facts and not just enable, but encourage what is clearly a mental illness, fetish or perversion, or combination of all 3.
Women do not have penises
Men do not have vaginas, breasts, and can’t breastfeed, menstruate or go through menopause
Sex is binary. Period.
A small child calls out an imposter from a mile off - why aren’t our politicians and business leaders?
The woman boxer who said NO deserves the gold medal. She has it from me.
I agree 100% with the sentiments expressed here but for goodness sake do not destroy your own credibility by getting simple facts wrong. The Olympic boxer issue involved NOT a man parading as a woman (so-called 'trans' woman) but a woman born a woman with an XXY karyotype (chromosomal complement) the Y chromosome being added through a boo-boo during fertilisation. Most individuals with this karyotype present phenotypically (physical appearance and physiology) as men but some present as women. There have been cases of such women winning Olympic medals since the 1930s (discovered in retrospect). The proportion of such woman in Olympic medal tallies is higher than in the general population because that little Y thingummy imparts muscular development that gives them an advantage over other women.
I recall being taught in 1972 that such women were identified through a karyogram (chromosome map) and were forbidden from competing in the Olympics but don't quote me on that (about 98% sure but not 100).
Luxon can not stop this. It is applied postmodernism and it's been brewing in academia and getting dished out to institutions over the last 5 decades. It is global and pervasive and revolutionary but will, hopefully, eat itself once its absurdities become apparant.
It's just silly to couch this issue as being about "women hating." When people frame it this way, what they are keeping themselves safely within the progressive liberal paradigm, but it is the progressive liberal paradigm that is the problem.
While this case is a little bit unique from the majority of "transgender in sport" cases, the correct argument is not "this is bad for women" it is in fact "there are no transsexuals, so there is no question of them ever competing against biological women."
If you want to take it further, women shouldn't be boxing other women either. Women are quantitively and qualitatively different to men, so they should not be bashing the shit out of each other in a boxing ring.
>"Women are quantitively and qualitatively different to men, so they should not be bashing the shit out of each other in a boxing ring."
Good on ya Mme Blavatsky. Perhaps some day people at large will realise that 'equal' does not mean 'the same'. Keep up the good fight and more may notice.
Responding to Barend Vlaardingerbroek at 9.55am - you are wrong. Intersex always has dominant biological sex markers. This athlete is a man. His reasons for attempting to woman-face are irrelevant and make him no different to any other man encroaching on our language, sports, spaces & rights.
Wrong, Anonymous. She was registered as a girl at birth. And while most XXY genotypes present as male phenotypes, some present as females. Don't take my word for it, Google it and make sure the site you go to for clarification is scientifically authoritative.
Why is boxing even a sport? Why agree to be belted round the face and generally have the sh*t beaten out of you. In any other circumstance it is assault. I know. I was recently assaulted. It has left me terrified. Oops too personal.
Let's bring back the gladiators human on human. You laugh? Apparently it was great fun.
Wrong Barend. Being erroneously registered as a girl in a developing country that struggles to deliver the basics, let alone put resources into understanding a minority issue, doesn't make him a girl. Having fragments of girl bits or underdeveloped boy bits doesn’t make him a girl. He was and is a male. His punching power proved why he failed biochemical tests 2 years in a row. He is a danger to female opponents. End of.
From 1968 until 1999 every female athlete had to have a chromosone test to prove they were female. For various reasons this testing was dropped, and testosterone testing was later introduced. Tests were not imposed for males for the very real reason that differences in gender were not likely to drive advantages, fairness or safety issues. For all the apparent problems with the earlier tests, today’s tests based on passports and birth certificates must be seen to be hopelessly inadequate. Contents of passports are at the whim of the government of the competing country and manipulable in circumstances the competing country is opportunistically covering up gender. Tests based on birth certificates are clearly misleading in other circumstances where intersex could be involved as I would assume that in the majority of cases male or female gender is assigned at birth for objective reasons based on the specific conditions of the baby whether or not they are intersex and in some cases it may not be clear that the baby is intersex. The father of the Algerian boxer has purported to counter criticism by stating that she has been female since birth and this statement has been fastened on by the IOC as supposedly putting the issue to bed. However, the statement could clearly be misleading and only a half-truth as even if she has always lived as a female she may still be intersex. Also possibly obfuscation is the athlete’s only response to questions about whether she has been tested in an interview. My understanding is that she refused to confirm or deny this. The very real safety and fairness issues at play as a result of not just transsexuals being included as women but also others with a range of chromosonal and hormonal variations have been acknowledged for many years and only recently has it been deemed acceptable to try to deny them. While the rumours of the results of chromosomal tests undertaken by the IBA are still only that, the information provided by the athlete herself and her father have done nothing to allay concerns that a difference exists. Passport and birth certificate tests just to not seem to provide acceptable criteria but rhe IOC has decided attack is the best form of defence approach and appears to be completely out of order. What would have been so wrong with showing some respect for 50% of the population by acknowledging that there are objective reasons people may think the existing criteria are inadequate and undertaking to investigate and consult on this further before the next Olympics?
Thank you for the clarification. Only a karyogram can definitively solve the riddle. The IOC should revisit the abandonment of that test. If she is intersex, she should be disqualified - back to the old rule.
Post a Comment