I sat in the gallery for a couple of hours yesterday morning, the highlight of which was the cross examination of a police detective by the Tamaki’s barrister, Ron Mansfield KC.
It was absolutely fascinating for many reasons which I’ll detail below. I am not a lawyer though, so my impressions are those of a layman and may be far from the mark. I’m also extrapolating broader defence strategy from the microcosm of one cross-examination so make of my opinion what you will.
My biggest take away is that “attack is the best form of defence.” It was abundantly clear from Mr. Mansfield’s line of questioning that it is not the Tamakis on trial at all, instead it is the State, culpable for overreach. Three years after the offences the Tamakis are accused of occurred it is my opinion that the State and its corrupt instruments would have been wiser to drop these prosecutions altogether.
Because Mr. Manfield is casually, effortlessly, precisely, exposing their corruption.
For me it was cathartic. I sat in the gallery yesterday morning silently screaming and it took almost two hours for Mr. Manfield to mention something I wanted him to: that the Tamakis were obviously singled out and targeted. I can barely describe the relief I felt when he did. Let me explain.
The job of the detective concerned is to analyse video footage to identify crimes and people. She was tasked with analysing the footage shot in the Auckland Domain in November of 2021, where a huge demonstration against Covid lockdowns was attended by thousands of people. The footage was, she dissembled, supplied to police by the Auckland Museum.
But here’s the thing. IN ALL THE FOOTAGE SUPPLIED BY THE MUSEUM THE CAMERAS WERE FOLLOWING THE TAMAKIS AROUND. There were thousands of demonstrators yet the museum’s cameras were zooming in and out and panning, always keeping the Tamakis in frame.
Finally, after two hours of Simon silently screaming from the gallery Mr. Mansfield asked the right question and it emerged that police had placed an officer inside the museum to operate the cameras in the days beforehand. So all the while Brian Tamaki was negotiating the logistics of the demonstration with Police Commissioner Andrew Coster and Deputy Wally Haumaha in good faith, the police were undertaking a covert operation to fit him up.
Mr Mansfield explored this in some detail. The dialogue below is my memory of the exchange and is not verbatim.
Because Mr. Manfield is casually, effortlessly, precisely, exposing their corruption.
For me it was cathartic. I sat in the gallery yesterday morning silently screaming and it took almost two hours for Mr. Manfield to mention something I wanted him to: that the Tamakis were obviously singled out and targeted. I can barely describe the relief I felt when he did. Let me explain.
The job of the detective concerned is to analyse video footage to identify crimes and people. She was tasked with analysing the footage shot in the Auckland Domain in November of 2021, where a huge demonstration against Covid lockdowns was attended by thousands of people. The footage was, she dissembled, supplied to police by the Auckland Museum.
But here’s the thing. IN ALL THE FOOTAGE SUPPLIED BY THE MUSEUM THE CAMERAS WERE FOLLOWING THE TAMAKIS AROUND. There were thousands of demonstrators yet the museum’s cameras were zooming in and out and panning, always keeping the Tamakis in frame.
Finally, after two hours of Simon silently screaming from the gallery Mr. Mansfield asked the right question and it emerged that police had placed an officer inside the museum to operate the cameras in the days beforehand. So all the while Brian Tamaki was negotiating the logistics of the demonstration with Police Commissioner Andrew Coster and Deputy Wally Haumaha in good faith, the police were undertaking a covert operation to fit him up.
Mr Mansfield explored this in some detail. The dialogue below is my memory of the exchange and is not verbatim.
Mr Manfield: Were you also tasked with identifying people in video footage from the Black Lives Matter protest which occurred in Auckland around this time?
Police witness: No.
Mr. Mansfield: Were any police tasked with identifying people in video footage from the Black Lives Matter protest which occurred in Auckland around this time?
Police witness: Not to my knowledge.
Mr Manfield: Were you also tasked with identifying people in video footage from the Groundswell protest which occurred in Auckland around this time?
Police witness: No.
Mr. Mansfield: Were any police tasked with identifying people in video footage from the Groundswell protest which occurred in Auckland around this time?
Police witness: Not to my knowledge.
Mr Mansfield: Other than the defendants was anyone else identified at any of these rallies breaching Covid lockdown restrictions?
Police witness: Only at the Freedom and Rights protest in the Domain.
Mr. Mansfield: Was anyone other than the defendants in this case prosecuted for breaching lockdown restrictions?
Police witness: One other person, also at the Freedom and Rights protest. But other people received warning letters.
Mr. Mansfield: How many other people received warnings?
Police witness: Eleven.
Mr. Mansfield: You’re telling me eleven people received lockdown breach notices? In the entire country?
Police witness: That is my understanding, yes.
So there we have it. My understanding of this testimony is the only video footage from demonstrations the police examined as part of their investigations were those involving the Freedom and Rights Coalition. And of the thousands upon thousands of people who attended those demonstrations, the only people identified and prosecuted were Brian and Hannah Tamaki, and their friends.
I expect there will be more cross-examinations like this as the trial continues but to me it is case closed: the Rule of Law such as it was during Covid clearly breached New Zealand human rights. Leaving that rather significant fact aside for a moment, a fundamental principle of democracy is Equality Before the Law and in this case it is abundantly clear that the Tamakis are not guilty of the crimes that have been fabricated to prosecute them or at least, not any more guilty than anyone else. It seems to me they are instead guilty of publicly defying the will of then-Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and her Establishment cronies are committed to using any legislation that can concoct to prosecute them for it.
Simon Anderson is a technology consultant and citizen photojournalist based in Auckland. This article was first published HERE
3 comments:
I recall that during lockdown, Honi Harawera openly drove from the far north to Auckland and back to visit his sister, with photos shown on social media. He was not prosecuted. He was in effect bragging that he is above the law. Gangs also openly breached covid restrictions and also managed to control who else could use roads. Their membership increased because young people saw they were above the law as well. Jacinda's wedding DJ could not only travel in and out of the country at will, but he also breached MIQ requirements without consequence. It comes down to the socialist saying, all are equal but some are more equal than others.
Jacinda severed her time in the Eastern Block and picked up the skills of the Socialist police states who function like Fascist and Socialists.
They the Left still control the Media because this is not in the press much.
It should be central to all debate.
Considering all the prohibitions of lock downs etc may not have been as good at preventing deaths as is claimed then the whole thing is a farce and blatant discrimination .
I don't agree with quite a bit of what Brian says but he was courageous to defy ' the source of all truth'. Best of luck and God Bless you.
Post a Comment