Well, well, well, it looks like the Waitangi Tribunal’s ivory tower is finally getting a shake-up. The government has announced a review into the tribunal’s role, and ACT’s David Seymour isn’t mincing words, calling it ‘activist’ and out of control.
About bloody time! For too long, this unelected, self-important body has strutted around like it’s the ultimate arbiter of all things Māori – lording it over New Zealand with a sanctimonious air that’d make even the most pious preacher blush. The truth is, we reached Peak Māori years ago, and the public is fed up with the endless pandering to what the late, great, Sir Bob Jones called “Māori wonderfulness”. The tribunal’s had its day – it’s time to wind it up and send it packing.
Let’s not sugarcoat it: the Waitangi Tribunal has gotten too big for its britches. Established in 1975 to investigate breaches of the Treaty of Waitangi, it was meant to be a mechanism for addressing historical grievances. Fair enough – some of those grievances were real and settlements were needed. But most of those settlements are done, dusted and banked. So why is the tribunal still here, puffing out its chest like it’s the Supreme Court of Māoridom? It’s morphed into a bloated bureaucracy, poking its nose into every policy it fancies and acting like it’s above parliament itself. Newsflash: you’re not a court and you’re definitely not the boss of us.
David Seymour’s got it bang on. The tribunal’s become an activist outfit, weaponised by iwi, grifting lawyers and a judiciary that’s drunk the cultural Kool-Aid. It’s not just meddling – it’s actively undermining the democratically elected government. Take the recent kerfuffle over the Regulatory Standards Bill. Māori claimants, egged on by the tribunal, screamed that it’d breach the Treaty and cause “significant prejudice”. Really? A bill that hasn’t even been drafted yet? That’s not justice: that’s clairvoyance dressed up as jurisprudence. The tribunal granted an urgent hearing on 6 June, knowing full well it loses jurisdiction once the bill hits parliament. It’s a desperate power grab, plain and simple.
And let’s talk about that jurisprudence for a sec. The tribunal loves to act like it’s a proper court, handing down lofty pronouncements as if they’re binding law. But here’s the kicker: there’s almost no legal expertise on that panel. It’s a mishmash of academics, iwi reps and Treaty enthusiasts who wouldn’t know a legal precedent from a pōwhiri. They’re not interpreting law: they’re inventing it, spinning Treaty principles into whatever suits their narrative. Former ACT leader Richard Prebble saw through the charade, resigning in March because the tribunal was “creating endless grievances” and turning the Treaty into a “socialist manifesto”. Good on him for calling it out.
So, what’s the review about? Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka and Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith are leading it, with a report due by March 2026. They’ll look at the tribunal’s role, functions, and whether it’s still fit for purpose. Spoiler alert: it’s not. With most Treaty settlements finalised, the tribunal’s original job is done. Keeping it around is like paying a builder to sit on your finished house, looking for cracks that don’t exist. Shane Jones, NZ First’s Māori affairs spokesman, nailed it when he told the Guardian the tribunal’s become an “unnecessary impediment” to lawmaking, bogged down in “legalistic, highly litigious” nonsense.
The left will wail, of course. They’ll cry ‘racism’ and clutch their pearls, claiming this review is an attack on Māori rights. Rubbish. This isn’t about denying history; it’s about stopping a runaway train that’s derailing democracy. The tribunal’s own reports, like its scathing take on Seymour’s failed Treaty Principles Bill, show it’s more interested in grandstanding than delivering justice. That bill, by the way, was voted down 112-11, proving even parliament’s sick of the tribunal’s moralising.
Here’s the bottom line: the Waitangi Tribunal’s had a good run, but it’s time to pull the plug. It’s not a court, it’s not elected and it’s not above the law. The review must be bold – recommend winding it down and redirecting its resources to something useful, like infrastructure or healthcare. New Zealanders want a government that governs, not one kowtowing to an activist clique pretending to speak for all Māori. Seymour’s right to call it out, and the sooner we clip the tribunal’s wings, the better. Let’s move on from Peak Māori and get back to being one nation, not two.
Cam Slater is a New Zealand-based blogger, best known for his role in Dirty Politics and publishing the Whale Oil Beef Hooked blog, which operated from 2005 until it closed in 2019. Cam blogs regularly on the GoodOil - where this article was sourced.
David Seymour’s got it bang on. The tribunal’s become an activist outfit, weaponised by iwi, grifting lawyers and a judiciary that’s drunk the cultural Kool-Aid. It’s not just meddling – it’s actively undermining the democratically elected government. Take the recent kerfuffle over the Regulatory Standards Bill. Māori claimants, egged on by the tribunal, screamed that it’d breach the Treaty and cause “significant prejudice”. Really? A bill that hasn’t even been drafted yet? That’s not justice: that’s clairvoyance dressed up as jurisprudence. The tribunal granted an urgent hearing on 6 June, knowing full well it loses jurisdiction once the bill hits parliament. It’s a desperate power grab, plain and simple.
And let’s talk about that jurisprudence for a sec. The tribunal loves to act like it’s a proper court, handing down lofty pronouncements as if they’re binding law. But here’s the kicker: there’s almost no legal expertise on that panel. It’s a mishmash of academics, iwi reps and Treaty enthusiasts who wouldn’t know a legal precedent from a pōwhiri. They’re not interpreting law: they’re inventing it, spinning Treaty principles into whatever suits their narrative. Former ACT leader Richard Prebble saw through the charade, resigning in March because the tribunal was “creating endless grievances” and turning the Treaty into a “socialist manifesto”. Good on him for calling it out.
So, what’s the review about? Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka and Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith are leading it, with a report due by March 2026. They’ll look at the tribunal’s role, functions, and whether it’s still fit for purpose. Spoiler alert: it’s not. With most Treaty settlements finalised, the tribunal’s original job is done. Keeping it around is like paying a builder to sit on your finished house, looking for cracks that don’t exist. Shane Jones, NZ First’s Māori affairs spokesman, nailed it when he told the Guardian the tribunal’s become an “unnecessary impediment” to lawmaking, bogged down in “legalistic, highly litigious” nonsense.
The left will wail, of course. They’ll cry ‘racism’ and clutch their pearls, claiming this review is an attack on Māori rights. Rubbish. This isn’t about denying history; it’s about stopping a runaway train that’s derailing democracy. The tribunal’s own reports, like its scathing take on Seymour’s failed Treaty Principles Bill, show it’s more interested in grandstanding than delivering justice. That bill, by the way, was voted down 112-11, proving even parliament’s sick of the tribunal’s moralising.
Here’s the bottom line: the Waitangi Tribunal’s had a good run, but it’s time to pull the plug. It’s not a court, it’s not elected and it’s not above the law. The review must be bold – recommend winding it down and redirecting its resources to something useful, like infrastructure or healthcare. New Zealanders want a government that governs, not one kowtowing to an activist clique pretending to speak for all Māori. Seymour’s right to call it out, and the sooner we clip the tribunal’s wings, the better. Let’s move on from Peak Māori and get back to being one nation, not two.
Cam Slater is a New Zealand-based blogger, best known for his role in Dirty Politics and publishing the Whale Oil Beef Hooked blog, which operated from 2005 until it closed in 2019. Cam blogs regularly on the GoodOil - where this article was sourced.
28 comments:
Looking at the makeup of those carrying out the investigation, how on earth can one expect anything different from what we already have?! The bias is already clear.
Cameron Slater's critique of the Waitangi Tribunal is undeniably bold and thought-provoking, challenging long-standing institutions and sparking necessary debate. His call for a comprehensive review aligns with a growing sentiment that it's time to reassess the Tribunal's role in modern New Zealand. However, while Slater praises former ACT leader Richard Prebble for stepping away in protest, one might argue that Prebble's continued involvement could have provided a platform to influence change from within. This mirrors the approach of Māori MPs who, despite historical grievances with parliamentary systems, chose to participate actively to advocate for their communities. Engagement, even within flawed systems, often paves the way for meaningful reform.
Just get rid of it.
It doesn’t need to stick around for any reason.
“Established in 1975 (under a Labour government) to investigate breaches of the Treaty of Waitangi, it was meant to be a mechanism for addressing historical grievances”.
Its ORIGINAL brief was to hear and recommend ‘claims’ post 1975 as pre1975 claims had been FULLY and FINALLY SETTLED in the 1930’s and 40’s via the courts.
But once again, under a Labour government, the 1985 Treaty of Waitangi Amendment Act gave permission to the Waitangi Tribunal to override the Courts fully and finally settlement claims and investigate historical claims/grievances back to 1840.
This taxpayer funded apartheid corporation set up to benefit part Maori only, breaches Article three of the Maori language treaty (The Treaty), while the grievance industry grifters scream about HONORING THE TREATY.
Nothing will come of this. The National party has shown it wont stand-up to maori.
Nothing short of it's COMPLETE abolition will restore any faith in this once National supporters book!
Luxon has seriously ' fouled' the brand in his tenure 🤦♂️
All very true and well said Cameron, but I worry that the group entrusted with looking at the tribunal, may in fact not be trustworthy and that the fox is being put in charge of the hen house. I base this on nothing more than the surnames of some of the members that are not entirely Anglo-Saxon and who might in fact sympathise with the tribunal and act to further entrench its powers.
Yep, the vast majority of the good people have had a guts full of these racists.
With so many generous incomes at stake there will be huge incentive to organise another civil revolt threatening hikoi. Knowing that I am not counting on the review being very sweeping.
After the debacle of the ACT TP Bill and the uncertain situation
of tikanga as part of the 2011 MACA law, many people feel this WT enquiry is already a stitch-up with a pre-determined outcome = more status and power for the WT.
Minister Potaka is heavily involved in all these laws and enquiries.
Well said, Cam.
You've got it absolutely right. The Tribunal has become the enemy within.
A truly progressive move would be to end all official recognition of race or ethnicity in all legislation.
With race/ethnicity no longer having official status, there could be:-
NO more race-based seats or race-specific party in Parliament.
NO more race-based wards in local government.
NO more census questions about ethnicity.
NO more co-governance, and NO more basis for claims of unending victimhood.
NO Waitangi Tribunal !
NO racial apartheid !
This is more likely a Trojan horse being foist upon us. My prediction is the tribunal will come out of this review with legal powers to compel the government of the day to follow it's directives.
Anyone that thinks it will have its wings clipped is a fool.
The comments above casting doubt on the effectiveness of this long overdue activity are 100% correct. Potaka, Goldsmith and National with Luxon at the helm will steer this into the ground on the strict instructions of their iwi masters. Nothing short of the repeal of the Treaty of Waitangi Act, abolition of the Tribunal. the complete removal of co-governance and a return to sanity will make this Country whole again. Well, that lot would be agood start but who is holding their breathe? I'm not!
Correct - Luxon, Potaka and Goldsmith have taken charge of the outcomes of key Coalition-proposed legislative issues and enquiries. In so doing, they have ensured the continued path of He Puapua by 2040 latest for all future govts (right or Left). Concurrently, no opportunity is permitted for NZ citizens to express their voices. This is no mean achievement !
For the last 50 years the Waitangi Tribunal has been punishing me for the never substantiated crimes of my great great grandparents against the great great great grandparents of the part Maori of today.
And the Tribunal wants to continue punishing my great great grandchildren into perpetuity.
It has to stop right now.
As an ex National voter, I will never vote for them again until the Waitangi Tribunal is removed - and nor just replaced with similar power under a different name.
As I posted yesterday:
After the Treaty Principles fiasco I suspect the review will advIse the original legislation fell short, that the tribunal should have sovereign status as it represents the indigenous people of Aotearoa and that while the elected parliament should continue and represent the foreigners ie non indigenous, it will be advisory only and self funded. This will truly represent the treaty. Non-indigenous can have passports issued but they will identify them as such. In addition they will pay a non- indigenous residential tax as well as a property oc upation tax. Corporates are indigenous only if accepted by the indigenous review board ( no appeals) otherwise they too will be subject to a foreigners regime.
May 10, 2025 at 1:40 PM
That could well be the recommendation in June 2026 - but will Luxon /Nat dare to pass it into law before the election? Risky.
Three Cheers, Anon !
My hopes of National supporting anything that serves to put NZ back on a unified cultural track are at an all time intense low. However, this is NZ First’s big chance to turn words into action before the next election. It’s their policy. I suspect some review members may have worked with Shane before when he was involved in fisheries. Shane, the ball is in your court. Winston, this is a legacy-making opportunity for NZ First. What’s needed now is little short of a miracle. Let the process (or will it be “farce”?) commence. Funny, but I find I’m humming quietly: “I get knocked down, but I get up again…”
To Anon 10.07 A massive class action law suit could be one effective avenue for redress? Filed by NZers whose voice is brutally silenced by a treacherous government.
Anyone else notice that the people looking at the Waitangi Tribunal are the least neutral, biased ones they could pick ?
Yeah, look over there, not over here strategy.
But, as in all these Coalitions deals, National has taken over and imposed its strategy - with Goldsmith and Potaka in charge. The 2011 MACA law and the Treaty refs in legislation are other examples.
Anon 12:40 - do you know anyone who might have the expertise to step forward to run this class action ?
Is there any recent immigrant lawyer who might ask why he and his children are being punished for someone else's "crimes" ?
Working for change from inside has merit - but Prebble was clear about his reason for resignation: the WT Strategic Plan was a mirror of the He Puapua agenda. He considered there is no further time to lose in addressing this urgent and dangerous situation.
Such people exist - but they must be ready to terminate their future legal career in NZ. An immigrant lawyer may get further... i.e. not a coloniser.
I have absolutely no faith in Tama Potaka. It’s not going to end well.
We should be asking Winston and Seymour why no NZF or ACT participation is mentioned, are they still out the back having a punch up over the TPB? NZF in particular, why have you abdicated what is your policy to the likes of Goldsmith and d*ckh**d Potaka?
Post a Comment