No, it doesn’t rank above Hong Kong and Singapore, which routinely rank as the two jurisdictions with the most economic liberty.
But it deserves praise for rising so far and fast considering how the country was mired in statist misery just three decades ago. That’s the story of this great video, narrated by Johan Norberg, from Free to Choose Media. It’s runs 56 minutes, but it’s very much worth your time.
But just in case you don’t have a spare hour to watch the full video, I can tell you that it explains how New Zealand made a radical shift to free markets in key areas such as agriculture, trade, fisheries, and industry.
I wrote about New Zealand’s shift to a property rights-based fisheries system, which is a remarkable success. But I’m even more impressed that the country, which has a very significant agricultural sector, decided to eliminate all subsidies. I fantasize about similar reforms in the United States.
To give you an idea of New Zealand’s overall deregulatory success, it is now ranked first in the World Bank’s Doing Business.
As a fiscal policy wonk, my one complaint is that the video doesn’t give much attention to tax and budget policy.
Which is an unfortunate oversight because there’s a very positive story to tell. In the early 1990s, the government basically imposed a nominal spending freeze. And during that five-year period, the burden of government spending fell by more than 10-percentage points of GDP.
And because policy makers dealt with the underlying disease of too much spending, that also meant eliminating the symptom of red ink. In other words, a big deficit became a big surplus.
The same thing also has been happening this decade. Outlays have been increasing by an average of less than 2 percent annually. And because this complies with my Golden Rule, that means a shrinking burden of spending.
And there’s also a good story to tell about tax policy. The top income tax rate has been slashed from 66 percent to 33 percent, and the capital gains tax has been abolished.
Let’s close by highlighting what should be the main lesson of the video, namely that any country can rescue itself from economic decline.
As I watched, the first thing that occurred to me is that New Zealand’s reforms are – or at least should be – a road map for Greece to follow.
The Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World shows the history of economic liberty in the two nations, and you can see that they used to be very similar – in a bad way – back in the 1970s. They began to diverge between 1975 and 1985, mostly because policy got even worse in Greece. Then both adopted better policy started in 1985, but New Zealand went much farther in the right direction.
Policy has been generally stable in both nations this century. That’s acceptable for New Zealand, but it’s basically a recipe for continued misery in Greece.
But the good news is that Greece can simply copy New Zealand to get the same good results.
P.S. Remember when Gary Johnson caught grief for being unable to list any admirable foreign leaders. I defended him by pointing out that there are not any obvious choices in office today, but I did mention that Roger Douglas and Ruth Richardson – both prominently featured in the above video – would be on list if it included former politicians.
P.P.S. New Zealand ranks #3 for total human freedom, trailing only Hong Kong and Switzerland.
Daniel J. Mitchell is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, who specializes in tax reform.
But it deserves praise for rising so far and fast considering how the country was mired in statist misery just three decades ago. That’s the story of this great video, narrated by Johan Norberg, from Free to Choose Media. It’s runs 56 minutes, but it’s very much worth your time.
But just in case you don’t have a spare hour to watch the full video, I can tell you that it explains how New Zealand made a radical shift to free markets in key areas such as agriculture, trade, fisheries, and industry.
I wrote about New Zealand’s shift to a property rights-based fisheries system, which is a remarkable success. But I’m even more impressed that the country, which has a very significant agricultural sector, decided to eliminate all subsidies. I fantasize about similar reforms in the United States.
To give you an idea of New Zealand’s overall deregulatory success, it is now ranked first in the World Bank’s Doing Business.
As a fiscal policy wonk, my one complaint is that the video doesn’t give much attention to tax and budget policy.
Which is an unfortunate oversight because there’s a very positive story to tell. In the early 1990s, the government basically imposed a nominal spending freeze. And during that five-year period, the burden of government spending fell by more than 10-percentage points of GDP.
And because policy makers dealt with the underlying disease of too much spending, that also meant eliminating the symptom of red ink. In other words, a big deficit became a big surplus.
The same thing also has been happening this decade. Outlays have been increasing by an average of less than 2 percent annually. And because this complies with my Golden Rule, that means a shrinking burden of spending.
And there’s also a good story to tell about tax policy. The top income tax rate has been slashed from 66 percent to 33 percent, and the capital gains tax has been abolished.
Let’s close by highlighting what should be the main lesson of the video, namely that any country can rescue itself from economic decline.
As I watched, the first thing that occurred to me is that New Zealand’s reforms are – or at least should be – a road map for Greece to follow.
The Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World shows the history of economic liberty in the two nations, and you can see that they used to be very similar – in a bad way – back in the 1970s. They began to diverge between 1975 and 1985, mostly because policy got even worse in Greece. Then both adopted better policy started in 1985, but New Zealand went much farther in the right direction.
Policy has been generally stable in both nations this century. That’s acceptable for New Zealand, but it’s basically a recipe for continued misery in Greece.
But the good news is that Greece can simply copy New Zealand to get the same good results.
P.S. Remember when Gary Johnson caught grief for being unable to list any admirable foreign leaders. I defended him by pointing out that there are not any obvious choices in office today, but I did mention that Roger Douglas and Ruth Richardson – both prominently featured in the above video – would be on list if it included former politicians.
P.P.S. New Zealand ranks #3 for total human freedom, trailing only Hong Kong and Switzerland.
Daniel J. Mitchell is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, who specializes in tax reform.
2 comments:
You herald the slashing of spending as a advantage to New Zealand whilst ignoring the degradation of our health and educations sectors not to mention the plummeting standard of living the majority enjoy. No government campaigned on removing our free primary and secondary education system or downgrading our free health care. But these outcomes are the result of the fiscal impropriety that has beset New Zealand in the past thirty years.
The vast majority of kiwis are worse off not than we were and after 8 years of record migration to prop up the improper stewardship of the New Zealand economy, the middle and lower classes are fed up with toiling for no progress.
To claim a successful economy based on property speculation and migration is disingenuous. Migration is low set up but huge running cost being born by the struggling ratepayers as National have washed their hands of paying for any although they gloat about the success it brings. And the way we trade in houses and land in this Country is wrong. For people to make large sums of money through land banking and renovating whilst paying little to no tax cannot be justified by any moral compass.
Farm produce is sold to Kiwis based on international prices. But when a natural disaster devastates their farms, income and revenue, the government bails them out with taxpayer funded welfare. This is the one good reason where the consumer i.e the taxpayer, deserves a better deal, but will never get one. To claim the farmers can degrade the environment without paying any tithe to clean up the mess is elitist and myopic. Polluters need to pay to clean up the mess or else existence is threatened.
Everything is assessed back to how much money it will make. Where down the track have we got greed focused?
As for Greece, they should said, pharque you to Germany and the World Bank, as should every country who are being held to ransom by the fake credit generated. If all debt was excused tomorrow, the entire world would be in a better place. Economically it may be even better. Computer generated credit is inhumane.
I suspect that a large portion of New Zealand's population would doubt, from their personal experience, that pro-market reforms do, or have ever done, them much good. This is more or less pure ideology from a right wing think tank, unfortunately. Debt is massive, poverty and homelessness and inequality increasing, carbon emissions ever increasing, but of course the rich are richer, so all is well!
Post a Comment