For too long, New Zealanders have watched in silence as governments of all stripes have chipped away at the principle that every citizen should stand equal before the law. The steady advance of race-based governance, special rights, parallel systems, and political power granted on the basis of ancestry has gone virtually unchallenged by the everyday New Zealander. That era has to end. This country won’t fix itself, and it certainly won’t return to democratic equality if the public continues to whisper their frustrations privately while remaining silent publicly.
New Zealanders need to be far more forthright in defending a single, unified system of government. The creeping trend toward co-governance, race-specific policy, and constitutional preferences didn’t happen overnight — it happened because the public allowed politicians to trade away equal citizenship piece by piece while hoping someone else would push back. Appeasement hasn’t worked. In fact, every time a government has yielded to activist pressure, the demands have intensified. That alone should tell us that silence is not a strategy. Silence is surrender.
This is not about ordinary Māori people. They, like everyone else, want secure families, honest government, and a fair shot at success. The real issue is the machinery of race-based politics that has been built and entrenched over the past several decades. A political industry has grown around the idea that different ancestry entitles people to different political influence. That philosophy is fundamentally incompatible with democratic equality. And yet it has been permitted to take root because too few New Zealanders were willing to call it out plainly.
The result? Increasing pressure for co-governance in public services, separate representation mechanisms, race-based consultation rights, and, most concerning of all, attempts to reinterpret — or even rewrite — constitutional arrangements through the back door. These pressures will not subside on their own. They will only stop when the wider public stops tolerating them.
New Zealanders must rediscover the courage to speak openly. Not in coded language, not in apologetic whispers, but directly and without fear. We must insist that all public authority — Parliament, local government, the courts, and every ministry — serves the entire public, equally and without favour. New Zealand cannot function as a modern democracy if political rights depend on who your ancestors were. That path leads only to division, resentment, and permanent political instability.
Being forthright means demanding that politicians stop making decisions based on which group can mount the loudest accusation of historical grievance. It means rejecting any proposal that divides the country into hereditary categories. It means telling every political party, without ambiguity, that race-based governance has no place in the future of this nation.
It also means refusing to be intimidated by claims that defending equal citizenship is somehow “racist” or “colonial.” That accusation has been used for years to silence debate, and far too many people have fallen for it. Standing for civic equality is not extremist — it is the foundation of Western democracy. Every liberal society is built on the idea that the law applies equally to all. New Zealanders who defend that principle are not the problem; they are the last line of defence against a system that would permanently fracture our country.
The time for polite avoidance has passed. Ordinary New Zealanders — workers, small business owners, retirees, parents — must begin saying clearly that the future of this nation will not be carved up according to ancestral lines. If we want a country that treats every citizen fairly, then we need to push back, boldly and consistently, against any attempt to entrench racial preference in governance.
New Zealand belongs to all of us. And it is up to all of us to speak up, stand firm, and ensure that our democracy remains grounded in one timeless principle: one people, one law, one standard for every citizen of this nation.
Geoff Parker is a passionate advocate for equal rights and a colour blind society.
This is not about ordinary Māori people. They, like everyone else, want secure families, honest government, and a fair shot at success. The real issue is the machinery of race-based politics that has been built and entrenched over the past several decades. A political industry has grown around the idea that different ancestry entitles people to different political influence. That philosophy is fundamentally incompatible with democratic equality. And yet it has been permitted to take root because too few New Zealanders were willing to call it out plainly.
The result? Increasing pressure for co-governance in public services, separate representation mechanisms, race-based consultation rights, and, most concerning of all, attempts to reinterpret — or even rewrite — constitutional arrangements through the back door. These pressures will not subside on their own. They will only stop when the wider public stops tolerating them.
New Zealanders must rediscover the courage to speak openly. Not in coded language, not in apologetic whispers, but directly and without fear. We must insist that all public authority — Parliament, local government, the courts, and every ministry — serves the entire public, equally and without favour. New Zealand cannot function as a modern democracy if political rights depend on who your ancestors were. That path leads only to division, resentment, and permanent political instability.
Being forthright means demanding that politicians stop making decisions based on which group can mount the loudest accusation of historical grievance. It means rejecting any proposal that divides the country into hereditary categories. It means telling every political party, without ambiguity, that race-based governance has no place in the future of this nation.
It also means refusing to be intimidated by claims that defending equal citizenship is somehow “racist” or “colonial.” That accusation has been used for years to silence debate, and far too many people have fallen for it. Standing for civic equality is not extremist — it is the foundation of Western democracy. Every liberal society is built on the idea that the law applies equally to all. New Zealanders who defend that principle are not the problem; they are the last line of defence against a system that would permanently fracture our country.
The time for polite avoidance has passed. Ordinary New Zealanders — workers, small business owners, retirees, parents — must begin saying clearly that the future of this nation will not be carved up according to ancestral lines. If we want a country that treats every citizen fairly, then we need to push back, boldly and consistently, against any attempt to entrench racial preference in governance.
New Zealand belongs to all of us. And it is up to all of us to speak up, stand firm, and ensure that our democracy remains grounded in one timeless principle: one people, one law, one standard for every citizen of this nation.
Geoff Parker is a passionate advocate for equal rights and a colour blind society.

71 comments:
More NZ citizen distracting racist clap trap.
Mr Parker doesn't give one example of cogovernance or any other Maori favoritism instigated by the coalition government.
Meanwhile NZs:
- ballooning deficit and debt,
- extremely poorly managed finances,
- untouched bloated government staff numbera,
- unnecessary and suspicious government grants to special interest groups,
- strangely protected, price colluding aussie banks, insurance companies, and supermarkets continuing to increase prices whilst kiwi businesses fail in droves,
- record numbers fleeing NZ;
- failure of the NZ government to attract the foreign investment they are seeking (what company would come to nz to pay nefariously elevated energy prices?)
All remain unmentioned!
To The coward who always hides behind "Anonymous" and always has the same inane rant that the Maorification of NZ is not a problem and any attempt to call it is out is just diverting attention of the REAL problem which is greedy corporations. 1) You have NO idea how economics works, and 2) You are completely blind to the on-going take-over of NZ by greedy wealthy elite trace-Maori CORPORATIONS (Iwi) which get HUGE amounts of free taxpayer money AND get all kinds of tax breaks that normal corporations do not get.
Anon at 7.24, With respect, the author is addressing a key underlying cause of the problems stated in your "economy-driven" checklist. Examples:
no 1 ballooning debt: stopping the never -ending Treaty settlements would save billions - as would asking the super -wealthy Iwi to take charge of social benefits to persons of Maori ancestry;
no 4: suspicious grants to special interest groups. Why so much funding for kapa haka? The " booming" Maori economy could easily sponsor this cultural issue;
no 6: record departure numbers. Varius reasons exist for this disturbing trend - but the issue routinely ignored by the media and Left-leaning "academic experts" that that many people - of all ages - see no future in a 2- tier ethnocratic society. Otago University's entry to Medicine and Dentistry ( based on equity not concrete academic results) exemplifies this problem.
So, looking behind your accurate "economic" checklist, deteriorating inequality in NZ society is undoubtedly a major root social cause - simply, the strategy is to make no mention of this.is not mentioned. Worldwide , numerous countries with these race-based problems are unable to develop thriving economies - because their societies are mired in race-based conflicts.
NZ' s is running out of time to avoid this tragic outcome.
Thanks, Sandy. You said it for me !!
Excellent article, Geoff.
All this divisive racist nonsense started in the 1980's and ha pushed it's way into all aspects of our our society.
Truly - New Zealand society is a prime example of the slow boiled Frog syndrome. Softly, softly, catchee monkey !!
Thank you Sandy and thank you Geoff. No economy can operate successfully within a devided society.
Well said, Mr Fontwit.
@Anonymous 7.24am - Comprehension not your strong point then? - nowhere in the article was the Coalition Gov’t singled out, in fact the very first sentence says > ”...as governments of ALL stripes have chipped away....”
As for examples of Co-Governance:
Waikato River Authority
The board is 50/50: five iwi-appointed members and five Crown-appointed members.
Te Urewera (formerly Te Urewera National Park)
Governance is by a Board with both Tūhoe representatives and Crown representatives.
ngaituhoe.iwi.nz
Initially, the board had 4 Crown and 4 Tūhoe members; after three years, it shifts to 3 Crown and 6 Tūhoe.
Whanganui River / Te Awa Tupua
Governance includes a co-governance strategy group called Te Kōpuka, made up of iwi, central & local government, environmental and recreational stakeholders.
Tūpuna Maunga (Auckland Volcanic Cones)
The Authority is jointly made up of mana whenua (local Māori) and Auckland Council members (plus a non-voting Crown rep).
Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust
Its board includes mana whenua (Māori), landowners, and wider community members, and they co-manage the ecological island reserve.
*********************
And examples of “other Maori favoritism”
* Maori-only schools,
* Special Maori content in the education curriculum,
* Maori-only education scholarships,
* Maori-only housing projects,
* Maori-only health initiatives,
* Maori-only welfare initiatives,
* Maori-only prisoner programmes,
* Maori-only positions on government agencies,
* Maori-only consultation rights under the Resource Management Act,
* Maori-only co-management of parks, rivers, lakes, and the coastline,
* Maori-only ownership rights to the foreshore and seabed,
* A special Maori Authority tax rate of 17.5 percent,
* A special Maori-only exemption to allow blood relatives to qualify for charitable status,
* Maori language funding,
* Maori radio and TV,
* Maori-only seats on local councils,
* Maori-only appointments onto local government committees,
* Maori-only local government Statutory Boards,
* Maori-only local government advisory committees,
* Maori seats in Parliament,
I rest my case :)
Once again, Mr Fontwit, doesn't give one example of cogovernance or any other Maori favoritism instigated by the coalition government (Finace Minister Willis' suspicious $48m gift to kapa haka is the exception).
Meanwhile in the world of facts and truth...
Dr David Wilson, NZ First MP gives an excellent speech on the illegal Aussie owned, NZ banking cartel.
Aussie banks stole $8b excess profits from struggling Kiwis this year!
Think about that number when you're feeling outraged at the NZ taxpayer distracting Maori bashing articles. Minister Willis has budgeted a mere $500m for addressing Maori issues this year!
Funding for Maori IS REPEATED EVERY YEAR and is at least $1.16-billion, and is on top of other funding distributed through Health, Housing, Social Development, and Education.
https://sites.google.com/site/treaty4dummies/home/race-based-funding-cost
That was published in 2012 - 2013, so that is 12 years that we know of, of at least $1-billion = $12-billion
Then on top of that there is all the dodgy Claims settlements that in March 2024 = $4.6billion, all listed here > https://sites.google.com/site/treaty4dummies/home/treaty-settlements-list
As for your "Maori bashing" inference - Fair minded New Zealanders do not "Maori bash". They simply fight for democracy and to oppose all forms of racism in New Zealand and the fake history of our country on which so much of it (racism) is based.
Anonymous @7.24am & 9.16am tries to downplay the Maori takeover of NZ - but noted public figures like Winston Peters and Don Brash acknowledge it > A discussion between Don Brash and Winston Peters published in the NZ Listener around 2017 - the MAORI PREFERENCE HAS ESCALATED SINCE THEN.
“After I had finished my testimony, I left the committee room. Mr Peters followed me out and suggested coffee. I said, "you know Winston, this racial preference thing is the MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE facing the Government right now". He corrected me: "No," he said, "it's the MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE facing the country right now." I believe he meant it.”
Anonymous@7.24 is an excellent example of what is wrong with this country, being completely blind to the social and political realities that are driving NZ towards apartheid, if we aren't already there. The very existence of the Breaking Views web site is the best evidence there is that there is evil in paradise and it is being addressed. The views expressed here show the extent of the problems we face. Anon@7.24 can have his views but the tenor of them is tantamount to cancel culture: don't give me uncomfortable truths, just shut up and take your medicine. Yeah, right!
I comment on this problem more than any other as I see Maorification of New Zealand as a fundamental shift in our society and the way it operates. I agree there are other important issues to sort as well but this one is the single, most tragic trajectory to be on. This is because democracy and harmony depends on equality. There are many ways to address poverty and hardship. No ethnicity has a monopoly on poverty and hardship that couldn't be addressed by the Government in a fair and unbiased manner. To disrupt our social cohesion by injecting race-based privileges, as listed by the commenters above is unforgivable and short-sighted.
Bring the 80 plus books about New Zealand history that has been moved from libraries, schools and universities, back into the public arena plus books which are being currently written. One such book, the title which speaks volumes, is Forbidden History, by John Dudley Aldworth, is just such a book! I can understand why certain individuals do not want us to know the truth about our history and those who do. A country which has no truth to its history has no future.
Kevan
Does Mr Parker really think $0.5b budgeted to address Maori issues is more important than the $8b excess profits stolen off Kiwis by the Aussie banks?
Or are Mr Parker and pals trying to fool Kiwis into getting outraged about Maoris so they take their eye off the iniquitous cause of their crippling cost of living?
Maori have huge advantages. We have allowed them immense cancellation power whilst they largely escape any concerning cancellation however extreme the expressed attitudes. Extensive networks based on family, tribal, kapa haka connection and the network of Insurgency Coordination Centres (marae) and tens and tens of millions of govt subsidy support. Many maori seem to have time on their hands and many are in education and state and Council employment where vast paid time can be devoted, officially or not, to promotion of matters maori. The European colonist derived population is too busy, too naive, too brainwashed, and too afraid of cancellation to seriously counter.A serious effort needs to be made to harness the Asian and Indian communities who with their newspapers are well placed to be organised. I suspect few are sufficiently connected to realise the extent to which they along with other colonist and descendants of, are being blatantly discriminated against in a myriad fields.
When the public does speak out forcibly against co governance type arrangemnts, as in the submissions on the Waitakere Ranges Deed of Acknowledgement, the submissons are not reported by the msm, even when effective..
Geoff your article states "increasing pressure for co-governance in public services, separate representation mechanisms, race-based consultation rights, and, most concerning of all, attempts to reinterpret — or even rewrite — constitutional arrangements through the back door."
Yet all your references and examples of Maori favoritism were instigated pre 2023 and go back as far as the 1980s.
Your claim that funding is repeated every year is also true for $8b a year excess Aussie bank profits which you have thus failed to acknowledge is a much greater problem for Kiwis than fighting supposed democratic wrongdoings by the coalition government, wrongdoings you have failed to articulate.
Here is a press release by Ipsos on The Most Pressing Issues Weighing New Zealanders Down in Aug 2025.
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/AK2508/S00982/what-are-the-most-pressing-issues-weighing-new-zealanders-down-issues-monitor-out-now.htm
Funny but Maoris and Maori funding don't get a mention. Inflation and cost of living do get a mention, in fact they are by far Kiwis greatest concern.
Why don't you investigate and report where the incredible amount of kapa haka funding ends up. It beggars belief a government who rejected $75m to fund an Americas cup (which puts NZ centre stage for high tech and management expertise, and advertises NZ to the world's wealthy) agrees to fund kapahaka to the tune of $48.7 million over three years plus $34 million over two years.
You might find Nic Willis' kapa haka funding is less of a racial problem, and more a corruption problem. Not unlike the ongoing Aussie: bank, supermarket, and insurance NZ super profits the ongoing, taxpayer distracting, racist rhetoric attempts to cover up.
Come on Geoff. My reply isn't illegal or abusive. I merely state facts and ask questions. Isn't this a site for free speech? Or has Nic Willis become the new Daniel Carter.....
Aren't we allowed to tackle Carter now?
Well said, 1.36 Anon. Really puts into perspective the issues that matter to everyday kiwis. Imagine the good that could come from the middle and lower classes unifying around this stuff to fight back against the oligopolies and corrupt politicians, instead of getting distracted by endless meaningless culture war nonsense.
Anonymous @1.36pm says > “Funny but Maoris and Maori funding don't get a mention (in IPSOS survey).
No, it is not funny, like you, many people in NZ are blind,ignorant or apathetic to the Maori takeover of NZ and the consequences of tribalism (the antithesis of Democracy).
Again nowhere in the article did I single out the Coalition Gov’t, but you seem obsessed with it? However a prime example of wrong doing by this regime that you asked for, in most NZers view, would be the ‘spiking’ of the ‘Treaty Principles Bill’. Then not holding nationwide public, binding referendums on 1) Abolishing the separatist Maori Seats. 2) Abolishing the racially biased Waitangi Tribunal. 3) Restoring Crown ‘ownership’ of the foreshore & seabed. 4) Legislating all Freshwater resources to be ‘owned’ and managed by the Crown.....
Getting back to Race-Based funding , take a browse here https://kiwi-frontline.proboards.com/board/85/funding-race-based of over 300 recorded entries and yes the recording apparently stopped in November 2024, but rest assured the funding has not, some examples:
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/533594/ratana-pa-to-receive-10m-boost-to-fix-failing-marae-buildings
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/541012/shane-jones-threat-to-cut-future-funding-for-waitangi-trust-over-powhiri-disruption
https://www.teaonews.co.nz/2024/09/16/parihaka-to-recieve-58-million-for-infrastructure-upgrades/
https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/2462m-rif-funding-east-coast-and-hawke%E2%80%99s-bay
$8 - Billion will be chicken feed when you wake up one morning and find tribalists in control of NZ and clipping the ticket on everything that moves, and if it does not move they will poke it with a stick until it does.
“when you wake up one morning and find tribalists in control of NZ and clipping the ticket on everything that moves”. It seems the shape of debate has fallen away a little at this point.
There is no evidence to suggest this is anything that could possibly happen. I get hyperbole as a means of ridicule, but it is usually accompanied by humour, or at least a supplementary realistic reference point.
The divisive culture war fiction distraction is working magic on some, while the banks, fossil fuel companies, grocery oligopolies, and power conpanies rob us blind.
Long unqualified list from the commenter at 9.06am. I will provide the missing context: policies aiming to support Māori are responses to a long history of dispossession, health crises, exclusion, and discrimination unique to Māori compared to other ethnic groups in New Zealand, grounded in a history of colonization and systemic injustice rather than unearned privilege.
@Anonymous1.36pm - My research shows ‘ the four major Australian-owned banks operating in New Zealand pay tax @ 28% on their NZ-made profits (Combined NZ tax paid: roughly $1.6–$2.0 billion in corporate income tax. Whereas Maori corporations pay little or no tax due to many/most registered as charities, those that are not registered as charities pay only 17.5% (another Maori privilege).
Now it is your turn to list what you believe are " long history of dispossession, health crises, exclusion, and discrimination unique to Māori"
@Anonymous 7.24am - Claiming that the Māori takeover narrative is just a “smokescreen” while other issues are happening, is misleading and a typical pro-maori response.
These Maori issue developments in political and economic influence are real and consequential, not a distraction.
Highlighting them is a legitimate discussion about how New Zealand is governed — it doesn’t prevent attention to other national concerns.
Claiming that the Māori takeover narrative is just a “smokescreen” while other issues are happening, is a fair, accurate statement backed by evidence and supported by the vast majority of everyday kiwis - as outlined in this thread and supported by evidence. My eyes and ears are open to the things affecting our nation. It is outrageous and I’m voting with my vote on election day.
Speaking of open eyes and policies and actions that have disaffected Maori, here’s a primer on a politician and his policies that were enacted.
John Bryce (1833–1913) was a New Zealand politician who served as Minister of Native Affairs from 1879 to 1884. He is notably remembered for his harsh policies toward Māori land issues. Bryce favored strict legal actions against Māori who resisted land alienation and was responsible for the violent invasion of the pacifist Māori settlement at Parihaka in 1881. He led troops to Parihaka, where the settlement was destroyed and its leaders, Te Whiti and Tohu, were arrested and imprisoned without trial for 16 months. Bryce introduced legislation to imprison Māori protesters without trial and pursued policies that facilitated Māori land sales and reduced government spending on Native Affairs.
Hey Geoff, the 1867 Native Schools Act prioritised English instruction and aimed to phase out Māori language use. By the early 20th century, it became common for Māori children to be punished—sometimes physically—for speaking Māori at school, including in classrooms and playgrounds.
Hey Geoff, the 1955 Adoption Act institutionalised adoption practices that effectively severed Māori children's ties to their culture and families through closed, secretive processes, ignoring traditional Māori adoption practices and whakapapa, and causing lasting harm.
Hey Geoff, the New Zealand Settlements Act 1863 allowed confiscation of land from Māori tribes deemed to be in rebellion, leading to loss of ancestral land, disruption of social structures, and undermining of Māori sovereignty.
Hey Geoff, the Tohunga Suppression Act 1907 outlawed Māori traditional spiritual experts (tohunga), suppressing indigenous knowledge.
Hey Geoff, local segregation policies (not formal acts but enforced by local councils in some regions) segregated Māori in schools, seating, and public facilities, reinforcing marginalisation and snuffing out societal connection.
Hi Geoff I’m still only part way what you asked for but I’ll keep popping them up to read.
There was separate Census for Māori (1877–1951). Māori were classified and counted separately and experienced exclusion from full citizenship benefits such as pensions until 1945.
Geoff. The Maori corporations aren't taking $1600 in excess profits from every man, woman, and child on NZ every year.
The Maori corporations aren't charging higher interest rate margins in NZ so Kiwis pay $500,000 more than aussies for the average mortgage
The Maori corporations dont spirit $8b in excess profits away for Australians to enjoy each year.
The Maori corporations aren't stopping other businesses operating in NZ because the costs are too high (NZ just lost large fonterra manufacturing buainesses to Overseas interests) .
Which is why most Kiwis don't give a stuff about the Maori issue now Luxon's coalition is in control. Seymours regulatory standards bill will hopefully make it more difficult for the next Labour government to run amok with their maori tax money laundering schemes when they make an unwelcome return.
There is a reason the treaty principles bill was introduced to the NZ public. I'll bet dollars to donuts that bill will appear again nearer the end of the coalitions 3rd term. It will also be needed to combat Labours Maori tax money laundering schemes. The bill will create unrest the coalition doesn't need right now and it's frankly not needed whilst Luxon and Co are in charge, so.its best kept on ice until it's really needed.
So in short, we're right to keep an eye on the Maori issues, especially when Labour returns to.power. but not because of most Maoris, because of the taxpayer swindling politicians and their Maori taxpayer money laundering partners.
Which brings us nicely back to Willis, her mysterious $48m grant to kapa haka, and her ongoing support for the cost of living crisis causing aussie: banks, insurance companies, and supermarkets.
https://sites.google.com/view/kiwifrontline/enlightenments/parihaka
https://sites.google.com/view/kiwifrontline/enlightenments/maori-language-forbidden-at-school
https://sites.google.com/site/treaty4dummies/home/the-new-zealand-settlements-act-1863
https://sites.google.com/site/treaty4dummies/home/tohunga-suppression-act
Post up your evidence of this - not someones opinion
Hey Geoff, the history snippets posted for you are very beneficial, if you would like to know more, there is a treasure trove out there for the reading. With online access you don’t even need to visit Auckland museum or Te Paoa. Keep clear of the cooker blog websites, such folk who creat those tend to only participate in echo chambers, and are more immune to fresh opinions than they are to common measles ;)
1898 Pension Act
Funded from general taxation, the amount on offer was small. Applicants had to meet certain criteria to qualify for a pension of at most £18 per year (equivalent to $3200 today).
Only those with an annual income of £34 (about $6000) or less and property valued at no more than £50 ($8800) received the full amount. Proof was required that the applicant was aged at least 65, which disadvantaged the many Māori whose births had not been registered. Under this criteria many non-Maori would have missed out as well.
Applicants had to have lived in New Zealand for the previous 25 years, but Chinese were specifically excluded.
Apirana Ngata wrote on land rates and tax > * IN TIMES PAST, RATES WERE NOT LEVIED ON MAORI LANDS. This was not because of the Treaty of Waitangi. LIKEWISE IN DAYS GONE BY MAORI LANDS WERE NOT AFFECTED BY TAXATION and again it was not because of any provisions in the Treaty. The Treaty had provided for "all the rights and privileges of British subjects". If the law had adhered to the spirit of the Treaty, Maori land would have borne the burden of rates and taxation long ago. IT WAS IN THE YEAR 1894 THAT MAORI LANDS WERE SUBJECTED TO RATES AND THEN IT WAS HALF OF THE RATE AND IT WAS NOT UNTIL 1910 THAT FULL RATES AS FOR EUROPEAN LANDS, WERE LEVIED.
IT WAS ONLY IN THE YEAR 1893 THAT MAORI LANDS WERE TAXED, IT WAS A LIGHT TAX, HALF OF THE TAX PAYABLE BY THE PAKEHA. However, only leasehold Maori lands were taxable. It was in the year 1917 that a heavier tax was levied on leased Maori land equivalent to half the rate of taxation on European lands.
"The Maori corporations aren't taking $1600 in excess profits from every man, woman, and child on NZ every year." - by not paying there fair share in rates they are probably taking more from every man, woman and child in NZ every year....
"we're right to keep an eye on the Maori issues, especially when Labour returns to.power. but not because of most Maoris, because of the taxpayer swindling politicians and their Maori taxpayer money laundering partners.." - it is elite maori activists driving this > Maori nationalists have gained significant power in New Zealand for two main reasons.
FIRSTLY they persuaded the government to adopt biculturalism as a defining feature of New Zealand life and then positioned their influential supporters in the public service, academia, religious establishments and other powerful institutions.
And SECONDLY, they have persuaded successive governments to generously settle their never-ending questionable claims for public resources under the guise of historic and modern-day breaches of the Treaty of Waitangi. This policy of appeasement has resulted in billions of dollars and significant power being transferred to elite Maori activists.
When combined with dedicated Maori seats in Parliament, a woke media and education system that pushes their propaganda, and little opposition, they have been able to push this country slowly but surely towards an APARTHEID STATE.
https://sites.google.com/view/kiwifrontline/enlightenments/how-did-maori-gain-so-much-power
How many commentators are involved here - 2 or 3?
Geoff multiple-posting to provide documentary evidence for his claims I can just live with, the Anonymous character who seems to enjoy playing jack-in-the-box I find hard to stomach.
Is there no end to your BS? - so far I have debunked most of your twisted history crap :)
The 1898 Old-age Pensions Act, which was a world first, gave a small means-tested pension to elderly people with few assets who were 'of good moral character'.
Sections 7 and 8 did not exclude Maori .
My research says this Act was not race-based it applied to ALL races > 18 Application of Act to Maoris
An adoption order may be made under this Act on the application of any person, whether a Maori or not, in respect of any child, whether a Maori or not.
Hey anonymous > At the centennial of the Treaty of Waitangi in 1940 Sir Apirana Ngata said “Let me acknowledge first that, in the whole world I doubt whether any native race has been so well treated by a European people as the Maori”
What you have done Mr/Ms Anonymous (@9.16am), is something woke liberals do all the time: fly a moral equivalence argument. This bogus tactic is engaged in to suggest that two unrelated wrongs make a "right," or at least cancel one another out. The alleged $8billion Aussie bank issue has nothing whatsoever to do with separatist race-based funding in NZ.
I'm picking that Anon at 4.43pm, who starts with "Well said, 1.36 Anon" is the same anonymous idiot.
Mr Anonymous @7.24am, my article was about people such as yourself (you are a prime example), who have a concern about issues apparently being:
- ballooning deficit and debt,
- extremely poorly managed finances,
- untouched bloated government staff numbera,
- unnecessary and suspicious government grants to special interest groups,
- strangely protected, price colluding aussie banks, insurance companies, and supermarkets continuing to increase prices whilst kiwi businesses fail in droves,
- record numbers fleeing NZ;
- failure of the NZ government to attract the foreign investment they are seeking (what company would come to nz to pay nefariously elevated energy prices?)
But appear too gutless to publicly air your concern. You would rather ‘whisper’ in ‘comments’ to get your jollies.
So my CHALLENGE to you is to write an article on those issues and post it on BreakingViews under your true name with your photo ID.
You are very mouthy and creative so a 600 - 800 word article should not be too much trouble - BUT do you have the cojones?
Professor Robert Mc Cullough wrote articles then received threats from MPs, got blocked out of senior government positions, was set up and vilified by the loathsome Sean Plunkett, so now Prof M is leaving NZ.
Have you read interest.co.nz today? Willis response to the Finance and Expenditure Committee's banking competition inquiry report, is to write to banks to “encourage them to consider” disclosing profitability on transaction, on-call, and savings accounts.
Willis pointed out there's no law to compel the banks to do this, but banks would have to explain themselves to the public if they refused.
The dumb and dishonest Willis either doesn't know she is responsible for making and changing the law, or she is a pathological liar. I expect it's a combination of both.
Ps. When good men do nothing, evil pervails.
I dont enjoy writing these posts but I can't stand by and watch 5 million people being fooled into blaming the actions of dishonest politicians and Australians on Maoris.
You are clever enough to look into the information and ideas I supply so I'm surprised you arent. You'd soon realize the Maori issues are present but pale in comparison to corrupt NZ MPs ruining kiwis lives.
Your article has prompted some good discussion and im seeing more posters wake up to the Maori/ oligopoly / corrupt mp subterfuge running their lives.
Now we just need more retired BV authors to figure it out, corrupt mps have less opportunity to ruin retirees lives.
@anonymous 8.15am, LOL, so you are too much of a coward to take up my challenge, IMHO you are a loathsome creature and should be denied access to BreakingViews comments.
Geoff, if it weren't for the Anonymouses and Unknowns, most commentary slots would remain empty..........
@Annie @8.51am, still making stuff up I see " into blaming the actions of dishonest politicians and Australians on Maoris." - nowhere in my article did I mention Australians.
And elite activist, sovereigntist maoris are fully to blame for the maori takeover of NZ, yes they have intimidated politicians and use them as puppets, but only treasonous fools such as yourself excuse these opportunist lowlifes.
Annie @ 7.24am writes > "More NZ citizen distracting racist clap trap." Unquote
The most racist people are the ones crying "racist" all the time.
Excellent article Geoff, shame our biased media will not publish it
Geoff, I am self represented AGAINST the first rehearing of the recent quashed MACA ( Seabed and Foreshore ) High Court Judgements as an original party and submitter. The initial hearing is an opportunity to demand specific evidence from the applicants because they have relied on Tikanga etc to bulldoze a compliant judiciary . The hearings will carry on for years. I appreciate your comments. I am from a pakeha multi generational fishing family . Thank you for your contributions.
Back and forth, back and forth the arguments go. Mostly the theme seems to be that this country is populated by two societies, being those of Māori ancestry and everyone else. As far as I can see there are a number of different races and cultures who live here and most would consider themselves New Zealanders. We elect a government every three years which has the task of governing all of us, without prejudice.
Personally I cannot envisage see any advantage in us evolving further into a two-tier society, and I doubt that any honest survey would disagree.
Now, can we move on?
Thank you Basil, NZ needs more of your calibre and knowledge to stand up, in return I thank you for your representation in the MACA rehearing.
Geoff, relax mate you are spot on the money. The other chap is your typical far left whining basket case who spends to much time reading stuff for his news.
The Aussies cartel funded propagandists are out in force today attemping to spread racial discord to cover up their great Kiwi theft.
At first I thought you were one of the propagandists Geoff but your dragging up of pre 2023 Maori Mumbo Jumbo to tar the Aussie Cartel supporting Luxon coalition now leads me to believe you're just a good old fashioned racist!
Kiwis aren't buying the propagandists any more and they have had enough, expect the current flood of leavers to turn into a tsunami.
@Anonymous Nov 19, 8.15am, sorry your race card has been declined - do you have another form of argument? :)
@Anonymous Nov 19, 8.15am, further, I and many if not most NZers would argue that it is you and your woke pro-maori ilk that are dragging up the Aussie Bank rort to smokescreen the Maori takeover of New Zealand - which is by far a bigger issue.
$0.5b budgeted fto fix Maoris social issues this year, $8b excess profits spirited back to Australia by banks alone.
How is your investigation into Nic Willis' $48m taxpayer funded grant to a kapa haka festival which costs $5.7m to run and recieves $7m income going?
Or are you worried the true cause of your concerns is corruption and not the racism you have poured your heart and soul into?
Classic racist, play the man and not the ball!
Post a Comment