“The governments of Western Europe, and the United States and Canada, New Zealand, and Australia did this on purpose to their own people. They opened their borders and paid for the rest of the world, the Third World, to move into their countries.”
Those words are not from a fringe blogger or an anonymous forum. They come from Tucker Carlson, and they sit at the centre of his new documentary Replacing Europe: Following the World’s Deadliest Migration Route.
New Zealand, Australia, the United States, and Canada all receive a direct mention.
That alone should make people here pay attention. If you have followed my work for any length of time, you will know I have written repeatedly about replacement theory. It is routinely dismissed as a conspiracy theory, a thought crime, or a “far right talking point”. However, what was once denied outright is now unfolding in plain sight, in real time, and at scale.
Mass migration Is reshaping the West
This is not about compassion versus cruelty. It is about numbers, policy, incentives, and outcomes.
Mass migration is reshaping Western nations at a speed never seen before. Housing, wages, infrastructure, social cohesion, crime, and political representation are all being altered permanently. And this is not accidental.
Replacing Europe follows one of the deadliest migration routes on Earth, from Africa to the Canary Islands, through Spain and France, and ultimately into the United Kingdom.
The filmmakers do not rely on pundits or studio debates. They speak directly with migrants, local residents, and government officials. What emerges is uncomfortable, confronting, and impossible to ignore.
European governments are not merely tolerating this transformation. They are facilitating it. They are funding it. They are encouraging it. This is not ideology. It is reality.
Why this matters to New Zealand
Do not make the mistake of thinking this is a European problem.
New Zealand is explicitly named because we are running the same experiment, with the same logic, and the same long term consequences. Rapid population growth through immigration is treated as an unquestionable good, while dissent is pathologised and silenced.
If you are told replacement is not happening, ask why governments are importing people faster than infrastructure can cope. Ask why public concern is dismissed rather than addressed. Ask who benefits, and who bears the cost.
Mass migration Is reshaping the West
This is not about compassion versus cruelty. It is about numbers, policy, incentives, and outcomes.
Mass migration is reshaping Western nations at a speed never seen before. Housing, wages, infrastructure, social cohesion, crime, and political representation are all being altered permanently. And this is not accidental.
Replacing Europe follows one of the deadliest migration routes on Earth, from Africa to the Canary Islands, through Spain and France, and ultimately into the United Kingdom.
The filmmakers do not rely on pundits or studio debates. They speak directly with migrants, local residents, and government officials. What emerges is uncomfortable, confronting, and impossible to ignore.
European governments are not merely tolerating this transformation. They are facilitating it. They are funding it. They are encouraging it. This is not ideology. It is reality.
Why this matters to New Zealand
Do not make the mistake of thinking this is a European problem.
New Zealand is explicitly named because we are running the same experiment, with the same logic, and the same long term consequences. Rapid population growth through immigration is treated as an unquestionable good, while dissent is pathologised and silenced.
If you are told replacement is not happening, ask why governments are importing people faster than infrastructure can cope. Ask why public concern is dismissed rather than addressed. Ask who benefits, and who bears the cost.
Replacing Europe shows what many governments would prefer you never see.
The documentary is available exclusively by signing up as a member at TuckerCarlson.com.
Watch it. Share it. Then decide for yourself whether this is a “conspiracy theory”, or whether the replacement is already well underway.
Matua Kahurangi is just a bloke sharing thoughts on New Zealand and the world beyond. No fluff, just honest takes. He blogs on https://matuakahurangi.com/ where this article was sourced.
7 comments:
An interview by Tucker of the doco maker.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_2_7fxyIEI
The UN non-binding legal instruments - UNDRIP 2010 and the 2018 Global Compact on Migration - have similar aims: encourage countries to sign up to the " basically acceptable idea" and then let local action - and activism - push for real irreversible change.
The NZ Initiative is fully behind mass immigration here. They are also Luxon's go to think tank.
Other than Monaco, European countries all have below-replacement fertility rates. Across the continent, the average is about 1.4 (cf. 2.1 as the replacement rate).
Immigrant populations tend to exhibit high fertility rates although this often takes a dive after the first generation as the children of immigrants adopt the attitudes and values of the host society.
The real problem is that ethnic Europeans living in their own countries are not reproducing at a high enough level. This makes reliance on immigration inevitable as the population ages.
Some governments have tried to tackle the problem of low fertility through economic incentives but these do not work well - although they do encourage irresponsible people to have more babies so as to collect more support payments. Bludgers producing more bludgers is the last thing we need.
And yet surveys show that there is a fertility deficit in subjective as well as objective terms - most married people would like to have 2 or 3 kids but the costs (especially of accommodation) and loss of income (in most cases, for the woman) are so prohibitive that having a family or an additional child are put on the back burner.
Children are a social good and society needs to take a fresh look at how we (the collective 'we' - ALL of us, not just those who have babies) should ensure that the next generation is produced and nurtured - and that there are enough of them to prevent that 'second demographic transition' that creates a need for large-scale immigration.
I don't see the problem with a low fertility rate, the planet is struggling to support the existing population.
Why make it worse with more children, especially if many of them are accidentally conceived?
Anon 316, there are more than enough resources to go round, the problem is distribution. Some countries where hunger is problem are food exporters such as India. I recall buying broccoli from Ethiopia while living in Holland in the mid-80s when Ethiopia was officially said to be suffering a famine. Likewise, population is not equally distributed but varies enormously from one country to another, and from one region to another within a country, especially a large one. Contrary to the simplistic "too many people" argument, the highest standards of living and lowest incidences of basic resource deprivation are in the countries with the highest population densities.
In the West and some other countries (esp. Japan), we have had a 'second demographic transition' that has seen ageing populations and depleted work forces with unsustainable dependency ratios (welfare beneficiaries to working people). Clearly, this is not a matter of too many babies, but too few.
The whole-planet approach is just about totally uninformative as it glosses over immense variation both between and within countries.
A deliberate ‘great replacement theory eh? Can’t possibly be true. Our various Parliaments are so full of honest, rational, careful and honourable people that…oh wait.. what happened from 2020 to 2025?
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.