It obviously disregarded the fact that many supporters of Peters believe unmitigated immigration allows undesirable migrants to flood the country, the type who think nothing of guillotining a politician or anybody else they disagree with.
All it does is reinforce the stereotype of the violent migrant coming to replace the existing population. This is what Peters is railing against.
And it's happening at the same time as the case of Ann Widdecombe that rocked the UK, a politician who was bludgeoned to death with a hammer for the crime of being a politician.
Now, this was the same example used by people who found Paul Henry's statement about shooting Chris Hipkins distasteful, albeit a joke prompted by some radio jocks.
So, if the Migrant Association thought this stunt would strengthen support for its position, then it has clearly failed. I think it should apologise.
But that doesn't seem likely because, so far, it has defended the stunt as satire, which it wasn't. As Paul Henry discovered, there is nothing funny about suggesting the assassination of a politician.
Andrew Dickens is a broadcaster with Newstalk ZB. - where this article was sourced.

2 comments:
Where is the problem. Culturally these migrants have no problem with killing people they disagree with. As we are a multicultural society, who are we to demand they change.
Yet you are labeled a racist for daring to tell these people, if they don't like it in NZ, they should return to their own country! Go figure
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.