Guest post on The Good Oil by JD
The challenge now is for the silent majority to stand up and display their support for proper equality in NZ.
Not being Māori myself but having married into NZ society I find the great majority of my closest relatives are. A diverse bunch, they lay claim to varying degrees of ethnicity, ranging from my partner who traces unadulterated Māori ancestry back for several generations to those at the other end of the spectrum whose claim seems based on little more than their grandmother having once passed a Māori in the street.
These latter are people who, partly in jest, I refer to as “mini-Māori”.
But here’s the thing. I find often the less Māori ancestry people have the more they seem keen to assert and display it, affecting a range of ostentatious cultural adornment and claiming to speak on behalf of others, irrespective of what those others may themselves prefer.
Paradoxically, whilst many are keen to take on tā moko and moko kauae to display their ethnicity, I see much less evidence of korowai or piupiu in the streets of our cities.
Clearly designer jeans and waterproof clothing are two of the benefits of colonisation that even the most radical amongst us are happy to embrace.
Strange how selective ones acknowledgement of the positives of colonialism can be, but I digress.
In view of the current furore around the idea of Māori rights in NZ, it seems appropriate to ask just how many Māori, of whatever degree, are there in this country?
And here we find some interesting facts emerging. According to RNZ(1), the 2023 census tells us that “the Māori population count is hovering just below 1 million – an increase of 12.5 per cent to 978,246 people compared with 869,850 in 2018 census.”
However the report also goes on to say “This means that 19.6 per cent of the population of Aotearoa have Māori whakapapa, this is different from the number of people who affiliate with Māori as an ethnic group, who make up 17.8 per cent of the population.”
Which tells us the Māori population, those who consider themselves to actually be Māori, numbers just 17.8 per cent of the population, or 888,407 people, which is not significantly more than the 869,850 counted in 2018.
The other 89,839 reported in the census papers who “have Māori whakapapa” but do not “affiliate with Māori as an ethnic group” must be some kind of ‘ghost Māori’, determined by the census bureaucrats to be Māori, even though they themselves don’t recognise it.
All in all, this decision to count as Māori those who don’t think they are I find totally bizarre. But does it matter that the NZ census makes these strange assumptions? The answer is yes, because these claims of one million Māori, nearly 20 per cent of the population of NZ, are often repeated by Te Pāti Māori and the likes of Willie Jackson, TPM’s fifth columnist ensconced at the heart of Labour’s Māori caucus.
Such claims are used as a rationale to justify more governmental power be given to Māori, or, more specifically, to those who claim to know what Māori want.
Even though Māori are no more of a homogeneous group than European, Asian, Pacifica or any other ethnicity living in NZ, there are those who would have us believe that they are. That Māori have one agreed set of goals, and most importantly, only those anointed by tribal elites or John Tamihere and Te Pāti Māori are able to advocate on their behalf and elucidate these goals.
Another prime example of one who displays such hubris is Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, herself a prime example of the ‘mini-Māori’ alluded to earlier. One who, not feeling Māori enough, compensates by stridently pursuing every cause that they personally feel Māori should be happy to embrace.
This is the arrogance, the belief that they know best, and speak for Māori as a whole, that drives Te Pāti Māori with its disregard of parliament, its wild claims of co-sovereignty, its car-kois and hīkois and its hysterical over-reaction to David Seymour’s Treaty Principles Bill.
A Treaty Principles Bill that simply asserts three things:
1. Parliament rules.
2. Everyone is equal under the law.
3. Māori have rights like everyone else and those enshrined in any treaty settlements will be honoured.
Unfortunately, and for personal gain and advancement, Te Pāti Māori would prefer to deny these rather self-evident truths. Instead they claim, with particular reference to item one, that parliament is not sovereign and there should be two states within NZ: one governed by Māori and one for the rest of us.
Even a cursory analysis of this idea shows how nonsensical it is when we ask how would a Māori state within NZ actually work?
Should we have tracts of land which only Māori would inhabit?
Or a separate Māori parliament passing laws that only Māori would obey, levying taxes that only Māori would pay, building roads that only Māori would drive on, hospitals that only Māori would use, universities that only Māori would attend, etc.
To satisfy the inane aspirations of a few radical opportunists, should NZ end up with two of everything? This would be a high ambition indeed when the country currently struggles, and often fails, to properly deliver on any one of the essential services listed above.
Māori sovereignty is a pipe dream, promoted as a classic diversionary tactic to shift the attention of the Māori majority away from the high living enjoyed by Māori politicians and tribal elites, funded from the taxpayer purse and the treaty settlement billions currently under iwi control.
But many Māori, some of my relatives among them, driven in large part by a fear of appearing to be ‘not Māori enough’ have fallen into line with Māori Party doctrine that Seymour’s bill somehow denigrates Māori and is antithetical to the original treaty.
This is unfortunate and ultimately will do much harm to the social fabric of NZ, yet these opinions are gathering momentum, with the slogan “Toitū Te Tiriti”, appearing in public on banners and bumper stickers.
And we should never discount the power of a simple slogan to eventually move political mountains. Think how “MAGA”, or “Get Brexit Done”, or “No taxation without representation”, and many more such phrases have been extremely successful in shifting public opinion and winning political success for those who espoused them.
Which brings me to my final point: are we to allow this Te Pāti Māori con-game to continue unopposed, or are we going to respond with our own slogans in support of the Treaty Principles bill?
If we are, then I offer the following as a first attempt(2). I’m sure there are many others that would do a similar or better job, so the challenge now is for the silent majority to stand up and display their support for proper equality in NZ.
(1) https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/te-manu-korihi/518182/what-the-census-tells-us-about-the-maori-population
(2) The Māori word ake means forever, which seems particularly apt for this slogan. It lends itself to a simple riposte, whenever Toitū Te Tiriti is shouted, ake can be shouted right back.
9 comments:
AKE? Not while there is apartheid legislation still on the books and that false, fake, fraudulent weaponized “English version” of the treaty (te tiriti) used to create apartheid legislation continues to trump the original Maori language treaty.
Wthout knowing what "affiliate with maori" means and how measured hard to draw any conclusions from above. Is it the sum of persons on tribal registers? Very many woud not be. I prefer the term trace maori. Many have inherited genes and eating habits which ensures they far from mini. I am especially intrigued by the ardent pro maori who blonde their hair. it must be grat to be a maori, little constrained by conditions of employment and income. A myrias socia opportunites, a local state funded marae, and freedom to spout political views without ever encountering other than fullsome agreement and encouragement.
I like this article. When I see the red and black faces posters, I have thought about whiting out the words “for te tiriti” and leaving the faces with a big TOGETHER underneath
One could be forgiven for thinking that, by their failure to ask Maori activists how Maori sovereignty would work out in practice, the media are actively fomenting divisiveness, and by implication, ethnic tensions and racism.
I'm on board. Ake! Ake! Ake! It's just that at present some are more Ake! than others.
Queen Victoria's Royal Charter/Letters Patent of 18 November 1840 is our true founding document and first constitution that set up our political and justice system under one law for all. Might I suggest that we use a four-day weekend closest to that date to celebrate International Day, so everybody can celebrate with food, song and dance from their countries of origin and who have come to make New Zealand their home. I suggest that we move Matariki Day (who wants a holiday in the middle of winter?) and Kings Birthday to that weekend? This weekend could also be used to celebrate the coming of summer, sports, gardening, or what have you. It is time to get rid of all racist rorts in this country of ours?
Kevan
Who is going to market these bumper stickers? I'd buy one!
This isn't about race. The treaty specifically mentions māori (lowercase m) which was the Nga Puhi word for "ordinary." The ordinary people of New Zealand is everyone now. Everyone had intermarried and most of those claiming to be politically Māori are more often than not more colonial in their stock than anything else.
The issues aren't those of race but the evil spiritual values of the tribal cultures which oppressed and enslaved the ordinary people of New Zealand prior to the signing of the treaty and the spiritual values of Christianity which led them out of that oppression and gave them the same rights and duties as british citizens, especially the ability to earn and hold property that belongs to them and not the tribe collectively. It lead to the common law which protected them against utu and muru and allowed them to make life choices independent of the chief who previously had total rule over them including decisions of life or death. It was these values and the enforcement of the common law that led to peace amongst all in this country and laid the foundation for a prosperous future.
The population must return to Christianity and its values if there is to be a turn around in the current situation. God punishes disobedience by enslavement. He did it to the Jews when they were the chosen people many times. He did it to the schismatics in Eastern Africa with the influx of Islam. He did it to the Weimar republic and Europe with two world wars. He did it to the Russian schismatics with Communism. We won't be any different.
"Evil spiritual values of tribal cultures" describes the ancient Middle Eastern tribes pretty well, including the tribal Hebrews as they murdered, looted and raped their way across Palestine. They enslaved members of other tribes that they hadn't butchered, including virgin girls who became sex slaves. All this was with the express approval of the Jewish tribal god. Great basis for ethics and morality, that is!
The common law was exclusively English, although it was fed into in the very early stages by Germano-Roman law. Roman law has a history starting in the Roman Republic and extending to the Holy Roman Empire. Many of the early Roman legal and ethical precepts originated in ancient, Pagan Greece.
Note the garbled final para which reveals this writer's jumbled mind. I'd be interested to know what is meant by 'schismatics in Easter Africa with the influx of Islam'. Then again, I doubt whether I would learn anything of any meaning.
Post a Comment