Pages

Sunday, August 31, 2025

Dr Michael Bassett: Our lack-lustre mainstream media


Have you noticed the growing irritation with our mainstream media? Last week Radio NZ was under scrutiny with suggestions it was biased, and statistics showed its listeners were departing in droves. TV3’s main news announcer has been doubling as the weather girl, albeit after a quick change of costume. While its news during weekdays is as good, or bad as ever, it becomes almost non-existent at the weekends. TV One lumbers on, anchored by the redoubtable Simon Dallow, but rumours circulate about his possible departure.

Our newspapers seem to be in a state of collapse. The New Zealand Herald is a pale shadow of its former self. I’m old enough to remember when it, and the Auckland Star, were quality papers: the Star was the spokesman for business and city affairs, the Herald reflective of wider provincial interests and the city’s rural hinterland. Both took a close interest in government, explaining legislation and carrying coherent accounts of the reasoning behind it. Despite there being more than 30 local authorities in and around Auckland before 1989, the papers managed to report significant amounts of news from many councils. Now the Herald can’t even be bothered to report what our one big council is doing unless some kind of crisis occurs. What about all the expensive schemes Auckland Council spends our rates on? Nothing. Excessively expensive road works like the ones that have been going on for months at the top of Kupe St in Kepa Rd, Mission Bay, where it is nigh impossible to see any work ever being done. We get daily evidence of the laziest possible journalism. The sort that can be produced when an unreflective reporter interviews his/her computer and doesn’t stir out of a chair.

Take what has passed for the “news” over the last few days. On Tuesday the ever-so-weak Jamie Ensor’s long article about how Crown board increases in remuneration aren’t being provided for in budgets, amidst assorted loose assertions that services would be seriously cut as a result. Five seconds of reflection would have told him that these small monetary amounts, the first for a decade, would, as the Minister responsible told him, be able to be managed within the large relevant departmental budget. The reporter dribbled on for about a thousand words to impart his inconsequential bulls wool. Today, Friday, the Herald’s lead item is an assertion that high rise plans for Auckland will lead to schools being “swamped” with extra children. Really, what a puerile claim! The high rises will take a long time to materialise. Time to plan extra classrooms. Not building up higher means spreading the boundaries of the city further out, which means new schools and much greater spending on roads and transport. The reporter Ben Leahy gave the issue scarcely a second’s thought. Two pages on, the Herald served up a footling story that a new McDonald’s for Newmarket will be about half a kilometre away from several schools. So?? Then the hapless Jamie Ensor struck again, with a story about MPs’ office rentals in their electorates. No background info about how office rentals have been being paid by the taxpayer to enable better services for the public for the last 40 years, or that the rules don’t seem to have changed!

Increasingly, desk-bound journalists tap out official information requests to ministers and government departments, looking for any sign of advice from public servants and others that runs counter to what a minister or the government has decided to do. Then up goes a cry of stinky fish, whether the counter assertions make any sense or not. Journalists have nearly always been left-inclined politically, and anything that can be manufactured against this Coalition Government is irresistible to many of them. But they need to remember that keeping newspapers relevant to what is going on in society is what will get them read in the long term.

In a few days’ time, ballot papers are going to be mailed out to voters for the local elections. Has Murray Kirkness, the Herald’s editor, not heard about this? Wouldn’t it have made sense for his paper to be debating local issues? What is motivating the large number of contestants for the Auckland mayoralty? Surely a couple of his reporters could have been prised away from their desks to find out?

Newspapers the world over seem to be struggling, although some like the Australian, the New York Times, the Daily Telegraph and the Guardian thrive. They have remained relevant to their readers. Increasingly, New Zealanders are having to get their news from sources other than our newspapers, radio and television. If that ultimately sees papers like the Herald collapse then their staff have nothing else to blame but their own sloppy standards. But we will have lost friends that did a good job in their heyday.

Historian Dr Michael Bassett, a Minister in the Fourth Labour Government. This article was first published HERE

7 comments:

anonymous said...

Question asked for the 100th time:
why does the Coalition tolerate this daily attack by the biased media on their ( very difficult) action ? Clean out on Day 1 after their 2023 victory was necessary. Wait... Goldsmith is the Media Minister.... Luxon's pro-Maori plans must figure somewhere.

balanced said...

Is the lack of risk of exposure by quality journalists making nz more corrupt?

Why aren't Journalists asking why our government isn't interested in finding out who got the $74.4b spent by ardern and co under the guise of covid?

A forensic audit would soon uncover where our money went.

The auditor general (the top auditor in the land) can't/won't follow the money trail to find out who got our money and apperantly that's just fine and dandy.

Why do journalists accept hand wringing by our centre right mps over the obvious covid coverup / perpetrator no show allowed by covid inquiry chair, illingworth?

How can the main perpetrators not be compelled to front up and why isn't the media asking why they're not?

How can our politicians wring their hands, then do nothing about the no shows (they could if they wanted to), without being questioned by journalists (ryan bridge momentarily put the out of depth van velden under the spotlight but didnt challenge her ridiculous answer)?

Who got the $74.4b covid spend, we and our children will pay back for the rest of our lives Mr Luxon?

Or are you as bad as the rest of them?

Ken S said...

If Simon Dallow were to resign tomorrow it would still be 10 years too late.

Anonymous said...

Balanced makes a great point. I feel robbed by this countries msm, hiding the truth, or choosing not to report it, while filling the time with bs stories. I rarely watch the news at all, and get the truth from sites like this. Dr Bassett, this nowadays isn't really news, we all know our msm are far left corrupt reporters. Don't listen or believe a word they say....

Anonymous said...

i have relied on blogsites for many years now to understand what is happening in NZ. Still read the Herald( doesn't take long!)also the Press and the Otago Daily Times. The Conversation, Centrist, Platform even the Daily Blog but it is an acquired taste. One can only take so much.Used to rely on Newsroom but Anne Salmon and her frothing racist lunacy is too much.

Anonymous said...

When you read this article, note that Dr. Bassett 'spends written time on the NZ Herald'.
Now I recall of days gone by that a Canadian import/now domiciled Kiwi, had a "run at the shares listing' for NZ Herald, and when "asked why" - stated that he was not " happy with current editorial content". Do you, reader, recall this.
It took a change of CEO (now Allan Joyce) with our Canadian gent being "promoted " to the Board. Plus others - Phillip Crump noted Lawyer/Political Commentator (has had articles on this website).
No, in reading Dr. Bassett's article am I allowed to ask ' "what change to Editorial content has occurred" - if not/why not?
Now People will say "it takes time"! My response bulls....t, newspapers can change "their skin colour" overnight - and my evidence - The " Public Journalism funding" from the Ardern Govt - the leopards (NZ MSM) very quickly changed their 'spots'.
As to the change at NZ Herald - a myth, that has become a falsehood.

Robert Arthur said...

It is very difficult to follow what the Auckland Council is doing and proposing.The msm were recently prersented with all the submissons on the Waitakere Ranges Deed of Acknowledgement. With a little effort the more comprehensive submissions can be found and would provide basis for a balanced analysis with all the work done. (Try 1606) There are a myriad websites which despite very limited base see to manage deeper covergae and analysis than the msm.