Pages

Thursday, October 23, 2025

Perspective with Heather du Plessis-Allan: Is our climate overhype coming to an end?


There's yet another, frankly welcome, sign that the world's climate overhype may be over, or at least correcting.

The latest is that the Government has announced it's now easing the rules on how much compulsory climate reporting the big listed companies have to do.

Now, I don't blame you if you feel at this minute like your eyes are about to glaze over, but do not let that happen. Because this is actually much more important than it sounds.

This goes back to the bad old days of Jacinda and Grant in 2021, when the Ardern administration brought in rules forcing large, publicly listed companies to report to shareholders the impact that climate change may have on them.

It was world-leading, it was ground-breaking - and it was incredibly expensive.

Turner's, the car company, reckons that their first report, which only runs to seven pages, cost them $1 million to produce.

Some companies have told the relevant minister, Scott Simpson, that it cost them $2 million to produce their reports. And the ones who are getting off easy here are still paying apparently close to $10,000.

Veteran director Joan Withers famously complained about this in July, when she said that climate reporting was taking up more of her time than preparing financial statements, which is the actual thing that shareholders are interested in - and that is completely nuts.

And for all of the money and all of the effort that these businesses were putting into it, not one carbon particle was saved from going into the atmosphere.

It did not bring down anybody's emissions and that was not the point of it. It was simply to talk about it.

And the money was just wasted on paperwork instead of being reinvested into the business to raise productivity, which is the thing that we should be laser-focused on in this country.

Now, I applaud the Government for doing what it has done today, but it does not go far enough, because they've only eased the rules for the smaller companies. So about 88 of them will now not have to report.

But 76 of the big ones are still going to be required to do this utterly pointless, expensive, unproductive exercise.

If it is pointless and expensive and unproductive for the small companies, it is also pointless, expensive and unproductive for the big companies. And the Government should go further than it has today.

Heather du Plessis-Allan is a journalist and commentator who hosts Newstalk ZB's Drive show HERE - where this article was sourced.

6 comments:

Doug Longmire said...

About time !!
The simple FACT is that climate changes all the time, and NOTHING that New Zealand companies do can have any effect upon climate.
For example :-
CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is 400ppm (0.4%)
Human CO2 emissions are only 3% of total global emissions.
Natures contribution to the 400ppm is 97%. (or 388ppm).
Human emissions are just 3% or 12ppm. The other 97% is natural.
New Zealand’s CO2 emissions only 0.17% of human emissions.
So New Zealand’s CO2 emissions are 3% x 0.17% of the total global CO2 emissions each year.
3% x 0.17% = 0.51% !! This is 1 in 20,000.
So the other 99.9949% is generated by all other sources, NOT NZ !!!
i.e. NZ emissions are basically ZERO !!.
So, obviously company's emissions are basically zero !!

Doug Longmire said...

Correcting the math error above :-
3% x 0.17% = 0.0051%

Doug Longmire said...

Or put it another way:-
Using the IPCC data:-
The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is 400ppm.
Human emissions (fossil fuels etc) only produce 3% of this.
New Zealand only produces 0.17% of Human emissions.
SO! New Zealand’s total contribution of CO2 in the atmosphere is
400ppm x 3% x 0.17% = 0.02 ppm which = 2 parts per HUNDRED million.
This is ONE part per 50 MILLION.
The other 49,999,999 parts are other sources – NOT New Zealand.

Now – let’s illustrate just how much ONE part in FIFTY million is:-
Think of a road 50 kilometers long – say the drive from Wellington to Paraparaumu. It takes about 40 minutes steady driving to traverse this distance, along Transmission gully past Paekak etc.
Well this road is 50 km, i.e, 50,000 meters. Imagine that this is a display of the contents of our atmosphere.
Of the 50 kilometers of atmosphere:-
Nitrogen (78%) would be 39 kilometers.
Oxygen (21%) would be 10.5 kilometers.
Argon (0.9%) would be 450 meters
Co2 (400ppm, 0.04%) would be 2 meters.
New Zealand’s contribution (0.02 ppm) is ONE part per 50 million, which is ONE Millimeter on this road
That’s approximately the thickness of my thumbnail.
ONE millimeter in FIFTY KILOMETERS of Road.
That’s how much NZ’s CO2 emissions are in the atmosphere of Planet Earth.

Anonymous said...

All climate reporting needs to go. It is a waste of time and resources. CAANZ and XRB are very woke and spent huge amounts of time and resource on developing standards that are broadly meaningless (eg Scope 3 anything) apart from organisations that wish to proclaim their virtue either as signalling or part of their marketing strategy. I think only activists wishing to bash an organisation are going to read the statements. Better to get charities that are business to be treated the same as businesses and them to be included in transparent reporting.

Chuck Bird said...

Below is a link to a video of Joe Rogan Experience #2397 - Richard Lindzen & William Happer. Dr Happer is being brought to New Zealand by Groundswell and the Methane Science Accord on a speaking tour starting 4 December. The video is over 2 hours but worth the time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zt32chvO_iY

The event list will be available soon. You can read about Dr Happer at the link below.

https://methane-accord.co.nz/events/will-happer-nz-tour

Anonymous said...

Why let the facts get in the way of a climate zealots story? They will NEVER ADMIT that they are mistaken