Pages

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Pee Kay: National… the Enemy Within? (Part Three)


PART THREE: The Luxon Years, The Future, the Battle for New Zealand’s Democracy

On reflection, what made us think Christopher Luxon would be any different from the long line of previous National Prime Ministers who simply failed to hold our democracy dear?

The answer is simple, desperation.

Following six horrific years of the Ardern/Hipkins Labour governments, we were desperate for change. When Luxon looked us in the eye and stated, “We are one country, we deliver our public services to people on the basis of need, not ethnicity,” and “We are all equal under the law,” we believed him!

Voters were lulled into believing a National-led government would arrest our listing economy and immediately terminate the relentless march of co-governance.

We heard exactly what we wanted to hear.

Instead, we received a masterclass in political duplicity. Luxon himself later confirmed that by telling media: “…when you don’t take the people with you, and you don’t frame up what it’s about, as a result you leave people behind and it drives more division.”

The reality is that this National led coalition has sanctioned the militant demands of the tribal elite to such an extent that our country faces a deep racial division that could take decades to correct. Our democracy has been completely warped by a political party behaving like a Trojan horse.

The moment they secure power they turn their backs on the will of the people to push a hidden agenda.

The only time National ever steps in with a quick fix, such as their 2025 coastal law U-turn, is when public outrage threatens their polling numbers.

If they remain on this course, National will continue to campaign like the centre-right but govern like the soft-left. They aren’t trying to fix our democracy; they are just managing its decline!

Worst of all, Luxon’s re-election strategy relies on a cynical calculation. He expects traditional voters to hold their noses and vote National purely out of fear that a left-wing coalition would be worse. He is gambling our future on the arrogant assumption that we have nowhere else to go.

The ultimate proof of this insincere strategy lies in the background of Luxon’s chosen frontman for Maori Development and Conservation, Tama Potaka. By fast-tracking Potaka through the 2022 Hamilton West by-election, Luxon brought in a man who spent his career expanding tribal commercial dominance and utilising Treaty legislation against government departments, and placed him in charge of state assets.

Luxon desperately needed high profile, corporate Maori talent to soften the party’s image. Potaka, a former member of the Maori Party, fitted the bill perfectly to bridge the gap between National and the tribal elite.

The smoking gun lies in Potaka’s own academic and corporate record. In a Victoria University law paper titled “A Treaty Agendum for Local Government,” he laid out the explicit blueprint for co-governance, writing – “Central government and local government need to consider sharing power with Māori, instead of hoping that Māori entitlements and demands will be satisfied with policies that effectively mainstream Māori into Pākehā society.”

While National campaigned fiercely on dismantling co-governance, Potaka previously laid out the blueprint for it, explicitly writing that – “…boards or committees which are responsible for water management, land use, planning and environmental management could have a 50:50 Māori and local government representation…”

Before entering Parliament, Tama Potaka spent years climbing the ladder of corporate iwi. He was General Manager at Tainui Group Holdings before serving as CEO of the Ngai Tai ki Tamaki Trust from 2020 to 2022. This background makes him the perfect corporate insider to quietly oversee further tribal funding and influence while Luxon distracts the public.

We see this Maori corporate blueprint alive and well in National’s flagship policies. Labour’s “Three Waters” provoked public fury by mandating top-down, 50/50 co-governance. National proudly scrapped it, but Luxon’s replacement, “Local Water Done Well,” is a classic political sleight of hand.

Instead of banning co-governance, National simply passed the buck, forcing local councils to form independent corporate entities to manage water debts.

Under this model, councils like Wellington have already partnered directly with local iwi to jointly govern brand-new regional water structures. By localising the process, National cunningly deletes Labour’s public mandates only to quietly allow the exact same tribal veto power, safely hidden behind a veil of council administration.

This institutional hypocrisy is not an accident; it is hardwired into the current administration. National’s history is a masterclass in political duplicity. While cynically farming centre right votes with promises of “one standard of citizenship,” an unbroken line of National Prime Ministers, from Bolger to Luxon, has actively built, funded, and legally entrenched the Maori corporate power base!

They got away with jeopardizing our heritage because everyday voters trusted them… blindly. And many still do.

For decades, New Zealanders simply couldn’t conceive that the centre right party they loyally voted for would deliberately sell out their democratic rights. This blind trust acted as a perfect smokescreen, allowing National to hand over massive control to tribal elites while their own voters were busy building their families, building their lives!

The Future. This is the difficult part. How do we right the ship?

Before we can act, we must confront four undeniable facts:

1. New Zealand cannot sustain the multi-billion-dollar, race-based spending of the last three decades.

2. Our democracy will not survive the continuous handover of power to unelected tribal authorities.

3. A radicalised Labour opposition waits in the wings, ready to accelerate co-governance.

4. A National Party that campaigns on equality but governs on appeasement can no longer be tolerated.

Change will not come easily. So many people are completely blind to the incremental entrenchment of tribal privilege, ignoring the alarming reality that our freedoms are balancing on a knife-edge. Too many are consumed by the daily grind of their own lives to take notice, shrugging their shoulders and telling themselves that worrying is just a waste of time.

Apathy rules, and governments know it!

If you want to return the party to its original roots of individual freedom and equal citizenship, you cannot just sit back and complain. You have to force their hand. For once, MMP can actually work in our favour through tactical vote splitting. But it’s risky.

If voters give their local electorate vote to National but give their crucial party vote to ACT or NZ First, it can trigger a parliamentary “overhang.” National wins local seats but drops to zero list MPs, artificially inflating their seat count while expanding the total size of Parliament. Concurrently, ACT and NZ First absorb those party votes, massively expanding their own list seats. This structural dynamic ensures the centre-right block becomes unassailable, but it completely strips National of absolute control, making the minor partners our influential watchdogs.

But voting every three years is no longer a sufficient shield against our democratic decline. We must turn our frustration into an organized political force through three direct actions:

First, we must starve the machine. Stop bankrolling National’s campaign chest. Money is the only measure corporate politicians respect, and they must earn our financial support by defending our principles first. Redirect your funding directly to the frontlines—to minor parties or independent local candidates who refuse to compromise on equal citizenship.

Next, get involved! Organize with like-minded friends and neighbours, join your local National electorate committee, and turn up in force to their AGMs. National’s course of appeasement is set by national executives, but they cannot survive without local grassroots backing. Use your collective internal voting power to challenge weak MPs and vote them out at the candidate selection level before they ever reach a ballot paper.

Finally, break the silence. Politicians only find their spine when they truly fear for their political survival. We must make the political cost of funding tribal elites vastly higher than the cost of standing up for true democracy. Publicly and relentlessly confront your MP’s at community forums and election meetings. Demand binding commitments to a colour blind democracy!

We must strip National of the comfort of our silent loyalty. It is time to make them realise that if they refuse to hold our democracy dear, we will actively pull the rug out from under their feet!

To those who disapproved of the first two parts of this series, I am not an outsider throwing stones. I am a lifelong, right-leaning voter who has watched the National Party walk away from its own values.

It was when I finally understood the absolute preposterousness and peril of John Key’s Marine and Coastal Area Act that I knew, once and for all, that National did not deserve my vote. Moving my support to ACT wasn’t an act of betrayal, it was an act of political necessity.

It was the only meaningful way to shatter the comfortable illusion that traditional voters have nowhere else to go, sending an undeniable message to the Wellington establishment: If you will not defend one person, one vote, we will find someone who will!

By taking a stand and splitting our votes, we aren’t just complaining from the sidelines, we are actively altering the balance of power. We are forcing a complacent National leadership to look over their shoulders at a rising, disaffected watchdog. If National wants our loyalty back, they must earn it on the boardroom floor and on the campaign trail. Until they remember that their true purpose is to protect the equal rights of every single New Zealander, not just manage corporate tribal deals; traditional voters will continue to walk away!

New Zealand is heading down a dangerous, accelerating path toward a fractured ethnocracy. It is a future where tribal discord prevails, where self-appointed elites scuffle over the government coffers and where your rights, wealth, and power are dispensed entirely according to your lineage!

New Zealand must wake up to this glaring reality.

We desperately need a government with the absolute courage to state that Maori are perfectly capable of standing on their own two feet without state mandated privileges.

We need a government that firmly believes Maori are not a separate, superior class deserving of continuous financial and political advantage, but equal citizens alongside every other ethnicity in this country.

The choice before us is clear, and time is running out.

Maori culture we can embrace; Maori rule we cannot!

Pee Kay writes he is from a generation where common sense, standards, integrity and honesty are fundamental attributes. This article was first published HERE

13 comments:

Janine said...

To be fair, some of us did point out Nationals leanings before the last election. I was reprimanded by National supporters and told that National did not believe the "Treaty was a partnership" when their own website stated clearly that they did, before the election. I was urged not to vote for a minor party as that would ensure a Labour victory.
However, anybody who didn't want co-governance voted for ACT or NZF( neither of which are perfect).
If a political party believes the Treaty is a partnership then they will pursue certain agenda.
Even now they are very slow to call out separatism. Luxon absolutely has to take responsibility for this as he is steering the ship.

Anonymous said...

I think everyone agrees the treaty needs to be adhered to.

I also think everyone wants equal rights for everyone. Luxon is destroying this country and losing voters. He is trying win more labour voters but he doesn't get it, they will never vote national.

Voters are not uneducated or uninformed, we want equality and democracy.

Barrie Davis said...

I don't agree the Treaty needs to be adhered to. It is a centuries old agreement put together before New Zealand was even created. Its authors could not possibly have anticipated our present situation.
The Treaty can act as a guide based on where we have come from, but we need to be realistic and do what is best for the nation now and for what we now understand of our future.
In truth, the Treaty is now primarily a device which is being cynically used by a faction of dissenters to manipulate the gullible into achieving their personal aims of power and wealth.

Doug Longmire said...

Truly, the Enemy Within is winning.
Apartheid is arriving here in New Zimbabwe.

Anonymous said...

I am saddened and sick at heart with what National has allowed to happened under their watch. I catch the train and hear all the announcements first made in Maori, my wife's new passport has the cover with Maori written first, small things but among many "in your face" reminders, every day, that National have let us all down.
Act should be polling much higher as so many times I am now hearing, "dyed in the wool", National voters saying that their vote is now going to Act.
So is mine.

Anonymous said...

Dear Barrie, I take your point, and actually agree with you. The treaty was signed a long time ago and yes maybe its time to move on and maybe write a constitution. I wonder how that idea would go down with the masses.

Anonymous said...

While Luxon, Goldsmith, Watts , Potaka are still running NZ under their personal opinions, they will never get my usual National vote again.
Thanks for enlightening us about Potaka and his previous background.
If Luxon put him in charge knowing all this, it clearly shows how devious Luxon really is - bet he would continue his treacherous actions of possible.

Majority said...

What an excellent article! And with an ACTUAL PLAN for taking action.

But there’s another important step: send someone you know a link to this page.

It need to be shared far and wide, because it certainly won’t be seen in the lame-stream media.

Anonymous said...

Forty to fifty years of careful, deceitful undermining of NZ’s once solid democratic and civilised foundation has led to a very unstable foundation, now noticeably trembling beneath our feet. All, I repeat, all, of our political leaders have failed the integrity test, such that not one MP can be expected to speak the truth, as he or she sees it. Can we recover the honest world of the recent past? Probably not. Unless we do, this country will become unliveable. I grieve for my grandchildren if they remain in these South Sea islands.

Anonymous said...

Sometime around the early 1980s a consensus was arrived at among the New Zealand ruling rich that the way to contain the burgeoning struggle for Māori national rights was to split it along class lines by fostering the rise of a Māori bourgeoisie with whom they could do business.
The majority of the ruling class are still sticking to this strategy, hence the approach of the current National Government.
The bleating of people like Pee Kay, first heard from Don Brash and the Hobsons Choice crowd, merely registers the fact a minority faction among our wealthy classes think the process has gone too far, and that the “tribal elites” are claiming more than their fair share.

Fiona said...

I totally agree. While delighted that Paul Henry is attracting some attention for ACT & an inspirational NZ, I’m stunned that he thinks John Key was the best PM we’ve ever had. Key’s MACA (coastal) corruption & sneaky UNDRIP-He Puapua separatism must just be further detail that Henry’s overlooked in his adoration of Key’s success.

Anonymous said...

I wonder if this election we will see the demise of the mindless, duplicitous hold LAB/NATS have had on NZ gummint. Time they left for their wilderness years.... backsides KICKED .......H A R D ..

Anonymous said...

@Fiona, while I think Paul Henry is good for ACT, I also think he needs some enlightenment on the Treaty, and the different Acts that have been endowed on Maori/Tribes. If he doesn't get up to speed the opposition will tie him up in knots in a debate - won't be a good look.

Post a Comment

Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.