Pages

Showing posts with label privacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label privacy. Show all posts

Thursday, January 15, 2026

Dylan A Mordaunt: NZ’s health data hack needs a proper diagnosis – and a transparent treatment plan


Two cyber hacks have highlighted the vulnerability of New Zealand’s digital health systems – and the vast volumes of patient data we rely on them to protect.

Following the hacking of Manage My Health – compromising the records of about 127,000 patients – and an earlier breach at Canopy Health, a concerned public is asking how this happened and who is to blame.

The most urgent question, however, is whether it can happen again.

Friday, December 19, 2025

Gary Moller: Digital ID and Its Impact on Free Speech and the Future of Our Children


Today, we are wrapping our children up in digital cotton wool! What are the implications?

Freedom and privacy are cornerstones of any democratic society. In New Zealand, recent discussions led by the Taxpayers Union and the Free Speech Union have brought urgent attention to two critical issues: the rise of digital ID systems and the increasing control over children's exposure to the digital world. Both developments raise serious questions about the direction our country is heading and the kind of future we want for our children.

Sunday, November 10, 2024

Nicholas Dynon: Facial recognition technology.....


In your face: our acceptance of facial recognition technology depends on who is doing it – and where

Facial recognition technology is becoming more widely used, but this has not been matched by wider acceptance from the public.

Controversies continue to hit the media, with both public and private sector organisations frequently outed for flawed deployments of the technology.

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Ron Smith: Security and trust

I have regularly argued (or sometimes simply assumed) that it is reasonable to accept some degree of state intrusion into the private dealings of its citizens, in the interests of national or individual security (see, for instance, ‘Spying and the public interest’, November 2011).  Of course, I also accept that it is permissible to spy on individuals who may not be citizens but who may represent a threat to those who are.  Indeed, quite recently, I have criticised US security authorities for failing to be sufficiently proactive in the matter of the Boston bombers (‘Loosers’, April, this year).