“A Sovereign Independent Court of Justice – ‘Kooti Wakanga’ has been established under Tikanga and He Wakaputanga Law.” This, claimed to be “the first sovereign independent Grand Jury Court of justice, Te Wakaminenga Kooti Wakanga nui of Nu Tireni – New Zealand, ... will deal with civil and criminal claims for all Sovereign Nationals of Nu Tireni NZ who register with the Wakaminenga Maori Government under the jurisdiction of Tikanga and He Wakaputanga.”
The first case, “brought
by the members of the Wakaminenga Maori Government … deals with alleged
breaches of the sovereign law of He Wakaputanga and crimes of genocide
and against humanity.”
There has been no official reaction, but rather a failure to
stand up to such treasonable actions.
This is nothing new.
This alternative government has existed for some years, as described in a
chapter of a 2022 book.[2] The conclusions were obvious.
“An alternative government, destroying the unity of the
nation, has been set up, and is unchallenged.
Indeed, a fragmentation, a multiplicity of further alternative
governments, is suggested.
Unfortunately, these actions sit comfortably with the government policy
of racial separation and co-governance. Such
treasonable acts undermine the integrity, legitimacy and strength of the
democratically elected parliament.
The resultant confusion and disunity will reduce the real, and only,
government’s ability to get things done for the good of all New Zealanders.”
These actions follow the directions set down by the 2019 He
Puapua report to government (which has never been reputed), moving towards
their “Vision 2040”, which proposes three separate governments: the Crown parliament,
sort-of-democratic, for us all (including Maori); the Maori parliament, separate
by race, tribal and non-democratic; and the joint parliament to settle disputes
between those two bodies – with a Maori veto: “In the common (kawangatanga)
sphere: ‘The Crown resiles some of its power in agreed areas to make space
for rangatiratanga, for defined Maori interests. The public service is bicultural and
understands the ways in which it must support rangatiratanga.’”[3]
New Zealand is to move away from modern civilisation to a
stone-age tribal form of government, from a unified nation where we are one
people, to the balkanisation of fragmented sovereignty.
Many steps have been
taken in that direction, as support for the breakup of the nation has come from
many groups and organisations, including government and the justice system. Here are a few examples.
The Marine and
Coastal Area Act 2011, sets down a radically different new test for customary
marine title, taking account of “the intrinsic, inherited rights of iwi,
hapu, and whanau, derived in accordance with tikanga”.[4]
The courts have
played their part, introducing an undefined tikanga into law, with the
meaning to be determined by the hapu concerned.[5]
“The Waitangi
Tribunal has advanced ideas of dual sovereignty, so that hapu and iwi
can exert their own separate sovereignty, and has falsely ruled that many Maori
never accepted the sovereignty of the government.”[6]
And, of course,
there is the revision (rewriting, even falsification) of history and the
reversal of the Treaty of Waitangi, from the call that “Now we are one people”
to the very opposite, a divided ‘partnership’, and from a united sovereignty to
divided sovereignty held by the many hapu.
Such thinking has
led to calls for constitutional change, away from the principles of
equality and democracy. One action in
this direction was a 2022 meeting at The University of Auckland’s Business
School – a “Constitutional
Conference Korero”, a hui “to provide the technical and
legal support for constitutional transformation in Aotearoa New
Zealand”, a “national wananga to bring together experts from around the
world and within Aotearoa to present arguments and options for constitutional
transformation, to realise Maori rights.”[7]
Such diverse efforts have for many years been working to
overthrow our system of government and our laws. Maori Party spokespeople want it all:
race-based constitution and governments, separated control over all the land,
rivers and seas, and more. At what
stage is this activity treason, rebellion, a coup? Perhaps that point was passed some time ago.
Those leading the
takeover have the power to prevent awareness of their activities and to block
any distribution of information. Talk of
equality is banned under the government requirement to observe the directions
of a false Treaty, the official version of the tiriti. Efforts to present a critical analysis are
closed down, by the capture of media and much of local government, and
by the aggressive mobs who disrupt meetings, refusing the freedom of speech to
those who will not blindly follow the current racist propaganda.
Co-Governance is a major step in this coup, a policy that
must be opened to intense scrutiny – but
only if that freedom of thought and expression is allowed. However, recent experiences of the Stop
Co-Governance movement to hold meetings (led by speaker Julian Batchelor) provide a graphic representation of the
censorship process, and of the breakdown of civil society forced by and
supported by the current government.
Public venues have been refused, or withdrawn at the last moment by councils. Mobs have gathered to intimidate those
attending and to shout down speakers.
All too often (with a few welcome exceptions) the Police have stood by
and allowed the demonstrators to force meetings to close. The response forced on the organisers is hold
private meetings, complete with barriers against aggressive mobs and well-built
volunteers as guards. This is not the
New Zealand I want.
It is impossible in the New Zealand of today to hold a
public discussion of major government policy.
Many basic freedoms must be fought for.
[2] Robinson J L 2022, Regaining a nation; equality and democracy, Tross Publishing, pages 186-195
[3] Robinson J L 2021, He Puapua; Blueprint for breaking up New Zealand, Tross Publishing, page 75
[4] op
cit, page 83
[5] op
cit, pages 97-107
[6]
Robinson J L 2023, Equality or tribal rule, https://www.nzcpr.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/John-Robinson.pdf,
page 83
[7] op
cit, page 19
Dr John Robinson is a research scientist, who has investigated a variety of topics,
including the social statistics of Maori. His recognition of fundamental
flaws in the interpretation of nineteenth century Maori demographics led him to
consider the history of those times in
several books.
3 comments:
I see a bad moon rising. I see trouble on the way.
You re absolutely correct, John. It is truly insidious this treasonous creep where freedom of speech has been closed down by a few vociferous radicals, the wokerati, and those scared of being labeled a racist when it's nothing of the sort.
In some ways, it's a shame that capital punishment was done away with, more especially for what was once considered the most heinous of all crimes - treason. It is nothing short of treason what's being suggested and, if it does continue to proceed, it will be our ruination with violent unrest sure to ultimately follow.
I have faith that the majority will win out but, when it does, it must stamp out this nonsense once and for all, or it will continue to fester like the societal cancer it is. Regrettably, I don't see Mr Luxon having that resolve.
And most of these " maori" are pakeha. Our country is an absolute joke. It is more and more like north korea where nothing is real. If this was a true situation about neglect of one race, then the members of that race woild be defined. But no. You can look like a scandinavian and self-identify as a maori if you wish.
Post a Comment