Goodwin writes:
More than 75% of Brussels is now foreign-origin, with over 60% coming from outside Europe. Nearly 60% of Amsterdam’s population is of migrant background while only one in three children have two Dutch parents.
In Frankfurt and Rotterdam, native populations are already minorities. In Stockholm and Vienna, close to half the population is now foreign-born or of foreign origin.
In Hamburg and Stuttgart, it is about 40%. In Berlin, official statistics just revealed that more than half of all children and teenagers have a migrant background.
In London, entire boroughs are places where more than eight in ten children have at least one foreign-born parent — often from South Asia, the Middle East, or Africa.
These are not marginal changes.
They are civilisational shifts.
They are quite staggering statistics.
And according to Pew Research, if current trends continue, by the year 2050, only 24 years from now, around 31% of Sweden, 20% of Germany and Austria, 18% of France and Belgium, and 17% of the UK will be Muslim — not through conquest, but through choices made by elites who never asked the public for consent.
Some immigration is inevitable. Some is beneficial.
But what Europe has experienced is neither controlled nor moderate. It is change at a scale and speed that no society in history has ever absorbed without tension.
The key words here are controlled, moderate and with consent.
Again NZ does this well. We have a points system where your ability to get a skilled migrant visa is dependent on your qualifications, income, occupation, work experience.
But the reason there is such a populist uprising in Europe is because the pace and extent of uncontrolled immigration has caused huge problems. Cities in Sweden like Malmo have become ganglands with teenage assassins. The gun murder rate is 30 times higher than in London. 45% of guns crimes are done by teenagers.
David Farrar runs Curia Market Research, a specialist opinion polling and research agency, and the popular Kiwiblog where this article was sourced. He previously worked in the Parliament for eight years, serving two National Party Prime Ministers and three Opposition Leaders
2 comments:
When it comes to excessive immigration, NZ isn't one to talk. You mention the Netherlands, Germany and Sweden, of whom 16%, 19% and 21% respectively of their populations are immigrants. In NZ the figure is 29%, and in Auckland it is around 40%. People are complaining about housing intensification and the destruction of the Kiwi way of life, but what do they expect?
European problems are rooted in the past - starting in the 50s with what was then West Germany formalising the import of Gastarbeiter to help rebuild the country. That program was shut in the 70s but the idea of importing cheap labour to do undesirable work spread across the Western world. There were no attempts to integrate these people because they were supposed to be temporary. Only many of them weren’t. And so it continued - propped by convenience and immigration mismanagement. For countries that were ethnically quite homogeneous this is beyond significant. New Zealand is a different case - we are a country of immigrants, and we are small. Can’t afford to shut down immigration, but shouldn’t let in just everyone who wants to live here. Like they say - if it is cheap, it will cost you.
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.