Pages

Friday, May 1, 2026

Kerre Woodham: The country we want costs more than we're willing to pay


The topic of tax has been in the news recently and it will stay in the news. It’s set to become an election issue with one of the few policies that Labour's actually committed to being a Capital Gains Tax – possibly more taxation/revenue measures. Watch the politicians dance on the head of a pin in the lead up to the election. The Fitch report, which looks at New Zealand's ability to pay its bills, said that a Labour Party coalition with the Greens and Te Pāti Māori would emphasise revenue measures as a means of making ends meet. The authors of the report said the National Party-led coalition would focus on expenditure constraint. There's been all sorts of argy bargy and we can go into that a little bit later, but already, even when we start talking about tax and about Labour introducing a Capital Gains Tax and more tax, it's said like it's a bad thing. Like it's a dreadful thing to contemplate more tax.

And yet, how else are we going to pay for the sort of country that we want, that we used to have, that we hear mythical stories about around the fireside from our forebears? Liam Dann has a column in the New Zealand Herald, Inside Economics, and in the column this morning, a correspondent writes that on a tax per capita basis, New Zealand is running materially behind Australia – roughly $13.6 billion annually. Now obviously, Aussies earn more, so their governments are going to take more tax. If you earn more, there's more to take on a percentage basis. But the correspondent writes that even closing a fraction of the tax would meaningfully shift the balance of our books into a positive light and it would change the way we talk about infrastructure and services. Even a tiny bit of that $13.6 billion would make a huge difference.

The correspondent is a blogger and, in his blog, he also writes that one of the reasons why Aussies are prepared to pay more in tax is that they have accepted a basic truth: the country they want costs more to run. And I don't know that we are willing to accept that basic truth. We are still living like some crusty old goat on our former glory. Like the Bruce Springsteen song of 'Glory Days'. We used to be somebody. We used to have a great country. We used to have a country where Jack was as good as his master, where there were no huge extremes between wealth and poverty, where if you worked reasonably hard, if you lived a good life, if you obeyed the rules, you had a great life. You could be assured of a future; your children could be assured of a future. And we're still living on the glory days.

Now obviously not everything that has happened in New Zealand is as a result of what New Zealand has done. We're a global economy now and the winds of change and fortune affect us without our politicians having to do anything at all. But over the years, successive governments have failed to invest in basic infrastructure, and the chickens are coming home to roost – Wellington's Moa Point is a metaphor for the entire country. Our politicians are to blame for a lack of political courage and a lack of political foresight, and we as voters are to blame because as soon as anybody mentions tax, we throw up our aprons and run for the hills. Never! I work hard for my money! I've paid my way, I pay more than enough, have a look at those bludging people on the dole, sort them out first! You can make all the excuses in the world, but are we willing to accept a basic truth that the country we want costs more to run than we're willing to pay.

Kerre McIvor, is a journalist, radio presenter, author and columnist. Currently hosts the Kerre Woodham mornings show on Newstalk ZB - where this article was sourced.

5 comments:

anonymous said...

No - it is not terrible to pay more tax if warranted. What is unsustainable is to have so many people who could work and pay tax on benefits. These two scenarios should be mentioned together.

Anonymous said...

Stop the endless treaty grifting at state and local level- all of it.
The whale music, the mbie waists, the Māori consultants being consulted about feelings, the 180m mafia shakedowns / koha for electricity…or was it gold….or both.
Then we could afford all sorts of things for everyone- including maori.

Anonymous said...

This question is upside down. What we should ask is: is this the best we can achieve with the tax that is collect? What if we reduce the layers of bureaucracy and stop funding ideologies? Replace blanket benefit system with targeted support that prop people to look after themselves? Increasing taxes has unintended consequences- people in the high tax bracket tend to leave when they feel fleeced - and with them the tax they pay. Then the burden falls on the middle class

Anonymous said...

I wouldn’t mind paying more tax if I had any evidence that the government and councils aren’t wasting money hand over fist every day

How about a cap on the number of PR or media staff each of these organisations can have??? How many millions would that alone save?

We’re drowning in bureaucrats & don’t have a lot to show for it

Anonymous said...

Hear, hear to the four commentators above. We pay the right amount of tax now, The Govt needs to cut its cloth to suit. There are plenty of good suggestions being made on how to do it, but our touchy feely PM doesn't want to know

Post a Comment

Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.