Maori favouritism (racial division) has reached the point of being a form of apartheid in New Zealand. The fact being, there are hundreds of preferential “provisions” along with 96 Acts of Parliament exclusively benefitting those of Maori heritage.
This racist situation has eventuated through what could be described as deceitful manipulation of pertinent information. Which only an insignificant percentage of us are fully aware of. So, we are vainly trying to get the truth out there through Forums, Blog Sites and emails to each other.
But, let’s face it, we are preaching to the converted. We’re all running around in circles like headless chooks … within an isolated vacuum. And not really making any progress. Whilst, the Maori Activists have got their act together so well that they’re winning their crusade virtually unopposed.
This is of serious national significance … with our secure futures being at stake. So, the point I’m coming to is that we need to change tack, i.e. come up with a better strategy. But to do so, we must face the fact that the majority of people in positions of authority have been thoroughly indoctrinated into believing that Maori do not receive any “special” advantages or favouritism other than what they deserve.
And if you try to convince them of things such as the Treaty isn’t a Partnership, they’re not going to be swayed, because they’ll argue that despite the concept of partnership not being explicitly written in the 1840 document, it has nevertheless been accepted as legitimate in Law, due to the fact that in 1975 it became part of the “Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi”.
The truth is, the so-called “Principles” are fictitious, i.e. were dreamed up. And thus, are fraudulent. And the really scandalous bit is that they are mainly left open as illusionary … meaning, “Principles” can be whatever Maori want them to be. Open slather.
A further fraudulent twisting of the Treaty involves Article 2. where Maori are guaranteed ownership of their lands … and there is the additional word “PROPERTY” which refers to personal belongings and precious treasures (taonga) which has now been deviously misconstrued as meaning underground minerals, plant life, wildlife, WATER, and even the sky (air waves).
The deceit also extends to the claim that the treaty included “Forests & Fisheries” as rights for Maori. This is despite the fact that the genuine “Mother” Draft of the Treaty used for translating into te reo (which was misplaced until found in 1989) makes no mention of those words. Which of course, explains why they’re absent on the Treaty written in Maori. Which is meant to be the “official” Treaty.
Other than the word “Fisheries” wrongly benefitting Maori in the way of exclusive harvesting ‘rights’, and being gifted huge tonnages of quota, plus shares in major fishing Companies … the word “forests” is now being taken by some as meaning Maori should be handed the ownership of our entire DoC Estate!!!
Aside from all that, it is accepted by many (who should know better) that Maori are Indigenous to New Zealand. That false (fake) assertion is due to the National Prime Minister, John Key, underhandedly arranging to have us sign up to the “UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples” solely for political advantage. Despite Labour having refused to do so!
However, it should be noted that signing was purely tokenism, and is non-binding.
Another ridiculous claim is that the chiefs did not cede sovereignty to the British Crown. See below just one example of proof that the Treaty was about the British governing all New Zealanders.
Te Papa Museum clarifies what the treaty meant, quote: “Kei a Kuini Wikitria te mana kawanatanga, kei nga rangitira te mana rangatiratanga”.
Meaning: “Queen Victoria holds authority over the country and the chiefs hold right of possession”.
Thus, the modern take on the Treaty is very obviously fake … so, we should be demanding a proper inquiry. A Court of inquiry so to speak. But remember, even if you took it as a Case to the High Court, you’d lose because they’d say the matter can’t be overruled … unless changed by way of Parliamentary order.
But, government are not going to make changes that will cause civil unrest with Maori protesting and threatening. Keeping in mind, it’s not just Maori who would be upset … there’s also the myriad of idealistic folk of a liberal persuasion who would side with them.
Are you starting to see what we’re up against? Making a fuss will not change anything. We’ve been thinking for too long that the only way of handling it is by educating people. But we’re running out of time … and anyway, the activists have well and truly beaten us at that game … starting with our school children. So, it looks like we’re defeated.
That is, unless we could organise something such as a Citizens Initiated Referendum. But that wouldn’t work either, because as already pointed out, those in the position of ruling on it are either woke, and/or indoctrinated beyond reason, or have a vested interest … so nothing would change.
What we need to do is to change tack completely … and concentrate our efforts on forcing an “inquiry” into why this country is not honouring Article 3. of the Treaty which reads: “A ratoa nga tikanga katoa rite tahi”.
Meaning: “All New Zealanders are equal under the law, with the same “rights”.
Because even though Hugh Kawharu twisted the meaning of Maori words in Articles 1. and 2. in order to claim that Maori were given the right to self-determination … that child-like manipulation is clearly shown up as a ridiculous contradiction of Article 3. (which he wasn’t able to misinterpret) because it clearly states that Maori will be given the same “rights” as British Subjects.
I mentioned that when Hugh Kawharu back-translated Ti Tiriti he was unable to twist the meaning of “equality” in Article 3. –and yet, the latest generation of Activists have become so adept at their game, they’ve unbelievably tried to misinterpret it as meaning “equity”. As in ‘equitable outcome’ for Maori. And by that, they mean doing as well in life as the rest of us, without too much effort on their part.
Anyway, the only feasible suggestion I can come up with is to concentrate our efforts on convincing people to Party vote for ACT so that they have more sway in negotiations with National. Even by insisting the Treaty Principles Bill be accepted as a bottom-line.
But once again, if they got it through, it wouldn’t come to anything because most Politicians, Lawyers and Judges believe what they believe.
Therefore, the best way around this whole matter is for ACT to organise a group of respected, high-profile people, including the likes of former Judge and Law Lecturer, Anthony Willy and Barrister, Gary Judd KC, as well as Professor Elizabeth Rata, to be given the right to challenge the status quo through a debate, by way of an official inquiry into whether matters to do with Maori (including Acts of Parliament) are actually legitimate, or not. For example, was the 1975 Treaty Principles Bill established on flawed information … and thus, a travesty of justice (illegal).
The three experts mentioned above have been working on this matter as lone voices. And not really getting anywhere. But if combined as one, along with other suitably qualified people, promoted and backed by David Seymour, they could have an impact.
If this whole matter could be thrashed out to the point where the truth prevailed, then everyone would see the reasoning behind the outcome. Because you’ve got to remember that most people, especially Maori, believe the fictitious propaganda that has been fed to them. Therefore, you can’t blame them for fighting against any change that would, in their minds, mean being robbed of their lawful rights. That would be the final straw … because they already believe their land was stolen from them. Despite recorded evidence showing that early Maori sold 92% of this country.
So, there you have it. I’m saying it’s time to stop telling each other what we already know. We should be making a direct challenge … but not in the form of a hikoi from hell. We need to do it in a civilised and professional manner. Urgently.
This is of serious national significance … with our secure futures being at stake. So, the point I’m coming to is that we need to change tack, i.e. come up with a better strategy. But to do so, we must face the fact that the majority of people in positions of authority have been thoroughly indoctrinated into believing that Maori do not receive any “special” advantages or favouritism other than what they deserve.
And if you try to convince them of things such as the Treaty isn’t a Partnership, they’re not going to be swayed, because they’ll argue that despite the concept of partnership not being explicitly written in the 1840 document, it has nevertheless been accepted as legitimate in Law, due to the fact that in 1975 it became part of the “Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi”.
The truth is, the so-called “Principles” are fictitious, i.e. were dreamed up. And thus, are fraudulent. And the really scandalous bit is that they are mainly left open as illusionary … meaning, “Principles” can be whatever Maori want them to be. Open slather.
A further fraudulent twisting of the Treaty involves Article 2. where Maori are guaranteed ownership of their lands … and there is the additional word “PROPERTY” which refers to personal belongings and precious treasures (taonga) which has now been deviously misconstrued as meaning underground minerals, plant life, wildlife, WATER, and even the sky (air waves).
The deceit also extends to the claim that the treaty included “Forests & Fisheries” as rights for Maori. This is despite the fact that the genuine “Mother” Draft of the Treaty used for translating into te reo (which was misplaced until found in 1989) makes no mention of those words. Which of course, explains why they’re absent on the Treaty written in Maori. Which is meant to be the “official” Treaty.
Other than the word “Fisheries” wrongly benefitting Maori in the way of exclusive harvesting ‘rights’, and being gifted huge tonnages of quota, plus shares in major fishing Companies … the word “forests” is now being taken by some as meaning Maori should be handed the ownership of our entire DoC Estate!!!
Aside from all that, it is accepted by many (who should know better) that Maori are Indigenous to New Zealand. That false (fake) assertion is due to the National Prime Minister, John Key, underhandedly arranging to have us sign up to the “UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples” solely for political advantage. Despite Labour having refused to do so!
However, it should be noted that signing was purely tokenism, and is non-binding.
Another ridiculous claim is that the chiefs did not cede sovereignty to the British Crown. See below just one example of proof that the Treaty was about the British governing all New Zealanders.
Te Papa Museum clarifies what the treaty meant, quote: “Kei a Kuini Wikitria te mana kawanatanga, kei nga rangitira te mana rangatiratanga”.
Meaning: “Queen Victoria holds authority over the country and the chiefs hold right of possession”.
Thus, the modern take on the Treaty is very obviously fake … so, we should be demanding a proper inquiry. A Court of inquiry so to speak. But remember, even if you took it as a Case to the High Court, you’d lose because they’d say the matter can’t be overruled … unless changed by way of Parliamentary order.
But, government are not going to make changes that will cause civil unrest with Maori protesting and threatening. Keeping in mind, it’s not just Maori who would be upset … there’s also the myriad of idealistic folk of a liberal persuasion who would side with them.
Are you starting to see what we’re up against? Making a fuss will not change anything. We’ve been thinking for too long that the only way of handling it is by educating people. But we’re running out of time … and anyway, the activists have well and truly beaten us at that game … starting with our school children. So, it looks like we’re defeated.
That is, unless we could organise something such as a Citizens Initiated Referendum. But that wouldn’t work either, because as already pointed out, those in the position of ruling on it are either woke, and/or indoctrinated beyond reason, or have a vested interest … so nothing would change.
What we need to do is to change tack completely … and concentrate our efforts on forcing an “inquiry” into why this country is not honouring Article 3. of the Treaty which reads: “A ratoa nga tikanga katoa rite tahi”.
Meaning: “All New Zealanders are equal under the law, with the same “rights”.
Because even though Hugh Kawharu twisted the meaning of Maori words in Articles 1. and 2. in order to claim that Maori were given the right to self-determination … that child-like manipulation is clearly shown up as a ridiculous contradiction of Article 3. (which he wasn’t able to misinterpret) because it clearly states that Maori will be given the same “rights” as British Subjects.
I mentioned that when Hugh Kawharu back-translated Ti Tiriti he was unable to twist the meaning of “equality” in Article 3. –and yet, the latest generation of Activists have become so adept at their game, they’ve unbelievably tried to misinterpret it as meaning “equity”. As in ‘equitable outcome’ for Maori. And by that, they mean doing as well in life as the rest of us, without too much effort on their part.
Anyway, the only feasible suggestion I can come up with is to concentrate our efforts on convincing people to Party vote for ACT so that they have more sway in negotiations with National. Even by insisting the Treaty Principles Bill be accepted as a bottom-line.
But once again, if they got it through, it wouldn’t come to anything because most Politicians, Lawyers and Judges believe what they believe.
Therefore, the best way around this whole matter is for ACT to organise a group of respected, high-profile people, including the likes of former Judge and Law Lecturer, Anthony Willy and Barrister, Gary Judd KC, as well as Professor Elizabeth Rata, to be given the right to challenge the status quo through a debate, by way of an official inquiry into whether matters to do with Maori (including Acts of Parliament) are actually legitimate, or not. For example, was the 1975 Treaty Principles Bill established on flawed information … and thus, a travesty of justice (illegal).
The three experts mentioned above have been working on this matter as lone voices. And not really getting anywhere. But if combined as one, along with other suitably qualified people, promoted and backed by David Seymour, they could have an impact.
If this whole matter could be thrashed out to the point where the truth prevailed, then everyone would see the reasoning behind the outcome. Because you’ve got to remember that most people, especially Maori, believe the fictitious propaganda that has been fed to them. Therefore, you can’t blame them for fighting against any change that would, in their minds, mean being robbed of their lawful rights. That would be the final straw … because they already believe their land was stolen from them. Despite recorded evidence showing that early Maori sold 92% of this country.
So, there you have it. I’m saying it’s time to stop telling each other what we already know. We should be making a direct challenge … but not in the form of a hikoi from hell. We need to do it in a civilised and professional manner. Urgently.
3 comments:
Ok, I am convinced, I also believe ACT is the only party that can be trusted to take serious action on this issue. Some very real and well documented history is being ignored in this largely "invented" cultural history that Maori are claiming gives them special rights in our country. The country that is the result of 200 years of "our ancestors" endeavours.
I agree we are mainly preaching to the converted. It does seem strange that people would vote for parties solely on "race" or "ethnicity". Those are the people who would once have been considered "persona non grata". Here we are in 2026 and this is entirely acceptable.
The big picture is that people(woke whites) are prepared to throw away their children and grandchildren's rightful heritage to appear to be pro-Maori. It doesn't mean others who disagree are "anti-Maori." Not at all. There are many avenues to address social needs in our society without forfeiting our sovereignty. Also, we might want to enjoy our DOC land in the future.
Let me be frank. Govt is not honest. It wasn’t in 1975 and isn’t now. The path of appeasement and social engineering is the path of the politician. The NZ people didn’t do this, our govts did. Act is just as guilty as any other Party. Act signed off on any number of dubious settlements or elements therein. UDRIP was under Act’s watch as was the foreshore and seabed disaster. Has Act forced the correction of these matters, no they have not. The Principles bill so many champion solves nothing and has race embedded in the proposed Act. There are no principles and should be no Race in our NZ governance! Those are the facts. The treaty was never intended for statute. It was a formality to make way for the founding of NZ.
NZ govt sovereignty? Look what govts have done with that authority and is why we find ourselves in the state NZ is today. If the NZ people had held sovereign authority over their govts, much might have been avoided. Labour and National have been as bad as each other in their overall governance of NZ. They themselves have both actively eroded that very sovereignty through the years, internationally, and here at home emboldening the activist. Govt actively continues to use your taxes to fund corrupt organisations, W tribunitial just the obvious one and there are a great many others.
The names mentioned re asking for an enquiry. While one may find merit in their good standing, an inquiry will solve nothing. We also are faced with a failed 4th estate, heavily indoctrinated education apparatus and infiltrations of all our institutions… No, an enquiry will solve nothing.
Unless good people of all walks of life, come together, collectively take a stand in their personal and professional lives and also take to the streets of the country consistently, why should anything change otherwise. Voting clearly solves nothing. Local and central govts have failed the NZ people irrespective of ethnicity. Govt will not save the NZ people, only the NZ people can save themselves by standing up to the corruption of their governance and society. Why do good people not take to the streets and bring things to a head? Clearly Iwi want the capture of society a great deal more than the NZ people want to save themselves.
A substantial swing to Act and NZF would be of help, however will not shift National unless people take to the streets to back up Act and NZF re the actions you want them to take. National will not be moved by the meekness of the NZ people.
The problem is not with the PM. It is deeply embedded within national itself. Changing leader does not change the direction of National in these matters, nor voting them into office change Nationals core nature on these matters. Labour stole a march on National, but National have been moving in the same direction as Labour nevertheless.
Govts do not take heed of citizens referenda as history so states. The NZ people have no meaningful authority over sitting govts which is by deliberate design. Elections do not turn the tide as we have seen under National. The voter is little more than a distraction/inconvenience.
If you want to turn the tide, get organised, take to the streets. Be seen, be heard in dignity outside the echo chamber. Force the issue to a head, into the light, and bring about the corrective action yourselves, citizens of NZ. Meaningful, visible, respectful public action done with dignity. Give the names you mentioned the backup, including stuffing the in boxes of MPs year in year out with personal perspectives backed by truths, in turn facts and understanding as was known by those that lived the 1840s etc.
Push back from the vested is unavoidable given the privileged position afforded. Privilege only enjoyed because the NZ people have failed in their duty to take a stand against the corruption of NZ governance and the corruption of society. Restore the founding values the nation was build on. Kind regards
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.