Showing posts with label Medical Council. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Medical Council. Show all posts
Friday, July 10, 2026
Robin Grieve: The Medical Council's Shocker of a Consultation Document
Labels: Maori health, Medical Council, Robin GrieveMonday, July 6, 2026
John McLean: Infectious Medical Council Maori Madness
Labels: Dr Rachelle Love, John McLean, Māori race preferencing, Medical Council, Sarah Dalton, Simeon Brown, Simon WattsA chance insight into the Ministry of Health’s collective mind
Talking to embedded individuals can provide intriguing insights into elite sentiments on controversial matters.
I recently chewed the fat with one of our neighbors, an English-born doctor idling at the Ministry of Health. When I asked him what the general mood is at that Ministry, his face clouded with anger. He explained that Ministry staff are all furious and terribly distracted over the Minister of Health, baby faced assassin Simeon Brown, firing the chair and deputy-chair of the Medical Council.
Thursday, June 18, 2026
Bob Edlin: Simeon Brown applies his scalpel to the Medical Council.....
Labels: Bob Edlin, Health New Zealand, Ideological agenda, Medical Council, Simeon Brown, Treaty of WaitangiSimeon Brown applies his scalpel to the Medical Council – but Treaty ideology has spread through the health system
The Post reports:
Health Minister Simeon Brown has removed the leadership of New Zealand’s medical regulator, accusing the Medical Council of pursuing an “ideological agenda” and becoming distracted from its core responsibilities.
Friday, April 3, 2026
David Farrar: Good insights on the Medical Council
Labels: David Farrar, Grant Duncan, Medical Council, Statement on Cultural Competence and Cultural SafetyGrant Duncan writes:
Its draft “Statement on Cultural Competence and Cultural Safety” begins with the obvious – “Aotearoa New Zealand has a culturally diverse population” – but leaps ahead to assert: “Some dimensions of identity result in power and privilege whereas others result in underprivilege, which can lead to discrimination or marginalisation”. No scientific grounds are given for that statement, and anyway it’s simply ungrammatical: it uses an abstract noun – identity – as if it were a thing with “dimensions” that can “result in power”. Unfortunately, such poor writing gets a pass in some university courses.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


