Showing posts with label Referenda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Referenda. Show all posts
Friday, August 6, 2021
Karl du Fresne: A referendum? You mean, like, allowing people to have their say? We can't have that
Labels: Aotearoa, Karl du Fresne, ReferendaIt’s fascinating to observe the force with which the government and its protectors in the media have jumped on the National Party’s suggestion that official use of the name “Aotearoa” should be the subject of a referendum.
If this is the most pressing issue Judith Collins can come up with, they scoff, then she’s gone off the road (Ben Thomas’s phrase on Stuff). In any case, they remind us, “Aotearoa” has been around for years. It’s on our passports and banknotes. And guess who was in power when it was put there, as Newshub reminded us last night: why, the National Party! Game, set and match, then. Hell, hasn’t even Judith Collins been heard using the name once or twice?
Friday, July 31, 2020
NZCPR Weekly: Two Referenda
Labels: Dangers of cannabis, Election 2020, NZCPR Weekly Newsletter, ReferendaDear NZCPR Reader,
This week, we look ahead to September’s election and examine the upcoming referenda, our NZCPR Guest Commentator Dr James Farmer QC outlines his concerns about the proposed liberalisation of cannabis laws, and our poll asks whether you believe there will be majority support at the referendum for the legalisation of recreational cannabis.*To read the newsletter click HERE.
*To register for the NZCPR Weekly mailing list, click HERE.
Thursday, January 31, 2019
NZCPR Weekly: Referenda Chaos
Labels: Brexit, NZCPR Weekly Newsletter, ReferendaDear NZCPR Reader,
This week we examine the challenges of Brexit and what it means for New Zealand, our NZCPR Guest Commentator Professor Roger Bowden takes a more critical look at the use of referenda, and our poll asks for your opinion on Brexit – do you think it will be good or bad for the UK.*To read the newsletter click HERE.
*To register for the NZCPR Weekly mailing list, click HERE.
Sunday, November 16, 2014
Steve Baron: A $25.7m blunder waiting to happen
Labels: Flag, FPP, Referenda, Steve Baron, STV
I suspect the government is about to make a huge blunder.
They are investing $25.7 million in a flag referendum but they have made a
crucial mistake in selecting the voting system to decide the referendum. As my
mother always told me, if a job is worth doing, it is worth doing
properly—especially when spending this amount of money on a significant issue.
A briefing paper issued by the Office of the Deputy Prime
Minister (Bill English) has recommended the use of the First-Past-The-Post
(FPP) voting system in the first referendum. This referendum will choose from a
potential list of three or four flags that will go up against the existing flag
in a second referendum. Using FPP in the first referendum is a disaster waiting
to happen and could cause ongoing derision for generations to come.
Unless
there is an absolute clear preference (50%+) for just one flag (highly
unlikely) in the first referendum, using the FPP voting system may actually
mean that the LEAST
favoured flag could win and that really would be a
disaster.
Monday, March 31, 2014
Steve Baron: Bon Voyage Michael Laws
Labels: Citizen Democracy, Local government, Michael Laws, Referenda, Steve Baron
Quite by chance, I bumped into Michael Laws as he was packing his car to leave town for his new life in Timaru. Although we have communicated a number of times we had never met, so I took the opportunity to introduce myself and had a short conversation. I could sense a certain amount of despondency about leaving and he voiced his pride and admiration for Wanganui, although raising apprehensions about the problems our city faces.
Being an outspoken public figure is never an easy role to pull off. The Mayoralty vote last year possibly reflected the public’s perception of Michael. Just under half the voters thought highly enough to vote for him while the rest probably wouldn’t touch him with a barge pole.
Being an outspoken public figure is never an easy role to pull off. The Mayoralty vote last year possibly reflected the public’s perception of Michael. Just under half the voters thought highly enough to vote for him while the rest probably wouldn’t touch him with a barge pole.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




