Showing posts with label Treaty breaches. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Treaty breaches. Show all posts
Thursday, April 11, 2024
Geoff Parker: Race-based land laws
Labels: Ancestry-based advantage, Confiscations, Geoff Parker, Gifted Maori land, Maori land rates, Native School Act 1867, Public Works Act, Treaty breaches, Treaty of WaitangiA recent letter to a Northland newspaper protested that land acquired for Maori schools had not been returned to iwi when these facilities were closed. Similarly, there’s yet another Maori occupation of private land in the region, claiming it should be returned because it had once been a school property. Unfortunately, these claims lack both context and fact, which is something this article aims to rectify.
Saturday, February 24, 2024
Sandra Goudie: Waitangi Tribunal – time to go!
Labels: Sandra Goudie, Treaty breaches, Waitangi TribunalThe Waitangi Tribunal must change or be removed following the cessation of historical Treaty settlements by 1992 as stated in the Treaty of Waitangi Act.
Why?
Queen
Victoria spread her cloak over all the peoples of New Zealand in both the Royal
Charter of 1840 and the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi.
Queen Victoria made it clear that all citizens were equal in the law.
Saturday, December 24, 2022
John Robinson: Escape the guilt trap - who really broke the Treaty?
Labels: Co-governace, Dr John Robinson, Real NZ history, Three Waters, Treaty breaches, Tribal CoupThree Waters and separate government: the elephant in the room
Many councils have spoken out against the Three Waters proposal, with most focussing on the high cost and the taking of ownership and control by a new national organisation. The public organisation Democracy Action has spoken against the proposal, “since the undemocratic co-governance provisions will bring more complexity, more bureaucracy, more costs – and a whole lot less democratic accountability”. The Taxpayers’ Union has pointed to “the lies about ‘ownership’, the unsuccessful buy off of the local government sector, and the parliamentary skullduggery”.There was considerable publicity when a group of law academics (professors and PhDs), publicised their opinion that the development of Three Waters raised constitutional concerns, because an entrenched privatisation provision (which was dropped following widespread condemnation) “creates a dangerous precedent”. That provision was a last-minute amendment that the Green Party had insisted on, in order to block possible future privatisation.
The claim that the Greens are opposed to privatisation is smoke and mirrors, a diversion and a con designed to misdirect public attention, away from what is going on. The Three Waters legislation takes all those resources out of public control and gives effective control, that key feature of ownership, to an undefined Maori organisation. That is privatisation in all but name.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)