The election campaign has already brought up its share of extraordinary events: the self-mutilation of the Green Party leadership and the rise of Jacindamania. With those two events the campaign has been transformed as support shifts from NZ First and the Greens to Labour - although based on the latest polling it looks like NZ First will continue to hold the trump card come election night.
In amongst the manias and melt-downs there have been some policy announcements. Prior to the election I will summarise the party policies that particularly affect property investors, but one that is particularly eye-brow raising in a weird way is the announcement by the Opportunities (Gareth Morgan) Party (TOP).
It's not unusual for a minnow party to have policies that are at the extreme of the normal curve, but TOP seems to have more than its fair share of them. The latest is their policy to reform the Residential Tenancy Act.
This is what they are proposing:
- "We will [make] it far easier for a tenant to remain in the premises long-term. This will be achieved by restricting the conditions under which a landlord can evict a tenant to those of non-payment of rent or property damage. Sale of a property is not necessarily a legitimate reason for eviction."
- Introducing warrant of fitness requirements for all rental accommodation.
- Putting a hand-brake on a landlord’s ability to increase rental payments, to "give tenants time to adjust" to the increase. They point out this would not prevent landlords from obtaining market rent; their policy would limit the rate of increase.
Gareth Morgan's policy would trigger the decline of individual landlords, who are typically industrious individuals wanting to do well for themselves, to be replaced by the rise of social housing organisations with large long-term portfolios.
The problem with Mad Hatter policies like these, is that there are already enough lunatics in the House of Representatives to adopt them, if they think there is a block of votes to be had by doing so. Unfortunately the pro-regulation parties fail to see that it is, in fact, over-regulation (the Resource Management Act principally) that is the single biggest cause of inflated land values, but rather than deal with that, they prefer to set more regulation.
Still with news items, it is interesting to read that Bob Jones is building a 12-storey office block made from laminated timber. At 52 metres, the building will be the tallest wooden office building in the world, although there are taller ones used for other purposes. Essentially the structural elements (the column and cross beams) would be of laminated timber not concrete and steel.
Sir Bob was on National Radio last week extolling the virtues of wood framing over steel and concrete, pointing out that laminated wooden timber is stronger and more earthquake resistant, and is more fire resistant.
The wood processing industry is, of course, excited about having such a high profile project promoting their product, and they are encouraging designers and engineers to look at it as a building option. While Sir Bob was unsure of the construction cost savings, he pointed to developers overseas using the product and assumed they would not do so unless it was economic.
Putting that issue aside, laminated timber construction is a massive opportunity for New Zealand, and particularly for timber growing regions like Northland and the East Coast. Sending raw logs overseas does not make a lot of sense, when the logs could be processed here and exported as laminated beams.
Frank Newman writes a weekly article for Property Plus.