Prime minister Jacinda Ardern promised, on the night of her general election triumph last October, to govern for all New Zealanders. But her Labour government is pursuing policies that will entrench racial separatism, undermine democracy, turbocharge the grievance culture and promote polarisation and divisiveness.
The immediate threats come from proposals to outlaw “hate speech”, however that may be defined, and bestow special privilege on people who identify as Maori by allowing city and district councils to create exclusively Maori wards. In the longer term, the government is likely to seize on climate change as justification for policies that could deliver a savage blow to the country’s most dynamic productive sector.
Add to that the politicisation of education, in the form of a new, Marxist-influenced history curriculum that portrays Maori as a race still oppressed by colonialism, and you have a perfect ideological storm. New Zealand sometimes feels as if it’s in the grip of a Year Zero cult similar in tone, if not in scale, to that promoted in Pol Pot’s Kampuchea (Cambodia), where everything that had gone before was renounced.
To take those developments one by one:
■ Urged on by inflammatory rhetoric from an ideologically driven Human Rights Commission and a handful of vociferous immigrant activists whose views are at odds with those of their communities, Labour has vowed to introduce tight controls on what New Zealanders may legally say about matters of race and religion (and very likely gender and body shape too). The government cites the Christchurch mosque massacres as justification, although a royal commission failed to find any evidence that lax “hate speech” laws allowed or even encouraged Brenton Tarrant (who, it should be remembered, was an Australian) to embark on his killing spree.
■ Labour is encouraging the creation of designated Maori seats on city and district councils, despite the idea being resoundingly rejected by voters in local referendums wherever they have been proposed. A law change will not only give Maori (or more correctly, part-Maori) candidates a short cut to representation by enabling them to avoid the inconvenience of winning popular support, but will result in the election of councillors responsible only to people who claim Maori ancestry.
Under present law, any person of Maori descent can stand for office and win a seat, and many do. The crucial difference is that the law change will guarantee seats under a preferential, race-based system. The irony that this is being done in the name of racial equality is lost on leftist zealots.
■ The government is expected to embrace climate change recommendations that would punish the farming sector – now more than ever the country’s economic lifeline following Covid-19’s devastating effect on tourism. Farmers will be rewarded for keeping New Zealand afloat economically for more than 100 years by having their livestock numbers slashed and being ordered to replace diesel utes with electric vehicles. Will this concern Labour MPs? Not likely, since hardly any represent rural constituencies and few show any interest in economic realities. For Labour, the economy is not so much about generating income as redistributing it.
■ Having shamefully ignored New Zealand history in the past, education bureaucrats have taken advantage of an ideological tail-wind by approving a draft curriculum that’s drenched in neo-Marxist identity politics and presents the country’s past as one characterised by the oppressive effects of colonialism on Maori. Will teachers be permitted to mention that colonialism also brought an end to centuries of savage tribal warfare, slavery and cannibalism? Don’t bank on it.
All of this would be alarming enough, but is made more so because no one is standing in the way. New Zealand First, the conservative government coalition partner that acted as a handbrake on Labour between 2017 and 2020, much to the chagrin of the Left, lost all its seats in the election – punishment for a record fatally tarnished by dodgy and opaque backroom dealings.
What, then, of the National party, nominally Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition? Reduced from 56 to 33 seats in the 120-seat parliament, National is in abject disarray – floundering, demoralised and apparently rudderless after its humiliating election rout.
Historically the dominant force in New Zealand politics, it seems to be waiting for a new messiah to guide it out of the wilderness. Current leader Judith Collins rejoices in the sobriquet “Crusher”, bestowed by the media when she was a tough-talking cabinet minister in John Key’s government, but Kitten would be a more appropriate nickname as she allows herself to be browbeaten almost daily by Labour cheerleaders in the parliamentary press gallery.
Ah yes, the press. In a properly functioning democracy, the media can be relied on, when all else fails, to hold governments to account; but not in New Zealand in 2021. Ardern and her government get a free run from admiring journalists – many of them young and female – who are enthralled that their prime minister is internationally feted as a model leader by left-leaning papers such as the New York Times and the Guardian. The media’s capture by the woke left was never better demonstrated than when the country’s biggest print company devoted acres of newsprint over several days to a hand-wringing mea culpa for decades of supposedly racist reporting that marginalised Maori.
None of the above conveys adequately the scale or force of the ideological tsunami currently washing over New Zealand. Other manifestations include the almost complete takeover of the public conversation by proponents of divisive identity politics; the vindictive daily denunciations of people whose opinions, until quite recently, were considered not only legitimate but mainstream; and the massive power grab by people who have reclaimed (or rediscovered) their Maoriness.
The danger is that most New Zealanders, being essentially passive, easy-going and good-natured, will ignore the tumult and just try to get on with lives – until they wake up one morning and realise that the open, tolerant and fair-minded society they grew up in has irrevocably changed.
Karl du Fresne, a freelance journalist, is the former editor of The Dominion newspaper. He blogs at karldufresne.blogspot.co.nz.
4 comments:
So so true Karl. Our futures lay in the hands of those who will rewrite history while ignoring everything that made the country what it is today. Would make interesting reading in about fifty years, would probably be in Maori tho'.
The fear of being tarnished with some sort of label, anti vax, climate change denier, Maori issues or whatever, keeps most New Zealanders views only talked about among friends and family. Dare not make your views made public.
Things will continue almost unabated for quite a few years yet, I feel the worst is yet to come.
Keep your powder dry.
As you say Karl, where is our centre-right opposition. This is where the public should be able to turn in extraordinary times like these for strong leadership and a clear alternative to rally around. But all is quiet on the centre-right front - Collins and Seymour appear to have gone into hibernation!
Perhaps they are playing their cards close to their chests and are waiting to unleash a master counter-attack, but I say that in desperate hope rather than expectation. Like the centre-right throughout the western world, rather than standing up early on against the tidal wave of wokeism, they compromised and apologised. A fatal flaw when facing a fanatical enemy.
Perhaps some of the esteemed authors who blog on this site have political connections and could shed some light on Judith and David's views and plans on these destructive and divisive issues?
Never before can I remember a time in NZ politics when so much was done to so many by so few, and with such little outcry.
Well, if our lame opposition can't mobilise itself pronto then it will be left to the people to express their popular views by protest but as Karl says NZders are notoriously complacent and long-suffering so we're a long way from that yet. When it finally happens it will likely be too late. I don't believe myself but in the words of the song God Defend New Zealand!
DeeM asks, where is the centre-right opposition?
To answer that question; has DeeM forgotten already, that the previous National government signed the Paris Acord on climate change.
The previous National government also signed "The United Nations Declaration of The Rights of Indigenous People." So surely by now, you must realise that National are, & have been for some time, working in tandem to achieve the implementation of AGENDA 21/30. As for the current ACT Party, who were given the National protest vote this election. They were given a free seat by National, & now with another 8 or 9 seats, they still appear to be no more than Nationals Puppets, whose job is introducing 'bills' that their Masters don't want to be blamed for. With the extreme Left Wing Press & TV news channels that we now have, any REAL government opposition, such as New Conservative, will be denied ANY coverage whatsoever.
You're quite right Allan. National are far from perfect. However, I challenge you to tell me any significant country in the world which didn't sign the Paris Accord. Which by the way is a non-binding, do the best you can, type of agreement. That's the only reason most countries signed it. The devil is then in the detail. It's how much you consider is reasonable in cutting emissions. Unlike Labour, ACT/National have taken the view of doing "our fair share". Not anything disproportionate to other countries. In fact, you could argue we're already well ahead of all our trading partners in terms of our emissions per capita (which is the key measure in my view).
ACT are historically a very small party but they did well this election. Maybe some of New Conservatives policies don't appeal to most voters.
Post a Comment