Debunking Hinemoa Elder's racist agenda.
The largest industry within New Zealand is the maori grievance industry. It has the greatest turnover by far of any business enterprise in New Zealand; and here's the kicker.. its completely non profit; it produces nothing; zero; nada; completely a zero sum game. The entire industry is a mind numbingly massive tax payer funded redistribution of wealth. Our best and brightest hop on a plane.. who can blame them?
8 comments:
Nobody has ever explained how New Zealanders benefit from Maori companies. For example if a Maori tribe "owns" all the water in the South Island and taxpayers and ratepayers have to pay to use that water, how do they benefit? Water falls from the sky and in reality all people in the SI have equal rights to it. Maori did not invent water. Councils should control the water. People should pay the least amount of water rates possible.
All these activists are part-European but there is no advantage(at this present point in time) claiming that heritage.
His mature reflections always of interest. Pity he does not read slower. And get rid of the echo.
The smoke gathering in society around Maori grievances is growing denser and thicker. Nobody can help but breathe it, and sooooon, a spark will alight. Heads will come out of sand, and "grow up time" for a majority dreaming "she'll be right"...
Robert, if you search "The Anglo Saxon" on youtube and find this episode, click on "more..." (under the initial preamble below the video) and the word "Transcript" should pop up. Click on that and the transcript will appear on the righthand side of your screen. He does speak quite quickly and he packs a lot of astute comment into his commentaries. I think he is well worth your time to subscribe to, so you then get his new content when it's posted.
The latest is a flare -up again in Wellington council, The Greens and Paul on about getting rid of colonial monuments. All ''Maori'' today are part -European and had there been no colonists none of the activists would have been born. And as for the all-white activists who believe colonisation was never justified and should not have happened then put up or shut up. By your own definition you should not be here, not even as legacy colonisers whjo benefitted from colonisation. If you own land, do a deal to return it to Maori (those part- white folks who ID as 100pc as Maori). Next step is return to a land of your ancestors because as white you should not be here. Don't say you were not responsible as a cop-out. You benefitted from colonisation and its legacy so continuing to do so knowingly makes you culpable. I think Michael Laws' podcast on this issue is bang on.
And following on from Anon@10.57, you woke whities out there that believe the Maori were hard done by; believe the findings of the Waitangi Tribunal without question; and, similarly, that these monuments to past colonisers should be gone, do some real research of our past or, as suggested go back to whence your ancestors came - for you are not a real New Zealander with a pioneering spirit or thankful for the endeavours of those that came before you. You are an easily deceived fool that has likely done nothing for the benefit of this country. Either that, or you are in on the grift?
Anon 1057 again. A work colleague in his early 20s who is part-Maori but totally against the gravy train told me what went on at his high school in New Plymouth. He was told that facts which are negative about Maori and minorities need to be ruled out because they are ''hate facts''. Essentially there is a santised history and the same ''hate fact'' guideline is applied to all such issues. Stuff clearly is on board. I see Stuff and Hipkins and some ''youth parliament'' ''MPS'' are claiming the govt interfered to stop them saying what they want ( by the sounds of it general rants in favour of Green, TPM rainbow , 16yo votes etc and whatever). Somewhat buried in the article, intended clearly for Stuffists, is an official pointing out that they needed to take care what they said as they are NOT saved by parliamentary privilege and need to be aware of libel. Hipkins sounds off, suppression of youth etc. Beat up biased material .
Michael Laws comments are certainly bang on.If he or similar were on msm, or even reported there, msm fortunes would likely restore. I wonder how he would go following the tv news. (provided some brainwashed maori nutter did not get him). Persons gravitate to one or two news or websites and do not search beyond. Very time consuming. Many also very resistatnt to recommendations.I am astonished how few aware of BV or the Platform despite both conveniently and objectively summarising many sources and avoid (mostly) trite and irrational responses..
Post a Comment