Pages

Monday, June 23, 2025

Elizabeth Rata: Letter to the Minister of Education

Sent 22nd June 2025

Hon Erica Stanford
Minister of Education
Parliament Buildings
Wellington

Dear Ms Stanford

I write to ask if you would re-consider the inclusion of Section 9 and Section 127 in the Education and Training Amendment Bill (No 2) 2025 on the basis that they are not relevant to the regulation of the education system. (See the Coalition Agreement’s statement about Treaty relevance.)

Sections 9 and 127 are not relevant because:

  1. The education system should be regulated according to its secular (i.e. neutral) character.
  2. Ethnic identity education does not lead to the achievement required for equitable outcomes.
  3. A knowledge-rich subject curriculum is derived from, and accountable to, disciplinary (i.e. scientific) knowledge and methods, not to the belief systems in Section 127.

I respectfully suggest that a Supplementary Order Paper be used to ensure that the Bill honours the Coalition Agreement.

Sincerely
Elizabeth Rata

Professor Elizabeth Rata is a sociologist of education in the School of Critical Studies, Faculty of Education and Social Work at the University of Auckland where she is Director of the Knowledge in Education Research Unit (KERU).

6 comments:

Janine said...

Probably a bit of a power struggle here between commonsense and ideology. It will be interesting to see what Stanford opts for.....not holding my breathe on this one.

anonymous said...

If the Te Ao ideology clause is not removed, NZ's Ed system is sunk forever. Stanford is very woke.

Anonymous said...

Let's get to the core of this right now. If Minister Stanford does not summarily remove Sects 9 and 127 and all the associated mumbo jumbo from the Act then she herself must be summarily dismissed. Thanks to Elizabeth for spelling out the blindingly obvious, her letter reflects exactly what I said in my submission, none of the rubbish is relevant.

Anonymous said...

Surely ACT and NZ First will vote against this.

Anonymous said...

I honestly don't know why Stanford is in the National Party. She belongs with Labour.

glan011 said...

Stanford is clearly blindly woke.... and weak... and fully indoctrinated and incapable of critical thinking, so not holding my breath.....