Pages

Saturday, June 28, 2025

John Porter: If Reversed it Would be Called Racism

American political economist Benjamin Friedman, author of Religion and the Rise of Capitalism, a basic reassessment of the underpinnings of today’s economics, once compared modern Western society to a bicycle whose forward momentum was kept going by continuing economic growth. He expounded that should that forward-propelling motion slow or cease, the pillars that define our society – our democracies, our individual liberties and social tolerance - would begin to falter.

Further warning, “…if society was unable to get the wheels back in motion, countries would eventually face total societal collapse”. 

I suggest there are any number of factors that would, especially if occurring in a similar time frame, precipitate a collapse of society in New Zealand. But where I see a danger looming on the horizon is the increasing lack of social tolerance - social tolerance that is being severely tested by the constant influence, preference and favouritism being assigned to Maori. 

Influence, preference and favouritism that if reversed, would be, and correctly so, decried as racism!

Now, racism is not always conscious or actually readily visible and is typically categorised as systemic or structural.

Systemic racism transpires when unequal opportunities and outcomes are inbuilt or fundamental to the working of society’s structures and are beneficial to certain parties based on a racial definition.

Is this not what we are seeing in New Zealand now: Unequal benefits and opportunities that are mandated to deliver prescribed outcomes to a particular racial group?

Structural racism on the other hand is a form of racism that is pervasively and deeply embedded in systems, laws, policies and practices, primarily for the oppression of a section of society.

The oppression of a section of society: Is this not what Maori sovereignty activists are undertaking - with no small amount of success - and forcing onto the majority of New Zealand?

Most worryingly this is being embarked on with the support of a government that its coalition partners were adamant was going to be stamped out!

Back in 2016, a lobby group was launched to end what the group labelled, “Māori favouritism.”

The group was called Hobson's Pledge and was and still is, fronted by former National Party leader Don Brash. That group was formed to pressure politicians into opposing race-based laws and preferential Māori seats in Parliament.

Dr Brash said for eight years the National-led government had been pandering to separatist demands. He said everyone should be equal before the law.

"We've got a situation where those who have a Māori ancestor, and I say sometimes only one or two Māori ancestors out of many, are given some constitutional preference."

An emblematic example of this unconstrained racism featured prominently in a recent Waatea News article.

“The Whānau Ora Commissioning Agency has launched the longest ad ever made in Aotearoa urging more Māori to sign up to the Māori Electoral Roll.”

The 30 minute advert features Maori Sovereignty activist Tame Iti reading a 'Māori roll call' of New Zealanders who have recently joined the Maori electoral roll. The ad campaign will go out through TV, radio and billboards.

Get this - part-way through the reading, Iti leaves the room for a cup of tea as the camera stays in the dark, empty room.

A 30-minute call to action encouraging Māori to join the Māori Electoral Roll? Wow. Who pays for that?

The Whānau Ora Commissioning Agency. CEO, John Tamihere. Say no more!

The main funder of the Whānau Ora Commissioning Agency is Te Puni Kōkiri.  Te Puni Kōkiri (the Ministry of Māori Development) is funded by the Government. 

So, there you go, we are indirectly funding racism!

Iti said young Māori need to get involved in politics to make change. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/te-manu-korihi/565053/whanau-ora-launches-nz-s-longest-ever-ad-urging-more-maori-to-join-the-maori-roll

“…young Māori need to get involved in politics to make change.” I say BS to that!

Maori Sovereignty activists “getting Maori on the Maori roll” has only but one very important consequence.

INCREASING THE NUMBER OF MAORI SEATS!

From the Electoral Commission following an OIA request in 2020 –

1.      Electors of Māori descent who are registered on the general rolls are not included in the Māori electoral population used to determine the number of Māori electorates.

2.      The number of general and Māori electorates and electoral populations used to draw electoral boundaries are calculated by the Government Statistician following each Census and Māori Electoral Option in accordance with formula set out in the Electoral Act 1993. The Government Statistician is required to use total population, as MPs represent everyone in New Zealand, not just those who have registered to vote. The number of Māori electorates is calculated by dividing the Māori electoral
population
(473,077) by the South Island quota (65,458) which results in 7 electorates.

It is of little surprise then that Whānau Ora chair Merepeka Raukawa-Tait, a former Te Pāti Māori candidate, has defended the advert as being part of her mission to advance Māori wellbeing.

Why not be truthful, advancing the growth of the Maori roll is the purpose. Nothing more, nothing less!

When questioned about the advert, Minister of Maori Development, Tama Potaka explained that he had asked Māori development agency Te Puni Kōkiri, funding manager for Whānau Ora, to review the advert and ensure public money had not been used for “electioneering”.

“If public funding which has been set up to help whānau in need has been used for electioneering, that is unacceptable.” No sh-t Sherlock! This is a well-worn path!

These so called “leaders” of the Maori sovereignty movement expertly epitomize the stupidity and inanity of their cause.

Rawiri Waititi, during the parliamentary debate on the suspension of Maori Party MP’s, self-importantly proclaimed ‘…we will not be assimilated…we make no apology for being absolutely, unapologetically, unfettered, unbridled Maori human beings…” 

At best, most activists, if not all, would have no more than 25% of Maori blood in their veins! By that fact itself: They are not Maori!

They are IMPOSTORS and CHARLATANS perpetrating a massive fraud on our country.

And what makes this worse, the asinine chumps we have foolishly elected to protect our democracy are blissfully abetting its demise!

I suggest there is a bigger problem that needs to be solved if we are to retain our country.

Are we a strange people or not? So many New Zealanders stood up and were counted and protested against the abhorrent apartheid regime in South Africa.

Yet when racism is staring us in the face in our own country, we are totally apathetic!

Are we sleepwalking into He Puapua/Maori sovereignty? There is going to be a lot of shocked and disillusioned people clutching their pearls when this happens!

The moral outrage will be vast. But too late folks the horse called democracy will have bolted! 

John Porter is a citizen, deeply concerned about the incremental loss of  democracy and the insidious promotion of separatism. 

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sometimes a country like nz (sorry, Aotearoa) will have to learn the hard way. Those who like democracy will leave, while those left behind will find themselves in a bizarre version of east germany, with stasi type control from maori elites. Poverty and crime will be rife. English will likely be banned or barely used as it will be seen to be a racist language. Your house will suddenly be declared as being on maori land. You will of course be able to sell it to iwi tribes, but only at a price that they approve. The nz dollar will tank so that any savings you have will be worth next to nothing in other currencies. Just like in South Africa, it will be almost impossible for a white person to get a job. The western allies will be of little or no help as they will say quite rightly that kiwis voted for this in a free and fair election and did nothing to support democracy and equality when they still.had the chance.

Anonymous said...

“Influence, preference and favouritism that if reversed, would be, and correctly so, decried as racism!“

No, this is racism. Anything positive or negative that is defined by racial identity is racism by definition.

Ironically, a lot of the racism is structural now & does not favour whities

anonymous said...

This will never be put in such bald terms - i.e. a 2 tier society - in any constitutional debate and/or referendum.... the intention is to brainwash non-Maori into thinking they owe eternal redress due to their colonial sins 2 centuries ago.

Chuck Bird said...

John, I strongly agree that there should be a referendum on the continuation of the racist Maori seats especially because of the seat overhang which they hope to increase. However, telling people who identify as Maori they are not Maori is not helpful. Peters and Seymour identify as Maori. Would you say Peters is Maori as he is half Maori but Seymour is not Maori. Would you say that the Mongrel Mob and Black Power are Maori gangs even though most members are not half Maori? Many people including me say that our Cabinet is 35% Maori. Would you agree?

Anonymous said...

I remember 1981 well and asked the same question recently.
Where are all those who protested ?
The pollies appear oblivious to what they are inflicting upon us.

anonymous said...

The quantum battle has been won. Maori now insist on the terms Maori ( covers any degree of ancestry) or non-Maori ( all others). Pakeha is reserved to remind Europeans of the eternal obligation for redress - till the economy collapses. Cannot see China paying for settlements in perpetuity

anonymous said...

And - this could come very fast.

Anonymous said...

Its apartheid, just like the state of Israel, where the minority subjugate the majority because of some “perceived sacred text”.

Janine said...

A pretty astute comment, anonymous at 8.57. Pretty much as I see it. People will have to learn the hard way. With all good intentions and with much research you try and convince your fellow citizens but they simply don't seem to believe you.

Anonymous said...

Once again, John Porter's analysis above is spot on as to the effects of what Luxon and Potaka inc. are doing and it has to be called out repeatedly in as many forums as we can muster since the MSM are bloody useless. The Maori seats must go - now! The Waitangi Tribunal must go - now! Pandering to the Tamihere led factions must stop - now! End all co-governance - now! Aka - end NZ Apartheid - now!

anonymous said...

No doubt it - NZ has a different mindset. Including attitudes to actual aspiration, work and self-reliance.

anonymous said...

A former colleagues learnt the hard way - family farm and assets in Zimbabwe destroyed/confiscated. Parents had real penury in retirement. She had a modest pension from an overseas job - her only income. Had to live where she could survive on these means. Moral: this can happen.

glan011 said...

Yep...... and so glad I'm due to be dead - and no kids....

Anonymous said...

Debunking Hinemoa Elder's racist agenda - Anglo Saxon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AEvoixEvw4

Fred H. said...

The only way to achieve a state where all people are equal under the law is to abolish:
1) the Maori Roll
2) the Maori Seats
3) the Waitangi Tribunal
4) all reference to the Treaty of Waitangi from legislaton;

AND find a government that does what is promises to do.

The first Four could be achieved easily if finding an honest government could be achieved.

What chance is there with National, Labour, Greens, The Part-Maori Party, and doubt about New Zealand First ?

The only Man standing is David Seymour. Voters must therfore give ACT many, many more MPs and Natioinal many, many fewer.

Barrie Davis said...

The phrases ‘systemic racism’ and ‘structural racism’ are examples of nominalization where complex social dynamics described with verbs or adjectives are condensed into abstract noun phrases, although what is named is not a real and tangible object.
From linguistics, nominalizations delete who is doing what, when and how, leaving only what is done and so can introduce ambiguity and obscure agency; for example, “Mistakes were made.” Nominalizations turn active, ongoing processes into static concepts, making them appear fixed and unchangeable. For example, instead of describing how two people interact, we might say, “Their relationship is broken”, treating the relationship as a fixed state rather than something dynamic. Nominalizations are not just grammatical forms – they are worldview containers. Every abstract noun locks away an action, a choice, a dynamic event.
Here are diagnostic questions which you can apply when encountering abstract nouns:
- Can I turn this noun into a verb or adjective?
- Is someone doing something here, but they're not named?
- What’s the hidden action or process?
Would you like to find out more about how linguistics can be used to analyze politics in the media?