If what I have listened to recently is true, then yes, Labour and National most definitely are. My source is a podcast from Stop Co-Governance. This is a podcast that talks about matters of race with particular regard to Māori. I put credence on what is discussed for ONE reason: it goes a long way to explaining Luxon’s behaviour and attitude when it comes to Māori issues.
The matters referred to started with the Key Government, when they were in coalition with the Māori Party. We are all aware Key has been mentoring Luxon. The ‘game’ is the tribal takeover of New Zealand. It is based on an article written by someone calling themselves Pee Kay. This person suggests National is working with the Māori activists to take over the country. That sounds pretty unbelievable…until you look at National’s attitude on these matters.
The Key Government and the Māori Party, through their confidence and supply arrangements, began doing trade-offs with each other. Effectively: you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours. From that point, the Māori sovereignty activists’ belief in their agenda was amplified and they began getting serious traction towards achieving their goals of a new constitution and dual sovereignty. There was also the goal of FULL MĀORI CONTROL BY 2040. Two years later, in 2010, Key announced the government’s support for the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Then, in 2019, the Labour Party commissioned a group of university academics to write the He Puapua Report. This is basically a blueprint for the takeover of New Zealand by Māori activists. All of the above, and what has come since, is based on the myth that there was a ‘partnership’ between Māori and the Crown. That means everything – power, resources, etc – was supposed to be shared. This, as we know, is totally untrue.
But He Puapua went beyond sharing. It was the founding document to replace our democracy – a radical restructure that comprises a Māori government and a government for Non-Māori. Here’s the kicker: a structure where Māori have the POWER OF VETO. And what that effectively means is Māori ARE the government. Claire Charters, the lead author of the report, wants Māori sovereignty enshrined in law as soon as possible. This is because of the terrible effects of colonisation on Māori.
Charters then makes the outrageous claim – a blatant lie – that “the proven effectiveness of Māori leading their own solutions has been demonstrated numerous times in Aotearoa”. If that were true, then why are the statistics the way they are: all negative in the case of Māori. This nonsense re the effects of colonisation and the myth of sovereignty is still being perpetuated by Waititi and the Māori Party now.
Yet, at the Kohimārama Conference in 1860, where 144 chiefs met after trialling the Treaty for 20 years, they said they wanted four things – British government, British law, Christianity and the Queen and the Governor to be their parents. Pee Kay, the writer of the article, asks who the puppeteer that is running this radical activist movement is. He suspects it’s the Iwi Leaders Forum. This group, formed in 2005, is made up of the chairs from 71 tribes whose stated claim is Māori autonomy and self-governance, with Māori being in control of the government.
It was the brainchild of Mark Solomon, a former leader of Ngāi Tahu, and others involved include Margaret Mutu and Tuku Morgan. Pee Kay asks who is funding this group. Is it the government and us the taxpayers? This is something the group strenuously denied. But thanks to Winston Peters doing some digging in 2013, we found out IT WAS. Three million was given to prepare an application by the group to become a “commissioning agency” responsible for millions of dollars in funding to Whānau Ora.
They were being given OUR money to be used in applying for even more money. Honestly, you couldn’t make this stuff up…but it gets worse. Pee Kay found evidence the Ministry of Environment indirectly gave them $3.8 million in the years 2012–2017. That was right in the middle of the Key Government, which means, in effect, funding was coming from the NATIONAL PARTY. The obvious next question is: what about all the other ministries. Did they give money as well?
The National Party have had a very close – chummy – relationship with the Iwi Leaders Forum. During the Key years, 2009 to 2017, they met 44 times. Of those 44, only 15 had a discussion topic. What was discussed in those 29 meetings that the public are unaware of? What we have here is a problem with both the National and Labour parties in terms of getting too close to those who hold the reins of power in Māoridom.
You should now understand the reluctance of Luxon to move on the race issues he campaigned on and his reluctance to support the Treaty Principles Bill. There is every reason to suspect he’s being held to ransom by the likes of the people Pee Kay mentions. Another question is how close are the Māori Party to these people. Hipkins will be no different to Luxon in handling these matters. They are probably both in the same waka and paddling furiously for Māori dominance.
JC is a right-wing crusader. Reached an age that embodies the dictum only the good die young. This article was first published HERE
The Key Government and the Māori Party, through their confidence and supply arrangements, began doing trade-offs with each other. Effectively: you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours. From that point, the Māori sovereignty activists’ belief in their agenda was amplified and they began getting serious traction towards achieving their goals of a new constitution and dual sovereignty. There was also the goal of FULL MĀORI CONTROL BY 2040. Two years later, in 2010, Key announced the government’s support for the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Then, in 2019, the Labour Party commissioned a group of university academics to write the He Puapua Report. This is basically a blueprint for the takeover of New Zealand by Māori activists. All of the above, and what has come since, is based on the myth that there was a ‘partnership’ between Māori and the Crown. That means everything – power, resources, etc – was supposed to be shared. This, as we know, is totally untrue.
But He Puapua went beyond sharing. It was the founding document to replace our democracy – a radical restructure that comprises a Māori government and a government for Non-Māori. Here’s the kicker: a structure where Māori have the POWER OF VETO. And what that effectively means is Māori ARE the government. Claire Charters, the lead author of the report, wants Māori sovereignty enshrined in law as soon as possible. This is because of the terrible effects of colonisation on Māori.
Charters then makes the outrageous claim – a blatant lie – that “the proven effectiveness of Māori leading their own solutions has been demonstrated numerous times in Aotearoa”. If that were true, then why are the statistics the way they are: all negative in the case of Māori. This nonsense re the effects of colonisation and the myth of sovereignty is still being perpetuated by Waititi and the Māori Party now.
Yet, at the Kohimārama Conference in 1860, where 144 chiefs met after trialling the Treaty for 20 years, they said they wanted four things – British government, British law, Christianity and the Queen and the Governor to be their parents. Pee Kay, the writer of the article, asks who the puppeteer that is running this radical activist movement is. He suspects it’s the Iwi Leaders Forum. This group, formed in 2005, is made up of the chairs from 71 tribes whose stated claim is Māori autonomy and self-governance, with Māori being in control of the government.
It was the brainchild of Mark Solomon, a former leader of Ngāi Tahu, and others involved include Margaret Mutu and Tuku Morgan. Pee Kay asks who is funding this group. Is it the government and us the taxpayers? This is something the group strenuously denied. But thanks to Winston Peters doing some digging in 2013, we found out IT WAS. Three million was given to prepare an application by the group to become a “commissioning agency” responsible for millions of dollars in funding to Whānau Ora.
They were being given OUR money to be used in applying for even more money. Honestly, you couldn’t make this stuff up…but it gets worse. Pee Kay found evidence the Ministry of Environment indirectly gave them $3.8 million in the years 2012–2017. That was right in the middle of the Key Government, which means, in effect, funding was coming from the NATIONAL PARTY. The obvious next question is: what about all the other ministries. Did they give money as well?
The National Party have had a very close – chummy – relationship with the Iwi Leaders Forum. During the Key years, 2009 to 2017, they met 44 times. Of those 44, only 15 had a discussion topic. What was discussed in those 29 meetings that the public are unaware of? What we have here is a problem with both the National and Labour parties in terms of getting too close to those who hold the reins of power in Māoridom.
You should now understand the reluctance of Luxon to move on the race issues he campaigned on and his reluctance to support the Treaty Principles Bill. There is every reason to suspect he’s being held to ransom by the likes of the people Pee Kay mentions. Another question is how close are the Māori Party to these people. Hipkins will be no different to Luxon in handling these matters. They are probably both in the same waka and paddling furiously for Māori dominance.
JC is a right-wing crusader. Reached an age that embodies the dictum only the good die young. This article was first published HERE
No comments:
Post a Comment