Pages

Sunday, October 12, 2025

Steven Gaskell: Democracy Strikes Back - 66% of New Zealanders Say “No” to Māori Wards


Well, isn’t this a delightful surprise? After years of the Left lecturing, brow-beating, and rewriting history, ordinary New Zealanders have finally said what most of us have been thinking all along: 66 percent of councils have voted “No” to these undemocratic, race-based Māori wards. The people have spoken and the social engineers are sulking.

For too long, the Left has tried to impose its vision of “co-governance” everywhere from council chambers to dog park under the thin disguise of “representation.” But these wards were never about democracy. They were about ideology, identity politics, and guaranteeing seats for a select group regardless of competence or accountability. A seat reserved by ancestry is, by definition, not democratic.

Across the country in Whakatāne, New Plymouth, Rotorua, Hawke’s Bay and beyond voters have stood up and said, “You can’t just hand power to someone because of their ancestry earn it like the rest of us.” Even Hamilton, despite its progressive zealots, is only narrowly holding on to its Māori ward. The message is loud and clear: if you want to be in local government, you earn it the democratic way, not by waving a cultural identity card.

Of course, the Left is having a meltdown. Suddenly “local democracy” only counts when the result goes their way. Voters are “uninformed” and “need education.” Funny how democracy works when the majority actually has a spine. Perhaps the lesson is simple: if you want power, campaign for it don’t demand it because your ancestors had a treaty two centuries ago.

So congratulations to the 66 percent of Kiwis who rejected these race-based wards. You’ve reminded the Left that you can lecture all you like, but you can’t legislate your way around democracy. The wards were a bad idea; the results prove it. The activists can shout and cry, but the rest of us can enjoy the sound of common sense winning.

Let this be a blueprint for next year’s election. God forbid the Left walks through the front door they’re already trying the back one.

The Back Door to Co-Governance

Instead of openly debating co-governance in Parliament where messy things like votes and accountability happen the Local Government Commission is quietly recommending that councils adopt “principles of the Treaty” as if they were handed down from Mount Sinai. The problem? Many of these “principles” were invented long after the Treaty itself. They conveniently translate to: more race-based seats, more veto power, and more say for iwi leaders over the people you actually elected.

The only question is whether we’ll slam the back door shut before co-governance becomes permanent furniture or keep paying our rates while democracy slips out the window.

1. Māori Political Backlash and Protest

Here comes the predictable outrage. Māori political activists led by Te Pāti Māori and assorted iwi leaders are already calling the results a “setback for representation” and “majority tyranny.” Translation: democracy’s fine as long as it delivers the right answer.

Expect the usual routine hikoi, placards, and accusations that believing in one person, one vote is “racist.” Don’t be surprised when someone demands Parliament override local voters and re-impose the wards by law. Nothing says representation like cancelling the electorate.

2. Councils That Kept Māori Wards

For the handful of councils clinging to Māori wards congratulations, you’ve volunteered for an experiment in political sociology. Expect higher costs, endless consultation committees, and “Treaty partnership advisors” explaining why nothing ever gets done. Ratepayers, of course, will pick up the bill.

In these councils, disagreement will equal racism and debate will be replaced by deference. It’s not representation it’s intimidation dressed as inclusion.

3. The Political Fallout

Nationally, the divide is crystal clear. On one side, New Zealanders who believe in equality under the law. On the other, activists who think equality is oppression. The Left’s reaction has been to insist the public “needs more education” which really means being told they were wrong until they agree.

Democracy has spoken, and the activist class can’t stand the sound of it.

4. The Long Game

This debate will be back, repackaged under a new name like “community partnership zones.” Same policy, new branding. But for now, common sense has won. Sixty-six percent of New Zealanders have made it clear: if you want a seat at the table, you earn it through democracy, not decree.

Steven is an entrepreneur and an ex RNZN diver who likes travelling, renovating houses, Swiss Watches, history, chocolate art and art deco.

30 comments:

Doug Longmire said...

To our great shame, the voters of Palmerston North have voted to keep Maori wards. Incredible, because the previous referendum (years ago) the voting was 70% against Maori wards.

Reggie said...

But what’s interesting is how little reporting of this topic is in the main stream media… virtually nothing! I’m not sure what was on the TV news (surprise, I don’t watch it!) although I understand nothing on TV3 news. When will they get it? The majority of Kiwis don’t want their politics soured with race based bias and we want professional, unbiased reporting!

Anonymous said...

Sixty six percent of New Zealanders said what Luxon was too afraid to say.

Anonymous said...

If the govt changes wards will be imposed to honour the treaty. Hastings mayor has already made it clear that Maori radicals will have a say anyway.

ihcpcoro said...

Any reaction from our PM?

Anonymous said...

Remember in May last year, 52 mayors and local body chairmen signed a letter to Luxon, opposing the polls by voters over Maori wards. These mayors where against the public having a say on how they should be represented.

One of those signatories was long time Upper Hutt mayor Wayne Guppy. That's why I didn’t vote for him, and I'm pleased to say that he has been dumped.

Obviously it will only take a change in central government for Maori wards to be imposed again with greater powers than before, but it's still good to see consequences for decisions politicians make without a mandate.

Anonymous said...

I looked everywhere for the overall Maori ward results and finally found this: well done - this deserves to be on every front page except Oh Dear it wasn't the result Lefties were looking for. Google ``Maori wards'' in news and see yourself.

Peter said...

I'm pleased at the overall outcome, but appalled by the ignorant, apathetic, complacent, anti-democracy-loving fools that I live amongst in the Wellington region. It just proves that 'Woke Wellington' is out of step with the rest of the country and all-but beyond redemption.

Anonymous said...

I hope the writer gets the leftist outrage he obviously wants: not picking it up here. The result is pretty predictable, given that the biggest demographic represented in actual local body voters is that of 60+ pakeha. Not sure that ACT, one of the leaders of the charge, will be especially happy either, as they don't seem to have many candidates returned. Where I am, a very right-voting area, they got 1/7.

Anonymous said...

Hmm. I see the results as resoundingly negative. Twenty years ago we were outraged at Maori wards and HC, Dear Leader and darling of the left, wasn’t even having it. Now it’s “only in Maori-majority areas” like Gisborne and Whakatane. The way we’re tracking, and I don’t think this is a crazy notion, we are heading for more and more of these wards being ok’d by New Zealanders in subsequent elections: “binding” or not.
In twenty years’ time we’ll look back on this election and think we were ignorant, backward and racist.
The trend is bad and the celebrations are premature.

Anonymous said...

This shows the painful truth that the left can do activism and the hard yards, and the right just expect things to go their way. The number of councils rejecting maori wards should have been much higher. This is the start of a slippery slope and maori wards will be back in the next labour-led government.

Anonymous said...

If Mayors can override "wards" like Mahe Drysdale in Tauranga by simply appointing paid Maori with full voting rights to Council, what was the point of this exercise ?
It now takes government to pass legislation to stop the likes of Drysdale .

Oh, darn, Luxon is in charge of NZ, and he would not even pass the Treaty Principles Bill, ignoring the submissions of hundreds of thousands of Kiwis that were clearly in favor.
So much for democracy - we appear to be under the thumb of yet another dictatorial regime.

anonymous said...

Longer term, this evolution in attitude is quite possible.
The stealth strategy has worked well.

anonymous said...

Decisions on many issues will be reversed by another Left govt - and very easily.

Basil Walker said...

It was virtually only a North Island vote . The majority of the South Island did not get the opportunity to participate . We are part of NZ PM Luxon .

Anonymous said...

South Wairarapa’s “keep the Māori ward” vote looks less like a triumph of democracy than a shrug.
Barely 44% of electors turned out, and the margin was just 384 votes in a district of nearly 10,000.
The ward itself? Only 150 Māori ballots cast from 469 on the roll, with the winner taking 95 votes — roughly 1% of all enrolled residents.
When that few people bother to vote, power defaults to whoever’s organised enough to show up. In the end, the loudest voices win because everyone else stayed home.
When apathy becomes a majority, democracy becomes a rumour.



— PB

Janine said...

It doesn't really matter now whether there are hikois or protests. We can be comfortable knowing most New Zealanders favour democracy. The mainstream media would have had us believe otherwise.

Anonymous said...

With the numbers available at this time and by my spreadsheet calculations (if they are correct?)

The majority of Councils have voted to remove Maori Wards

Total Councils 42 - - 25 Voted to remove Maori Wards and 17 to keep Maori Wards.

In round figures that is 60% Remove and 40% to Keep Maori Wards

BUT......

So far there has been a TOTAL of 74,8660 individual votes counted on the Local Gov’t Maori Ward referendum nationwide.

35,9106 in favor of removing and 38,9554 to keep Maori Wards.

Percentage wise this is Remove 48% and 52% to keep Maori Wards.

So if a nationwide referendum on Maori Wards was held today it is very likely that it would be a positive result FOR Maori Wards.

Anonymous said...


“When apathy becomes a majority, democracy becomes a rumour.”

Exactly. The majority, 68.39% decided not to participate in societies governance and cast their vote. The minority, 31.61% cast their vote of which 51% will determine societies governance. How’s that for majority rules!!
If you are not part of societies governance – you are a slave. Communists don’t want you to vote. Think about it! Anyone that tells you not to vote is collaborating with the enemy.

Anonymous said...

what does 74,8660 mean, is a comma in the wrong place as this looks like Mata-wotsit Maori maths ....?

Basil Walker said...

Anon 11:54 Your spreadsheet ? Remember global warming spreadsheets? Garbage in garbage out .

Sis said...

Yes. But you’re not part of Aotearoa. Maybe that’s why the South Island got ignored?

Anonymous said...

@Basil and Anon 2:13pm - yes, sorry comma in the wrong place - should read Total: 748,660 individual votes, Remove votes 359,106, and Keep votes 389,554.

Anonymous said...

Will electorates like Palmerston North who have retained Maori Wards also keep their unelected Maori appointees on Council committees? It was previously justified by saying Maori ward councilors not necessarily local tribal members but appointed individuals were.!! Talk about double dipping. Also what these liberal white lefties don't realize in their ignorance is that when tribal rule takes over, they will be at the bottom of the pile and treated like kuri tutae

Jason said...

The south island doesnt have moari wards because it doesnt suit ngai tahu's agenda.
They could end up with a tanui or ngati poro or any number of others , that wouldnt necessarily vote in line with ngai tahu's business interests!
ngai tahu has been busily but quietly keeping maori wards on the down low......Another glaring omission from our publicly funded MSM

Anonymous said...

To anon at 11.36...The whites who are pro part-Maori rule are happy to play a supplicant role to assuage their professed guilt. They also like to have a bob each way; that is deplore colonisation (selectively, never persons of colour, tribes etc invading and conquering neighbours as in Africa, Central and South America, or Japan's empire building of the 1890s-1945 etc).
An example is a Scottish nationalist I know and her NZ husband of irish extraction and pro IRA. Both in their 70s and say colonisation should never have happened. It was not justified. However, I suggested to them that to clear their professed guilt they could sell their two properties worth nudging 2 million and transfer some money to ''Maori'' (white folks with trace Maori via Iwi) or do a deal and hand over the properties. They could then help decolonise by returning to their ancestral homelands and clear their guilt, because they said colonisation was NOT justified. I got the old ''it was not our fault'' line. I pointed out that it is, because they are LEGACY colonisers and they have benefitted for decades from ''oppressing'' Maori as a result and now they can make up for it. Oh no, that would be silly, they said. Ummm, bob each way...wax woke and act fat cat coloniser.
I heard the same some years ago from a prominent Scot who migrated here young and writes about rugby. Nationalist, wanted the Commonwealth games scrapped, evil empire etc. Yet he is happy to live here as a latter day coloniser waxing woke. Hypocrite.
The Scot I know in her 70s will not take out NZ citizenship because it means allegiance to Charles, so she is stuck with a UK passport she does not want either as she is Scottish and her hatred of England has intensified over the years. Staunch labour Green. She is entitled to her views, of course, and does not hesitate to lambast others of ''wrong'' views but gets angry and cancels those who disagree . Ex media.
They support Maori wards, clip-on seats with voting rights and ultimately a Maori say over legislation because they think it will help ensure a permanent Lab-Green government. The same with a consitution enshrining a co-governance version of the treaty. You won't be able to stand unless you pledge to comply with it. That should effectively ban Act and NZ First type parties. Nats would comply and squirm to protect their assets . I find that party as slippery as an eel. However, TPM and associates are merely using lab-Green to advance their own cause. ''Maori'' rule 100pc.
I do not see colonisation as all bad. It has been going on for thousands of years; some dreadful impacts. Same post-colonial period when tribes fight to assert dominance in newly independent states. Yet also some good has come from it. We can finger point the good and bad all day and get nowhere.

Barend Vlaardingerbroek said...

>"The Scot I know in her 70s will not take out NZ citizenship because it means allegiance to Charles, so she is stuck with a UK passport she does not want either as she is Scottish and her hatred of England has intensified over the years."
Although the Scots did not vote for independence last time, they may well do so in the future, especially given the backlash against mass illegal immigration there. The 'United' in 'UK' stands for the union of crowns of England and Scotland. Scottish independence would end this union and Scotland would be able to reinstate its own monarchy if they so chose. Within the next few years your mate may be carrying a Scottish passport and have a Scottish king or queen (or no king or queen at all).

Anonymous said...

To Barend ..anon replying ...
the SNP is pro- immigation and diversity and very anti- Reform etc billing them racists. I am a Scot and England mix more so Cornish and UK and NZ citizen born here. I oppose the SNP sellout to rule by the EU in its current form. Problem is both countries have drifted apart politically since the 80s but going back further shows the trend. In the mid 50s the Tories were dominant. Times have changed indeed. The pending Holyrood elections will be of interest

Barend Vlaardingerbroek said...

From the SNP website:
"Scotland needs an immigration policy suited to our specific circumstances and needs. Scotland needs people to want to work here, in our businesses, our universities and in our public services."
So it's a very qualified "pro-immigration policy".

Anonymous said...

Anon at 10.17am:
“I heard the same some years ago from a prominent Scot who migrated here young and writes about rugby. Nationalist, wanted the Commonwealth games scrapped, evil empire etc. Yet he is happy to live here as a latter day coloniser waxing woke. Hypocrite.”

lol. That’s more than enough to identify who that is 99.9 percent.
At least for me. A nightmare to edit because he would use 75 words in a sentence brimming with subsidiary clauses, lack lustre imagery and stale figures of speech — when 30 would do the same job just fine.
Writes for an audience of one.

— PB