For too long, the Left has tried to impose its vision of “co-governance” everywhere from council chambers to dog park under the thin disguise of “representation.” But these wards were never about democracy. They were about ideology, identity politics, and guaranteeing seats for a select group regardless of competence or accountability. A seat reserved by ancestry is, by definition, not democratic.
Across the country in Whakatāne, New Plymouth, Rotorua, Hawke’s Bay and beyond voters have stood up and said, “You can’t just hand power to someone because of their ancestry earn it like the rest of us.” Even Hamilton, despite its progressive zealots, is only narrowly holding on to its Māori ward. The message is loud and clear: if you want to be in local government, you earn it the democratic way, not by waving a cultural identity card.
Of course, the Left is having a meltdown. Suddenly “local democracy” only counts when the result goes their way. Voters are “uninformed” and “need education.” Funny how democracy works when the majority actually has a spine. Perhaps the lesson is simple: if you want power, campaign for it don’t demand it because your ancestors had a treaty two centuries ago.
So congratulations to the 66 percent of Kiwis who rejected these race-based wards. You’ve reminded the Left that you can lecture all you like, but you can’t legislate your way around democracy. The wards were a bad idea; the results prove it. The activists can shout and cry, but the rest of us can enjoy the sound of common sense winning.
Let this be a blueprint for next year’s election. God forbid the Left walks through the front door they’re already trying the back one.
The Back Door to Co-Governance
Instead of openly debating co-governance in Parliament where messy things like votes and accountability happen the Local Government Commission is quietly recommending that councils adopt “principles of the Treaty” as if they were handed down from Mount Sinai. The problem? Many of these “principles” were invented long after the Treaty itself. They conveniently translate to: more race-based seats, more veto power, and more say for iwi leaders over the people you actually elected.
The only question is whether we’ll slam the back door shut before co-governance becomes permanent furniture or keep paying our rates while democracy slips out the window.
1. Māori Political Backlash and Protest
Here comes the predictable outrage. Māori political activists led by Te Pāti Māori and assorted iwi leaders are already calling the results a “setback for representation” and “majority tyranny.” Translation: democracy’s fine as long as it delivers the right answer.
Expect the usual routine hikoi, placards, and accusations that believing in one person, one vote is “racist.” Don’t be surprised when someone demands Parliament override local voters and re-impose the wards by law. Nothing says representation like cancelling the electorate.
2. Councils That Kept Māori Wards
For the handful of councils clinging to Māori wards congratulations, you’ve volunteered for an experiment in political sociology. Expect higher costs, endless consultation committees, and “Treaty partnership advisors” explaining why nothing ever gets done. Ratepayers, of course, will pick up the bill.
In these councils, disagreement will equal racism and debate will be replaced by deference. It’s not representation it’s intimidation dressed as inclusion.
3. The Political Fallout
Nationally, the divide is crystal clear. On one side, New Zealanders who believe in equality under the law. On the other, activists who think equality is oppression. The Left’s reaction has been to insist the public “needs more education” which really means being told they were wrong until they agree.
Democracy has spoken, and the activist class can’t stand the sound of it.
4. The Long Game
This debate will be back, repackaged under a new name like “community partnership zones.” Same policy, new branding. But for now, common sense has won. Sixty-six percent of New Zealanders have made it clear: if you want a seat at the table, you earn it through democracy, not decree.
Steven is an entrepreneur and an ex RNZN diver who likes travelling, renovating houses, Swiss Watches, history, chocolate art and art deco.
11 comments:
To our great shame, the voters of Palmerston North have voted to keep Maori wards. Incredible, because the previous referendum (years ago) the voting was 70% against Maori wards.
But what’s interesting is how little reporting of this topic is in the main stream media… virtually nothing! I’m not sure what was on the TV news (surprise, I don’t watch it!) although I understand nothing on TV3 news. When will they get it? The majority of Kiwis don’t want their politics soured with race based bias and we want professional, unbiased reporting!
Sixty six percent of New Zealanders said what Luxon was too afraid to say.
If the govt changes wards will be imposed to honour the treaty. Hastings mayor has already made it clear that Maori radicals will have a say anyway.
Any reaction from our PM?
Remember in May last year, 52 mayors and local body chairmen signed a letter to Luxon, opposing the polls by voters over Maori wards. These mayors where against the public having a say on how they should be represented.
One of those signatories was long time Upper Hutt mayor Wayne Guppy. That's why I didn’t vote for him, and I'm pleased to say that he has been dumped.
Obviously it will only take a change in central government for Maori wards to be imposed again with greater powers than before, but it's still good to see consequences for decisions politicians make without a mandate.
I looked everywhere for the overall Maori ward results and finally found this: well done - this deserves to be on every front page except Oh Dear it wasn't the result Lefties were looking for. Google ``Maori wards'' in news and see yourself.
I'm pleased at the overall outcome, but appalled by the ignorant, apathetic, complacent, anti-democracy-loving fools that I live amongst in the Wellington region. It just proves that 'Woke Wellington' is out of step with the rest of the country and all-but beyond redemption.
I hope the writer gets the leftist outrage he obviously wants: not picking it up here. The result is pretty predictable, given that the biggest demographic represented in actual local body voters is that of 60+ pakeha. Not sure that ACT, one of the leaders of the charge, will be especially happy either, as they don't seem to have many candidates returned. Where I am, a very right-voting area, they got 1/7.
Hmm. I see the results as resoundingly negative. Twenty years ago we were outraged at Maori wards and HC, Dear Leader and darling of the left, wasn’t even having it. Now it’s “only in Maori-majority areas” like Gisborne and Whakatane. The way we’re tracking, and I don’t think this is a crazy notion, we are heading for more and more of these wards being ok’d by New Zealanders in subsequent elections: “binding” or not.
In twenty years’ time we’ll look back on this election and think we were ignorant, backward and racist.
The trend is bad and the celebrations are premature.
This shows the painful truth that the left can do activism and the hard yards, and the right just expect things to go their way. The number of councils rejecting maori wards should have been much higher. This is the start of a slippery slope and maori wards will be back in the next labour-led government.
Post a Comment