The Atlantic recently ran a story headlined “He Was Homeschooled for Years, and Fell So Far Behind.” It profiles Stefan Merrill Block, who was homeschooled in his early years and later struggled to catch up once he entered traditional schooling. But one rough experience doesn’t invalidate an entire movement that is delivering superior results for millions of families across the country.
Homeschool students are outperforming kids in government schools by a wide margin. Brian Ray’s peer-reviewed systematic review in the Journal of School Choice examined dozens of studies on the topic. Seventy-eight percent of those studies found homeschoolers scoring significantly higher academically than their public school peers. They beat traditional school kids by 15 to 25 percentile points on standardized tests. These solid results hold up regardless of family background, income level, and whether the parents ever held a teaching certificate.
Click to view - Image Credit: Meta-analysis by National Home Education Research Institute
Government schools deliver exactly the opposite outcome. In Chicago alone, there are 55 public schools where not a single kid tests proficient in math. They spend about $30,000 per student each year and still fail to produce basic proficiency. The Nation’s Report Card shows nearly 80 percent of US kids aren’t proficient in math. That’s the real crisis staring us in the face, and it demands accountability from the system that claims to serve our children.
The critics who demand tighter rules on homeschooling never mention these disasters in public education. They won’t even consider shutting down the failing public schools that waste billions of taxpayer dollars and fail thousands of kids every year. But when families opt out and choose something better for their kids? Suddenly it’s time for government oversight and heavy-handed regulations. This double standard exposes the true agenda at play.
Teachers’ unions watch the collapse of academic achievement and never push for less funding. Every bad score just becomes another excuse for more cash grabs from the public. If they really thought homeschool was underperforming, they’d be calling for gobs of taxpayer money to fix it.
This logical inconsistency gives away the game: these groups are laser-focused on defending the government school monopoly at all costs. They want to keep other people’s kids locked in their failure factories so they can siphon as much money as possible away from families and into the system.
Census Bureau numbers confirm just how much the tide is turning. Homeschooling enrollment has at least doubled since 2019, and the growth shows no signs of slowing. COVID laid bare the dysfunction in government schools, from useless remote learning to radical ideologies in the classroom, and parents decided they had seen enough.
Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, even wants to take things a step further by officially partnering her union with the World Economic Forum to shape a national curriculum. That’s the future they envision — handing control of education to elites in Davos instead of trusting parents.
Even if the evidence showed homeschooling only matching the factory-model school system on average, the state would still have no legitimate authority to interfere. Kids don’t belong to the government. The Supreme Court made that crystal clear back in 1925 with Pierce v. Society of Sisters, ruling that “the child is not the mere creature of the State.” Oregon had tried to force every child into public schools, but the justices struck it down and affirmed parents’ fundamental right to direct their children’s education.
The Court reinforced this principle in Meyer v. Nebraska in 1923, protecting parents’ liberty to direct their children’s education, including striking down laws that banned foreign language instruction in private schools. Then, in Wisconsin v. Yoder in 1972, the justices sided with Amish parents who wanted to pull their children from high school to preserve their faith and community way of life. These landmark decisions enshrine parental rights as bedrock constitutional protections that no bureaucrat can simply override.
The state has the burden of proof when it comes to intervening in family life. Parents shouldn’t be forced to prove their innocence upfront just to educate their own children at home. Government should only step in with clear evidence of real abuse, and even then, the intervention must be narrow and targeted.
Envision government officials sitting at every family’s dinner table each week, inspecting meals “just in case” some parents aren’t feeding their kids right. That scenario would represent an obvious violation of our Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches, and no one would stand for it. Yet that’s the invasive logic behind calls to regulate homeschooling as if every parent is a suspect.
History shows exactly where this path of centralized control leads. The Nazi regime banned homeschooling in 1938 with criminal penalties attached, all to create a monopoly on thought and ensure their authoritarian ideology took root in every young mind. America’s own compulsory government school system didn’t emerge from some noble tradition of freedom — it was imported from Prussia, modern-day Germany, and aggressively promoted here in Massachusetts by Horace Mann. The whole model was engineered to produce obedient soldiers and compliant factory workers, not independent thinkers who question authority.
Homeschoolers sidestep the school system’s ugliest realities altogether. They avoid the gangs, the drugs, the mindless conformity, the left-wing indoctrination, the social promotion, and the constant threat of violence that plague too many government institutions. An FBI report from 2025 documented 1.3 million crimes committed in schools over just a few recent years.
And let’s not forget the subject of The Atlantic’s own story. They concede that Stefan Merrill Block grew up to become a successful and educated author, complete with New York Times bestsellers to his name. Their highlighted “failure” case actually produced someone thriving in the real world. That undercuts the panic they’re trying to stoke.
Regulations have failed to fix the problems in public schools — they have often entrenched mediocrity and waste. Importing the same model into homeschooling would risk spreading those shortcomings rather than solving them. Many on the left are uncomfortable with the fact that they lack the same direct control over parents that they exercise over most school districts. That gap in authority has led some to push for sidelining families in favor of greater state oversight.
Parents know their children better than any distant bureaucrat ever could. Homeschooling delivers measurable results, saves taxpayers money, and upholds the core American value of freedom.
The Atlantic can publish as many cautionary stories as it likes, but the data, the Supreme Court precedents, and basic common sense remain firmly on the side of parental authority. It’s time to end the double standards and attack narratives and let families lead the way in educating the next generation.
Corey A. DeAngelis is an American advocate for school choice. This article was sourced HERE
Government schools deliver exactly the opposite outcome. In Chicago alone, there are 55 public schools where not a single kid tests proficient in math. They spend about $30,000 per student each year and still fail to produce basic proficiency. The Nation’s Report Card shows nearly 80 percent of US kids aren’t proficient in math. That’s the real crisis staring us in the face, and it demands accountability from the system that claims to serve our children.
The critics who demand tighter rules on homeschooling never mention these disasters in public education. They won’t even consider shutting down the failing public schools that waste billions of taxpayer dollars and fail thousands of kids every year. But when families opt out and choose something better for their kids? Suddenly it’s time for government oversight and heavy-handed regulations. This double standard exposes the true agenda at play.
Teachers’ unions watch the collapse of academic achievement and never push for less funding. Every bad score just becomes another excuse for more cash grabs from the public. If they really thought homeschool was underperforming, they’d be calling for gobs of taxpayer money to fix it.
This logical inconsistency gives away the game: these groups are laser-focused on defending the government school monopoly at all costs. They want to keep other people’s kids locked in their failure factories so they can siphon as much money as possible away from families and into the system.
Census Bureau numbers confirm just how much the tide is turning. Homeschooling enrollment has at least doubled since 2019, and the growth shows no signs of slowing. COVID laid bare the dysfunction in government schools, from useless remote learning to radical ideologies in the classroom, and parents decided they had seen enough.
Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, even wants to take things a step further by officially partnering her union with the World Economic Forum to shape a national curriculum. That’s the future they envision — handing control of education to elites in Davos instead of trusting parents.
Even if the evidence showed homeschooling only matching the factory-model school system on average, the state would still have no legitimate authority to interfere. Kids don’t belong to the government. The Supreme Court made that crystal clear back in 1925 with Pierce v. Society of Sisters, ruling that “the child is not the mere creature of the State.” Oregon had tried to force every child into public schools, but the justices struck it down and affirmed parents’ fundamental right to direct their children’s education.
The Court reinforced this principle in Meyer v. Nebraska in 1923, protecting parents’ liberty to direct their children’s education, including striking down laws that banned foreign language instruction in private schools. Then, in Wisconsin v. Yoder in 1972, the justices sided with Amish parents who wanted to pull their children from high school to preserve their faith and community way of life. These landmark decisions enshrine parental rights as bedrock constitutional protections that no bureaucrat can simply override.
The state has the burden of proof when it comes to intervening in family life. Parents shouldn’t be forced to prove their innocence upfront just to educate their own children at home. Government should only step in with clear evidence of real abuse, and even then, the intervention must be narrow and targeted.
Envision government officials sitting at every family’s dinner table each week, inspecting meals “just in case” some parents aren’t feeding their kids right. That scenario would represent an obvious violation of our Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches, and no one would stand for it. Yet that’s the invasive logic behind calls to regulate homeschooling as if every parent is a suspect.
History shows exactly where this path of centralized control leads. The Nazi regime banned homeschooling in 1938 with criminal penalties attached, all to create a monopoly on thought and ensure their authoritarian ideology took root in every young mind. America’s own compulsory government school system didn’t emerge from some noble tradition of freedom — it was imported from Prussia, modern-day Germany, and aggressively promoted here in Massachusetts by Horace Mann. The whole model was engineered to produce obedient soldiers and compliant factory workers, not independent thinkers who question authority.
Homeschoolers sidestep the school system’s ugliest realities altogether. They avoid the gangs, the drugs, the mindless conformity, the left-wing indoctrination, the social promotion, and the constant threat of violence that plague too many government institutions. An FBI report from 2025 documented 1.3 million crimes committed in schools over just a few recent years.
And let’s not forget the subject of The Atlantic’s own story. They concede that Stefan Merrill Block grew up to become a successful and educated author, complete with New York Times bestsellers to his name. Their highlighted “failure” case actually produced someone thriving in the real world. That undercuts the panic they’re trying to stoke.
Regulations have failed to fix the problems in public schools — they have often entrenched mediocrity and waste. Importing the same model into homeschooling would risk spreading those shortcomings rather than solving them. Many on the left are uncomfortable with the fact that they lack the same direct control over parents that they exercise over most school districts. That gap in authority has led some to push for sidelining families in favor of greater state oversight.
Parents know their children better than any distant bureaucrat ever could. Homeschooling delivers measurable results, saves taxpayers money, and upholds the core American value of freedom.
The Atlantic can publish as many cautionary stories as it likes, but the data, the Supreme Court precedents, and basic common sense remain firmly on the side of parental authority. It’s time to end the double standards and attack narratives and let families lead the way in educating the next generation.
Corey A. DeAngelis is an American advocate for school choice. This article was sourced HERE


10 comments:
Well, I don't necessarily disagree, but The Journal of School Choice? Not sure such a journal would have loads of articles saying choice is bad. It's like people criticizing articles for being woke in The Journal of Woke Studies. What is wrong with academia? Oh right, very very few have anything original to say ....
Sounds like New Zealand
Introduce a requirement for standards via AI such as Khan Academy which has 40 million students that are way above the average, then grow the space to.
Ah the Nazi party, didn’t take you long to roll that one out! Godwin wins before we even get to the comments section!
Home schooling at primary level may work OK - may work well, even - but runs into severe problems once we enter secondary and especially upper secondary. At secondary level, specialist teachers with degrees in content areas such as science, geography and history are supposed to be doing the teaching. Very, very few parents can boast a graduate background across the academic board. By the time we get to upper secondary level, we are dealing with very tough curricula in areas such as maths (inc. calculus in F7) and physical sciences (chemistry and physics). Teacher subject degrees at this stage become essential. And we also run into a need for specialist teaching facilities such as science labs. These cost money to build and operate, and trained operators.
I would argue that the duty of care of the State towards its younger members includes ensuring equality of opportunity. Home schooling deprives youngsters of secondary school age of many opportunities that their school-attending counterparts enjoy. A 17-year-old without a subject-competent chemistry (to use one example) teacher and access to a manned chem lab is being denied entry to numerous career-oriented pathways that demand high performance in chem. Hence I do not go along with the notion of home schooling beyond about age 10/11.
says a lot really that finding one homeschool kid that fell far behind makes a headline. Yet where are all the headlines on lack of literacy in so many school leavers, how normal it has become for university level entrants to be so far behind that universities have to teach catch-up basics before they can start the tertiary courses.
Most homeschooling I would guess, uses traditional methods of teaching which research shows overwhelmingly to be mosr effective for chidren's learning . Meanwhile our public schools are snared in progressive ideology which is not and never has been focused on academic achievement but instead social engineering- collectivism, socialising, socialism and other -isms including this century wokism. Parents want an effective education for their kids that prepares them for opportunities in a worthwhile career in life.This is not the aim of progressivism which primarily aims to produce a socialist society.
I believe NZ schools have been so taken over by leftist radicalism that they are unsafe places for children .
Secondary science education is an issue for an uneducated parent but those who write work books and other home based learning are usually master teachers who once again use traditional methods with structure making individual learning easy. Virtue science labs are being developed and actually have advantages over real labs, in being cheaper , more available anytime anywhere for remote and repeatable learning situations.
The private sector could well replace our schools function unless they change their radicalising ideology which so many parents just don't want.
I do think children need to learn to work with others but our schools need to improve discipline and reduce bullying as we also used to have in much traditional schooling.
Virtual labs? You can't speak of 'hands-on science' in that context. Students by Year 13 Chem are expected to be able to carry out a titration. That means handling a burette, pipette, standard solution, etc, not just pressing buttons on a keyboard.
Another of the Level 3 Chem standards has as its objective "Carry out an investigation in chemistry involving quantitative analysis." Again, this requires handling real equipment, not mucking around with a computer mouse.
It also underlines what I said above about the need for a real teacher with a real chemistry degree.
I feel very sorry for any 17-year-olds who have an interest in real science and want to develop that into a career-oriented tertiary science education programme. Assuming that s/he would get into a prep programme for biomedical or whatever field of science s/he is looking at, s/he will get the shock of his/her life when entering a real lab for the first time. I cannot help wondering whether at least some parents who home-school at that level actually intend to keep their sons and daughters out of varsity, perhaps out of varsity science. I reiterate my position that the State is failing in its duty of care in such instances.
I am a chemistry graduate , Barend and have no problem with sophisticated virtual labs . being a partial substitute for real labs, originating from gaming . Aircraft simulations are an example.
My dentist described how he practised certain dental procedures in his training in a virtual
way. Trainees were able to do procedures a multitude of times to get it perfected.
I found university staff were frequently poor at teaching well and you needed well explained other materials to help in explanations. Some people / teachers have a gift for lucid written explanations.
Of course I am not averse to real teachers in a classroom but just suggesting there are alternatives technology are developing. Gaynor
I have no problem with virtual labs as reinforcers and as ways to get through a series of expts quickly AFTER students have done the job using real equipment. Dentists and surgeons extend their basic training using virtual technology but this does not REPLACE hands-on with real gear.
Again, though, my focus shifts to who is in charge of these machinations. 99.9% of parents are not equipped to do so.
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.