Recent Gallup polling on Americans’ views of capitalism and socialism shows that just 54 percent now view capitalism favorably, the lowest Gallup has recorded. Views of socialism remain much lower at 39 percent, but the direction matters. Support for capitalism has fallen notably over time, especially among independents and younger Americans.
The partisan breakdown is even more revealing. Republicans remain strongly pro-capitalist, though support has softened slightly. Independents now only narrowly favor capitalism. And among Democrats, fewer than half view capitalism positively, while nearly two-thirds view socialism favorably. As earlier Gallup polling on capitalism and socialism shows, this pattern has been developing for years.
Here’s the hard truth: those of us who defend free-market capitalism are unlikely to persuade most Democrats anytime soon. The data confirm it. Democrats often like the outcomes of capitalism — jobs, innovation, higher living standards — but reject the label, associating it with inequality or corporate power.
That alone wouldn’t be alarming. Political disagreement is normal. What is alarming is where capitalism is losing ground next.
Here’s the hard truth: those of us who defend free-market capitalism are unlikely to persuade most Democrats anytime soon. The data confirm it. Democrats often like the outcomes of capitalism — jobs, innovation, higher living standards — but reject the label, associating it with inequality or corporate power.
That alone wouldn’t be alarming. Political disagreement is normal. What is alarming is where capitalism is losing ground next.
Click to view
A System of Liberty, Not Privilege
True capitalism is grounded in private property, competitive markets, voluntary exchange, and the rule of law. It treats individuals as decision-makers in their own lives — not subjects of top-down control. It decentralizes power, rewards value creation, and invites experimentation, allowing people to say “yes” to opportunity without asking permission from bureaucrats or politicians.
This idea is old — and proven. Adam Smith’s explanation of voluntary exchange captured it 250 years ago in The Wealth of Nations: “it is not from the benevolence of the butcher, brewer, or baker that we get our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.” In a system of voluntary exchange, people seeking to serve themselves must first serve others. Prices convey information, profits signal value creation, and losses expose waste — the core of the price mechanism in a free-market economy.
The process isn’t perfect, but it’s far superior to the alternatives. As Milton Friedman argued in his critique of big government, markets work because they respect people’s ability to decide, adapt, and improve through cooperation — not central command.
True capitalism is grounded in private property, competitive markets, voluntary exchange, and the rule of law. It treats individuals as decision-makers in their own lives — not subjects of top-down control. It decentralizes power, rewards value creation, and invites experimentation, allowing people to say “yes” to opportunity without asking permission from bureaucrats or politicians.
This idea is old — and proven. Adam Smith’s explanation of voluntary exchange captured it 250 years ago in The Wealth of Nations: “it is not from the benevolence of the butcher, brewer, or baker that we get our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.” In a system of voluntary exchange, people seeking to serve themselves must first serve others. Prices convey information, profits signal value creation, and losses expose waste — the core of the price mechanism in a free-market economy.
The process isn’t perfect, but it’s far superior to the alternatives. As Milton Friedman argued in his critique of big government, markets work because they respect people’s ability to decide, adapt, and improve through cooperation — not central command.
The Real Warning in the Gallup Data
The most troubling signal in the Gallup polling isn’t Democratic skepticism. It’s the erosion among independents and younger Americans — groups that historically decide elections and shape long-term political trends.
Independents still lean pro-capitalist, but their support has fallen. Younger Americans overwhelmingly support small business and free enterprise, yet are increasingly ambivalent toward “capitalism” as a system. That suggests confusion, not rejection.
Even more concerning is what’s happening on the right.
A growing faction of Republicans — often labeled “national conservatives” or “populists” — is openly abandoning free-market principles in favor of state-directed outcomes. They argue for industrial policy, trade protectionism, expanded subsidies, and heavier regulation, all justified as necessary to achieve cultural, national, or political goals.
This matters because it breaks the traditional coalition that defended markets across parties.
When Both Sides Drift Toward Bigger Government
Gallup’s data show Americans are overwhelmingly positive toward small business (95 percent) and free enterprise (81 percent), while holding deeply negative views of big business. That gap tells us people still believe in markets — but not in a system that feels rigged and political.
The left responds by calling for more government control. Some on the right now respond by calling for different forms of government control. The mechanism is the same.
Whether it’s progressive redistribution or nationalist industrial policy, the solution offered is top-down power — politicians picking outcomes, overriding prices, and directing capital. History shows this doesn’t fix capitalism’s problems; it replaces markets with politics.
As the fallacy of corporate subsidies makes clear, once the government starts steering the economy, competition weakens, insiders win, and ordinary people lose. Bigger government doesn’t become more precise — it becomes more entrenched — regardless of which party is in charge.
Capitalism’s Problem Is Not About Performance
The Gallup results don’t show a rejection of capitalism’s benefits. They show a rejection of cronyism mislabeled as capitalism. Americans like choice, competition, small businesses, innovation, and opportunity — all products of free-market capitalism.
What they don’t like are bailouts, favoritism, barriers to entry, and rules that protect the powerful — outcomes caused by policy distortions, not markets. Policies such as occupational licensing that create barriers to opportunity or housing restrictions raise costs and block entry, especially for younger Americans. When those failures are blamed on “capitalism,” skepticism grows.
This is why the fight matters most outside the Democratic base. If independents, young people, and market-friendly conservatives drift toward bigger government — just with different slogans — the long-run prospects for freedom dim.
The Moral Case — and the Evidence
Beyond efficiency, capitalism rests on a moral foundation. Markets respect individuals’ dignity to pursue their own conception of the good life. They reward service, not status. They generate progress through experimentation and feedback. And they decentralize power, protecting against tyranny.
The evidence is overwhelming. In 1820, more than 90 percent of the world lived in extreme poverty. Today, that figure is under 10 percent, as shown by data on extreme poverty over time. Life expectancy has doubled. Child mortality has collapsed. Access to goods and services, once considered luxuries, has become common.
What drove this transformation? Not redistribution or industrial planning. It was the spread of market institutions: open trade, secure property rights, sound money, and the freedom to invest and innovate. The comparisons are instructive — East v. West Germany, North v. South Korea, Venezuela v. Chile. Where markets are embraced, prosperity follows. Where they’re suppressed, poverty and repression prevail.
Click to view
Reclaiming Capitalism
The polling tells us the challenge ahead is not convincing Democrats who already favor more government. It is rebuilding confidence among the persuadable middle and preventing the right from abandoning markets in favor of control.
The path forward isn’t to redefine capitalism, but to reclaim it: restore sound money, limit government favoritism, secure property rights, open competition, and remove barriers that trap workers and families. And we must explain — not just defend — why free-market capitalism remains the best path to prosperity.
Public skepticism is rising, yet the moral and empirical case for capitalism has never been stronger.
Vance Ginn, PhD, is founder and president of Ginn Economic Consulting, LLC based near Austin, Texas, and an Associate Research Fellow with AIER. This article was sourced HERE
The polling tells us the challenge ahead is not convincing Democrats who already favor more government. It is rebuilding confidence among the persuadable middle and preventing the right from abandoning markets in favor of control.
The path forward isn’t to redefine capitalism, but to reclaim it: restore sound money, limit government favoritism, secure property rights, open competition, and remove barriers that trap workers and families. And we must explain — not just defend — why free-market capitalism remains the best path to prosperity.
Public skepticism is rising, yet the moral and empirical case for capitalism has never been stronger.
Vance Ginn, PhD, is founder and president of Ginn Economic Consulting, LLC based near Austin, Texas, and an Associate Research Fellow with AIER. This article was sourced HERE
7 comments:
Totally agree. The free market has done wonders here in NZ to bring us lower prices for power that have allowed both heavy industry and everyday consumers to flourish. Every PPP put in place has succeeded showing that the state and private sectors can work together for the good of all. The same can be said of deregulated sectors such as FMCG, where small scale suppliers are treated fairly even where there is an imbalance of negotiating power with the companies they supply to, and the consumer is winning with cheaper and cheaper end-user prices. And let’s look at insurance and reinsurance, where the whole of our small country is covered at a fair rate. A bright future indeed.
Looking further afield, America is doing wonderfully. There is fantastic competition in the media industries, streaming for example is providing consumers with choice that they haven’t seen since the days of terrestrial television. And the shift to private provision of user-pays healthcare has lifted standards for all at the lowest prices America has ever seen. The envy of nations.
And then there is the tech sector. Deregulation has done wonders to level the playing field and there are hundreds of quality products available in many markets. From office productivity, to social networking, to search - innovation is here and employees who contribute are rewarded with job stability while the hundreds and hundreds of tech companies who employ them turn a fair profit. Trust really is paying off and anyone speaking out against this needs their head read.
While the corrupt MSM has freedom to indoctrinate a gullible public with its propaganda the slide will continue.
You have more than me; you should not. Don't tell me you worked for it and saved; that's bs. Angry envy. And with more and more people believing they are shut out of buying a house by prices or ''victims'' of this or that, the anti-capitalist beliefs will grow. If I am always going to have to rent and have relatively little I will not try harder , I will blame and back all wealth, asset, gains, property and other taxes and so forth. Nothing to lose so up you. That theme seems prevalent.
The young ones see the corruption of free markets and reject free markets. If corporations were outlawed (they even have the legal status of private individuals in USA) most of our big marketing problems would disappear. If financial institutions were regulated properly that would level the playing field. The rich can't keep getting richer off poor men's labour.
Who cares what “young people” think. Due to the population bust their number is diminishing by the day. Old people rule the world, it was, is and will ever be the case. Yay!
Hardly surprising Americans hold deeply negative views on big business. In my working life the corporates in this country continually restructured and imposed redundancies (and we tend to follow American business theory and practices). Staff were like inanimate pieces in a kaleidoscope puzzle. Senior management would shift them into new patterns at will. They’re still at it, only now they call it “right-sizing”. Customer service was heralded as all important, but then farmed out to call centres, many of them based overseas, the operators disempowered and hard to understand. Today the corporates are shuffling their “valued customers” off to chatbots just as fast as they can. Why on earth would any one hold positive views on big business? Staff and customers are not treated at all well while exec salaries and board fees rise noticeably faster than the average. And I’m actually pro-business, but I also know what I’ve experienced and seen, as an employee, a customer and as a shareholder too. There are good big companies out there, but there are also far too many for whom such negative sentiment is well deserved. They give capitalism a bad name.
Big business has never been better for the consumer. There are countless examples: look at what has happened to YouTube since Google acquired it, there is now more choice among video streamers, the YouTube application itself has improved, better search outcomes, fewer ads, better choice, no interruptions while viewing. All for the better.
The same happened in NZ with groceries. Since Foodtown and Big Fresh were acquired by larger competitors, competition has gone through the roof and the consumer is winning at every turn. And look at Mighty Ape: since they were acquired by Kogan, their website has gotten better, customer service has improved, their reputation among customer has never been better, all the while profits are going up.
More large companies should acquire other companies, it is just common sense.
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.