Which is fair enough in some ways, it was a shoddy process. The MPs say it offends the rule of law and they’re probably right.
It was done in a hurry to save last year’s Budget, rushed through under urgency and changed the rules retrospectively. It’s all really cynical stuff from a Government and too much of that sort of behaviour undermines confidence in the way the system works.
But even though they make some fair points and mount some fair criticism of the way Nicola Willis and Brooke van Velden ran this thing out, I can’t get past the next question I have, which is: so what?
What do these former MPs think will happen as a result of this report? The pay equity scheme is not going to be brought back in the form it previously existed. It’s far too expensive.
The cost to the Government was estimated at $13 billion over four years. The cost to the entire economy would have been much, much higher.
The former MPs want political parties to make it a bottom line to reintroduce the scheme after the election. No party can credibly commit to that.
Where would they find $13 billion, other than by making the country’s already worrying structural deficit even worse and adding to our already far-too-large debt?
Chippy will make noises about bringing it back, but press him a little harder - ask him where he’s going to find the money - and you don’t get any sufficient answers.
Ultimately, that’s where the argument ends - where do you find the money?
Yes, it was bad lawmaking. Yes, people were hurt by it. Yes, it’s fair to criticise. But where do you get the money?
Heather du Plessis-Allan is a journalist and commentator who hosts Newstalk ZB's Drive show. This article was sourced from Newstalk ZB.
5 comments:
Chippy will probably just print more money and borrow more, then give a further $13 billion to the Maori elite, and after that make scapegoats of the "greedy" farmers and businesses.
The Pay Equity issue was a financial landmine the last government left (one of many) and continues to provide problems. This issue is nothing more than Unions lamenting their lack of power / membership, so are trying to recreate collective bargaining by a political pressure campaign.
The whole pay equity question is a nonsense.
Illogical and irrational .
who were on the panel that will tell you the motive.
Apart from the financial threat, it reduces the whole question of pay rates to a speech competition. What is or is not comparable depends primarily on the speech ability of the representative protaganists
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.