Some New Zealand schoolchildren can recite Gallipoli like scripture. They can tell you about the cliffs, the trenches, the futility, the sacrifice, the mythology. What they cannot tell you, because the curriculum barely mentions it, is that our most consistently successful soldiers of the First World War weren’t on the Dardanelles at all.
They were on horseback in the Sinai, Palestine, and the Jordan Valley.
They were the New Zealand Mounted Rifles, and they were feared by the Ottomans for good reason.
But in the modern retelling of our national story, they have been quietly filed under “miscellaneous”.
But in the modern retelling of our national story, they have been quietly filed under “miscellaneous”.
The Campaigns We Don’t Teach
The Mounted Rifles fought in a theatre that doesn’t fit the tidy Gallipoli narrative of noble failure. They fought in a theatre where New Zealanders were not victims of circumstance but professionals, executing complex operations in extreme conditions — and winning.
Sinai: Turning Back an Empire
In 1916, the Ottoman Empire attempted to strike the Suez Canal. The Mounted Rifles helped stop them cold. Long-range patrols, desert marches, and mobile engagements broke the Ottoman advance and secured the canal — a strategic victory of global significance.
Beersheba: The Key to the Charge
Everyone knows the Australian Light Horse’s famous charge at Beersheba. Almost nobody knows that the New Zealanders seized Tel el Saba, the fortified high ground dominating the battlefield. Without that, the charge would have been suicidal. With it, the Ottoman line collapsed.
Palestine & Jordan: Relentless Pursuit
From the Jordan Valley to the hills of Palestine, the Mounted Rifles excelled in:
- night marches
- river crossings under fire
- rapid exploitation
- pursuit operations that shattered Ottoman cohesion
The Ottomans feared them because they had earned that fear.
Why They’re Missing From the Curriculum
The answer is simple in my opinion: the Mounted Rifles don’t fit the modern ideological template.
The curriculum prefers:
- tragedy over competence
- victimhood over professionalism
- Gallipoli-as-myth over Middle East-as-history
The Mounted Rifles represent something unfashionable: New Zealanders who were not just brave, but effective. They fought, manoeuvred, adapted, and won.
And that is precisely why they are forgotten.
A Personal Footnote to a National Blind Spot
One of my own relatives rode with the Mounted Rifles. He was first listed as Missing in Action, the kind of message that must have frozen every household that received it and later confirmed killed. His service, like that of thousands of others in the desert campaigns, is now largely invisible in our national story. The curriculum has room for Gallipoli, but not for him.
This is not remembrance. It is selective memory.
The Cost of Forgetting
When a nation forgets its victories and fixates on its defeats, it tells you something about the nation — not the history.
We have built an ANZAC mythology that centres on:
- futility
- tragedy
- victimhood
- and the emotional comfort of a story where nobody is to blame and nothing could have been done differently
- competent
- disciplined
- strategically significant
- and capable of shaping events rather than being shaped by them
If ANZAC Day Means Anything, It Must Include Them
If ANZAC Day is about remembering, then we should remember all of it:
- the defeats
- the disasters
- the courage
- the professionalism
- and the victories
The New Zealand Mounted Rifles were among the most effective Allied forces in the Middle East. They earned their place in our national memory. It’s time the curriculum caught up.
Because a country that forgets its best soldiers is a country that no longer understands itself.

3 comments:
Colinxy doesn’t mention the infamous massacre of civilians carried out by this “Anzac Elite” at Surafend in December 1918, which led British general Allenby to say to them: “There was a time when I was proud of you men of the Anzac Mounted Division. I am proud of you no longer. Today, I think you are nothing but a lot of cowards and murderers.”
Was Allenby too harsh in this judgment? A good place to begin to answer this question is the book “Devils on Horseback”, which provides a more balanced account of the Anzac Mounted Rifles than Colinxy’s hagiography.
You are absolutely right to recall and reflect on Kiwi and ANZAC action in Palestine and Mesopotamia.
In recent times, I have commented on the areas being shown in Gaza and to the north where our rifle men and horse men were in action .
How many of the current generation know that the ANZACs were in action at the Rafah Crossing on 9 January 1917, when the New Zealand Mounted Rifles participated in the final battle of the Sinai Campaign on the borders of Palestine ?
My great uncle was part of the Dunsterforce that rode from Bagdhad to Baku in 1918 on horseback - there was a total of
350 Australian, New Zealand, British and Canadian officers and NCOs. But few of us are even aware of this.
Nor are many aware that most of the NZ Army was rest and recreation in Syria in WW2 when they were urgently called to the Libyan front line.
Nor about the NZ Railway Operating Companies that build railways under fire in both WW1 and WW2 ?
There are so many campaigns that Kiwis have taken lead roles in, while sadly Gallipoli is the main focus today.
Our military history is well recorded, if people bother to research it.
Lest we forget.
Should ave mentioned in earlier comment the the book “Devils on Horseback “ is by military historian Terry Kinloch
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.