Pages

Thursday, April 30, 2026

Perspective with Heather du Plessis-Allan: TVNZ crossed a line with their handling of Maiki Sherman


From the commentary I’m seeing online, it’s clear there is a perception that no one reported on the Maiki Sherman revelation because the media were protecting one of their own.

I can tell you that perception is true. It’s not imagined - it is true.

It is not true for Newstalk ZB. And I’m not saying that because I’m employed by Newstalk ZB; I’m saying it because I was involved in some of the phone calls around this particular - shall we loosely call it - investigation. I know we tried to publish this but we ran into a couple of obstacles, which, frankly, happens with investigations. There’s no need to get too dramatic about it.

I can’t tell you the number of things I’ve wanted to report on, or tried to report on, that I’ve never been able to. There’s a long list.

I also don’t think the press gallery members who were at the party in Nicola Willis’ office last May can necessarily be judged for not reporting on what happened.

As I said yesterday on the show, I worked in the press gallery too. I know there’s a lot of boozing in the press gallery - I did it myself - and sometimes there’s bad behaviour because that’s what happens with booze.

It doesn’t always get reported. Do you narc on all your mates every time you’re out drinking and they do something stupid? No, you don’t.

What was not okay, however, was that when it became known in Wellington that Newstalk ZB was trying to run a story, members of the press gallery got in touch to raise concerns.

My recollection is that they were worried that if we went public with what Maiki Sherman said to Lloyd Burr, we would be breaking a long-held convention of not reporting on what happens during “drinky poos” in Parliament.

They feared ministers would then panic about breaches of Chatham House rules and stop inviting the press gallery into their offices for drinks.

That crossed the line, in my opinion. That was actively trying to stop media outside Wellington from reporting on what happened in Wellington, involving one of their own.

In the end, it didn’t influence us at all. And I’m not telling you this because it does me any favours - it doesn’t. I expect I’ll be ostracised the next time I see some of my friends in the press gallery for saying this.

But I think it’s worth saying because it’s a reminder to all of us in the media that our job is to report the facts, not to suppress them - even when it involves our mates.

Heather du Plessis-Allan is a journalist and commentator who hosts Newstalk ZB's Drive show.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

I can’t tell you the number of things I’ve wanted to report on, or tried to report on, that I’ve never been able to”

Well duh, that’s because you’re not a journalist? You’re a rented opinion giver. If we want news, we go to news outlets.

Anonymous said...

When media deem within their circle jerk what is and isn't public interest, they become not arbiters of truth (or 'news') but censors. This is why only 32% of New Zealanders now trust them and I use the word trust with caution...

Robert MacCulloch said...

Let's not mince words. NZ's political, legal & media "establishment" has turned nasty and vindictive. Free speech is gone. Forthright commentary as folks like me and Mike Reddell did has been met with revolting baseless legal defamation threats designed to frighten us off. Our sick legal profession has jumped right in. More fees for them. I had to close my popular Blog because of it. I just read an over the top email coming from the RBNZ which threatened a prominent economist for taking a different view from the Bank's on monetary policy, saying they would out him for deliberately misleading the public. He voiced a valid opinion in the Herald, one I agree with. I did a TVNZ interview last year that got removed after a call to them from Luxon's office. NZ has become an ugly place where comms, PR and whitewashes rule. Most people are not aware of what's been happening. ZB are part of this disgraceful show so not sure what Du Plessis is on about.

Allen Heath said...

It's Chatham House Rule; there is only one, it was never plural.

Anonymous said...

Who knows how many times the media has crossed the line? One thing I am curious about - did Newstalk ZB tried to run a story before Ani OB’s Substack publication or after it?!

Hugh Jorgan said...

Bollocks. NZME/Newstalk ZB backed down in the face of a threatened lawsuit from TVNZ. If you knew for a fact that the abuse occurred, you should have gone ahead and reported anyway, and defended the lawsuit. Cowards.

Anonymous said...

Heather - "me thinks" that when people read this article, you will come the target for some rather insidious comments - most will be aimed at the "we investigated, but did nothing".
Odd on this platform, Ani O'Brien, in her article (which literally set the NZ MSM in a spin) on this subject stated -
- she is always the target of many within NZ MSM
- she presented, to the best of her knowledge, information relating to this story
- she indicated that NZ MSM "already knew" what had taken place but decided to "bury it".
Interestingly Duncan Garner, in his podcast, which can be viewed via You Tube (to which he attracts many Kiwi viewers) - covered this story in the light -
- he was the "target of NZ MSM (NZ Herald in particular) over recent person events and also one that (allegedly) involved Barry Soper
- that the story of Maiki Sherman seemed to get "kid gloves" attention.
Keep in mind Mr Garner has also worked in MSM, all be it, he has a reputation that for some is "not their cup of tea".
Sorry HdA - but The NZ Public have just added another reason, to their already increasing list - "Of why we, The People" of NZ, no longer have faith in our Media.
To add to that, we can "thank" Jacinda Ardern, if not her then those who worked alongside her for the financial investment to NZ MSM - along with the obligatory requirements that came with the money.
It was a step, mostly missed by the people, being taken by Socialist endeavor to begin control of the media and what they presented as "news" to the people.
"We are the Podium of Truth".
Very much like Canada has been doing, since Justin Trudeau.

Chuck Bird said...

The taxpayer should not fund the booze, especially when some people are having more to drink than they should.

Anonymous said...

I have to agree with Hugh on this. Shame on you lot Heather. You are normally a leading light , far better than the despicable left lot for balance, but you failed the good people. This does your credibility no good at all.

Alen said...

At at every place that I've worked, drinking at work is a serious disciplinary matter.

Post a Comment

Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.