Both display a damn creepy organising principle steeped in the rejection of Western liberty, Judeo-Christian understandings of human nature, and the fundamental dignity of the person.
This unholy marriage shows itself with gruesome clarity in violence and mutilation to the human body.
The atrocities of October 7th, 2023, perpetrated by Gazans enthral to Hamas and its allies, featured systematic sexual violence - rape, gang rape, genital mutilation including the severing of breasts and even necrophilia. These acts of sadistic barbarism are sickening to read or even know about, but this is their level of crazed savagery, making the child-sacrificing Amalekites of old sound warm and cuddly.
A leading feminist philosopher, queer theorist and critical theorist Judith Butler stated on a panel in Paris, March 2024:
“We can have different views about armed resistance, but I think it is more honest and historically correct to say that the uprising of October 7 was an act of armed resistance. It is not a terrorist attack and it’s not an antisemitic attack.”
Butler considers Hamas and Hezbollah to be a part of the global left social movements, reclassifying their eye-watering barbarism as “armed resistance” against the violence of the Israeli state apparatus; thus she subordinates well-documented inhumanity to an ideological narrative. What a twisted devil.
Similarly, the woke commitment to gender theory, also a pet topic of the remarkably asexual-looking Butler, which as we know institutionalised surgical and chemical mutilations upon our young: puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, mastectomies and attempts at genital reconstruction. As medical authorities such as the Cass Review finally scrutinised, showing irreversible harms that ought to have been self evident: sterility, sexual dysfunction and enormous regret, this freakish trend represents postmodern bodily desecration writ large. Like the Islamic preoccupation with genital cutting and sexual sadism, they subordinate biologically inhumane practices to an ideological narrative. If Judith Butler counts today as a ‘philosopher,’ then the Marquis de Sade was a Puritan.
By way of contrast to this ghastly spectre of Islamo-marxism stands Trump. Morally intact and diplomatically gifted - he has shown himself as the “stable genius” he always claimed to be. From a position of extraordinary strength, he directly engages with Chi-com leadership while drawing enormous respect, and at the very same time applies strategic pressure on the Iranian regime, a position radically grounded in national interest rather than the ideological witch’s brew of his vapid predecessors.
History exclaims a clear warning: the ’79 Iranian Revolution saw the Islamists swiftly eliminate their Marxist allies after consolidating power; the secularism of Marxists was a natural threat to theocratic rule. It remains unfathomable that over-educated kooks like Butler don’t absorb these facts after spending their lives in American universities infecting the minds of the young.
The Red-Green alliance assaults the foundational principles of human dignity, reason and bodily integrity. Those committed to the preservation of our civilisation must respond with intellectual clarity and moral resolve, defending the sanctity of the individual against all ideologies that treat the body as raw material for dystopian ends.
The atrocities of October 7th, 2023, perpetrated by Gazans enthral to Hamas and its allies, featured systematic sexual violence - rape, gang rape, genital mutilation including the severing of breasts and even necrophilia. These acts of sadistic barbarism are sickening to read or even know about, but this is their level of crazed savagery, making the child-sacrificing Amalekites of old sound warm and cuddly.
A leading feminist philosopher, queer theorist and critical theorist Judith Butler stated on a panel in Paris, March 2024:
“We can have different views about armed resistance, but I think it is more honest and historically correct to say that the uprising of October 7 was an act of armed resistance. It is not a terrorist attack and it’s not an antisemitic attack.”
Butler considers Hamas and Hezbollah to be a part of the global left social movements, reclassifying their eye-watering barbarism as “armed resistance” against the violence of the Israeli state apparatus; thus she subordinates well-documented inhumanity to an ideological narrative. What a twisted devil.
Similarly, the woke commitment to gender theory, also a pet topic of the remarkably asexual-looking Butler, which as we know institutionalised surgical and chemical mutilations upon our young: puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, mastectomies and attempts at genital reconstruction. As medical authorities such as the Cass Review finally scrutinised, showing irreversible harms that ought to have been self evident: sterility, sexual dysfunction and enormous regret, this freakish trend represents postmodern bodily desecration writ large. Like the Islamic preoccupation with genital cutting and sexual sadism, they subordinate biologically inhumane practices to an ideological narrative. If Judith Butler counts today as a ‘philosopher,’ then the Marquis de Sade was a Puritan.
By way of contrast to this ghastly spectre of Islamo-marxism stands Trump. Morally intact and diplomatically gifted - he has shown himself as the “stable genius” he always claimed to be. From a position of extraordinary strength, he directly engages with Chi-com leadership while drawing enormous respect, and at the very same time applies strategic pressure on the Iranian regime, a position radically grounded in national interest rather than the ideological witch’s brew of his vapid predecessors.
History exclaims a clear warning: the ’79 Iranian Revolution saw the Islamists swiftly eliminate their Marxist allies after consolidating power; the secularism of Marxists was a natural threat to theocratic rule. It remains unfathomable that over-educated kooks like Butler don’t absorb these facts after spending their lives in American universities infecting the minds of the young.
The Red-Green alliance assaults the foundational principles of human dignity, reason and bodily integrity. Those committed to the preservation of our civilisation must respond with intellectual clarity and moral resolve, defending the sanctity of the individual against all ideologies that treat the body as raw material for dystopian ends.
Olivia is a NZ blogger, author and essayist who likes to write about history and its wide influence on our present time. This article was sourced HERE
7 comments:
There is no such thing as "Judeo-Christianity". There is (Talmudic) Judaism and there is Christianity. Indeed, Judaism is more ideologically aligned in structure to Islam that to Christianity.
But perhaps you refer to the small sect of Jews who still believe the old testament. The Karaite Jews are a small minority and are ostracised by Rabbinic Judaism. It is hard to believe that they have any influence on Israeli policy or actions.
I don't like the actions of Hamas nor of those who mutilate themselves in the name of gender nor of Israel in Gaza and other places.
As Paul writes quoting the old testament "There is none righteous, no, not one:" Rom 3:10
Trump "diplomatically gifted"? He is anything but diplomatic š
She talks about the "undying love-affair between Islam and Marxism" and then later claims, in relation to the Iranian revolution of 1979, that "the Islamists swiftly eliminate[d] their Marxist allies ... the secularism of Marxists was a natural threat to theocratic rule." Mutual tolerance between Marxism and Islam is hard enough to find, let alone any love affair between them.
She implies agreement with the assertion that "Hamas and Hezbollah [are] a part of the global left social movements". Really? Sharia law is remarkably 'conservative' when it comes to moral and social issues. Try selling the gender-bender ideology to Muslims and see what happens.
A "Red-Green alliance" is an illusion created by Western commentators. These naive ideologues may think they are applying the principle of "my enemy's enemy is my friend" but that "enemy's enemy" certainly doesn't when it comes to them.
So it’s not true that the Islamists allied with the Marxists to get rid of the Shah?
Anon 1020, this is like saying that the Communists allied with the French Resistance to get rid of the occupying power (Germans) in WW2. They shared the same immediate goal but their plans for what happened afterwards were so different that any mention of an 'alliance' seems inappropriate.
What Barend says about the French aligning with the Communists against the Nazi's illustrates exactly with what has happened with the Arabs in the Middle East. Allegiances change but the ideologies can remain partially or fully intact.
The father of Palestinian nationalism Al Hussein fled to Nazi Germany since the Nazis were the only power to cooperate in the extermination of the Jewish presence in the Middle East .
End of that liaison after WW2, however the Soviets , sought leveredage in the Middle East . Israel aligned with the West. The Arabs World was seen by the Soviets as a raw material for their proxies against the West. Marxist ideas of oppression ,liberation, Colonisation, self- determination replaced race and genocide . These communist ideas were introduced to the Arabs through Yasser Arafat . This was well documented by Ion Pacepa , a high ranking Soviet operative who defected ( read about him on Wikipaedia etc). He described how the KGB crafted the Palestinian narrative .
By the 1970s the Palestinian cause had become a flagship of the global left. Western Universities , newsrooms and parliaments already seeped in Marxism absorbed the familiar rhetoric . The Soviets are not there now in Islam but their heritage lives on in their proxies against the West.
You put it well, Anon 157. I will concede that the Palestinian cause is certainly one consistent with the neo-Marxist paradigm of oppressor/oppressed. But the rest of the ideological baggage does not sit comfortably with Muslims and the woke stuff most certainly does not.
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.