The foreign aid budget, from what I understand, is worth about $1 billion, or roughly $88 for each New Zealander over four years. National wants to redirect about $17 of that $88 a person over the same period and keep it here in New Zealand to help pay for medicines.
The rest would still go towards foreign aid, and assistance to the Pacific would remain untouched, which you would have to say is appropriate given China's growing interest in the region and New Zealand's frontline role in maintaining stability and limiting Chinese military influence and basing opportunities in the Pacific.
There may well be good reasons for some of this spending but I think there is much less justification for several of the examples National highlighted.
There is arguably much less value in New Zealand funding smart agricultural systems in Latin America, workshops with Indigenous farmers in Patagonia, or livestock emissions research equipment at universities in South Africa. South Africa is literally on the other side of the world from us.
For many New Zealanders, the rationale for spending money there is difficult to see. If there is a compelling reason, it is sufficiently removed from most people's daily lives that it creates a strong political argument, at least, for what National is proposing.
We all know New Zealand does not spend enough on medicines. For every medicine publicly funded here, Australia finances around 2.5. We are significantly behind our neighbours across the Tasman.
I ran into a woman I know at the weekend who has multiple sclerosis and cannot access the medication she would like funded in New Zealand. To get it, she would have to go to the United States.
Many people pay for health insurance for exactly this reason. It is not necessarily because they want coverage for elective surgery; it is because they want the reassurance that, if they develop breast cancer or another serious illness, they can access medicines that are available elsewhere in the developed world but are not publicly funded here.
That is, frankly, disgraceful. Pharmac's budget needs to increase.
Now, Winston Peters can obviously see some logic in maintaining this spending that the rest of us may not see. But, on the face of it, it looks as though, if National is re-elected, some money being spent on projects overseas could be brought back home and used to help save lives here in New Zealand.
Heather du Plessis-Allan is a journalist and radio broadcaster who hosts Newstalk ZB's weekday Drive-Time Show – where this article was sourced.

3 comments:
I would agree on most aspects of this article.
The one point I would firmly agree on is, we need to "Stop" funding anything overseas as it is not in our interests, nor does it supply an idea, concept, formula or end result toward our production systems.
Keep in mind this Country has complied with requirements of overseas Nations when exporting our product to them, but we seem to fail in placing those obstacles in front to them
One area I would like to see 'lose funding' is our nearest & dearest Pacific Island Nations, Fiji being a good, current example of ineptitude with regards to the management of a current epidemic - HIV - sadly aided by Native reluctance (& Govt lack of trying) to accept medicine.
Tonga would be next.
The next India, why spend money there, when it will not benefit NZ.
Sadly for WP, he needs The Jones Boy, to sit him down and talk about 'retiring'., when he does, take Jonesy with him.
As an aside, it would also be a little more acceptable and appropriate if those recognised but unfunded medications didn't additionally incur an element of 'insult to injury' in the form of our Govt slapping GST on top of their already expensive cost. The excuse that they don't want to "mess with GST" is just an excuse - and a feeble one at that. Charge the GST if they must, but provide and avenue for a subsidy or refund equivalent to the GST on those drugs recognised by Pharmac as appropriate for the verified condition being treated. How hard could that be? But, no. Leave those unfortunate enough to get those conditions that are bereft of Govt funded meds to effectively also subsidize those that do. What a wonderfully equitable system we embrace.
Directing more money towards pharmaceutical companies is not a sensible choice. So many of their products are a total waste of money and do more harm to people than good. New Zealand has become dependent upon pills and it isn't for the good of our health. We need to stop feeding the monster and focus on healthy habits and nutrition instead.
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.