On a recent Monday morning, my wife and I had breakfast at Bordeaux Bakery on Thorndon Quay, Wellington. I expressed surprise that the place was empty. A couple of years ago it would have been humming.We sat by the window with a view over the street. What we saw was a forest of traffic cones and red-and-white posts designating the cycle lanes that have spread like a cancer all over the city (a city, it should be noted, whose topography makes it singularly unsuited to cycling because many of its main thoroughfares are narrow and winding).
Cyclists rode past in dribs and drabs on their way to work but there were no cars outside because there were no parking spaces. One guy took his chances, stopping illegally for a few minutes while he came in for a takeaway coffee. Other than that, it was just my wife and me.
I felt sorry for the staff. Working in a business with no customers must be demoralising.
It was no surprise, then, to read the depressing announcement only days later that the three Bordeaux cafés around the city were closing, causing the loss of 40 jobs. The owner of the company was blunt about the primary reason: “Everyone keeps telling us how hard it is to get to us,” he told the NZ Herald.
And so continues the slow, torturous death of a city that 20 years ago was buzzing with vitality, ideas and promise. Wellington today is a hostile, alien environment, unfriendly and often bewildering even to its own residents, to say nothing of hapless outsiders trying to navigate streets that resemble obstacle courses. I spent most of my working life in Wellington but sometimes barely recognise the moribund city it has become.
Who’s to blame? The decay began in 2010 when Wellington voted out the last in a long run of capable mayors and perversely allowed itself to be persuaded its future lay with a Greenie blow-in from Britain. Three more useless mayors and Left-dominated councils later, the city has become so terminally dysfunctional that government intervention looks both likely and necessary.
But while it’s easy to pin the blame on ideologically driven zealots at the council table and the tone-deaf, unelected commissars and planners who really run the show, not to mention their media enablers (the Dom Post, under a former editor, harangued its readers almost daily with lectures on the virtues of cycling), it has to be said that the citizens and voters of Wellington can’t entirely escape responsibility.
It’s an old cliché that people get the governments they deserve and the same can be said of councils. New Zealanders en masse tend to be passive, complacent and apathetic. The late Gordon McLauchlan, in his book The Passionless People, called us smiling zombies. We gormlessly stand by while stupid and dangerous things happen, then shriek with indignation when the damage has been done.
We’re all familiar with the parable about the frogs in a pot of water that heats so gradually they don’t realise they’re being cooked alive. By the time the temperature reaches boiling point, it’s too late to reverse the process. The scientific veracity of the analogy has been challenged but it’s apt nonetheless. The city's steady decline, so obvious to occasional visitors, may not seem so apparent to the people who actually live there.
In this case, the frogs are the people of Wellington who allowed a clique of barmy activists to take over their once-proud city. My good friend Neil Harrap points out in a letter in The Post today that Wellingtonians who voted in the last local government elections were far outnumbered by those who couldn’t be bothered. There’s the problem, right there.
I felt sorry for the staff. Working in a business with no customers must be demoralising.
It was no surprise, then, to read the depressing announcement only days later that the three Bordeaux cafés around the city were closing, causing the loss of 40 jobs. The owner of the company was blunt about the primary reason: “Everyone keeps telling us how hard it is to get to us,” he told the NZ Herald.
And so continues the slow, torturous death of a city that 20 years ago was buzzing with vitality, ideas and promise. Wellington today is a hostile, alien environment, unfriendly and often bewildering even to its own residents, to say nothing of hapless outsiders trying to navigate streets that resemble obstacle courses. I spent most of my working life in Wellington but sometimes barely recognise the moribund city it has become.
Who’s to blame? The decay began in 2010 when Wellington voted out the last in a long run of capable mayors and perversely allowed itself to be persuaded its future lay with a Greenie blow-in from Britain. Three more useless mayors and Left-dominated councils later, the city has become so terminally dysfunctional that government intervention looks both likely and necessary.
But while it’s easy to pin the blame on ideologically driven zealots at the council table and the tone-deaf, unelected commissars and planners who really run the show, not to mention their media enablers (the Dom Post, under a former editor, harangued its readers almost daily with lectures on the virtues of cycling), it has to be said that the citizens and voters of Wellington can’t entirely escape responsibility.
It’s an old cliché that people get the governments they deserve and the same can be said of councils. New Zealanders en masse tend to be passive, complacent and apathetic. The late Gordon McLauchlan, in his book The Passionless People, called us smiling zombies. We gormlessly stand by while stupid and dangerous things happen, then shriek with indignation when the damage has been done.
We’re all familiar with the parable about the frogs in a pot of water that heats so gradually they don’t realise they’re being cooked alive. By the time the temperature reaches boiling point, it’s too late to reverse the process. The scientific veracity of the analogy has been challenged but it’s apt nonetheless. The city's steady decline, so obvious to occasional visitors, may not seem so apparent to the people who actually live there.
In this case, the frogs are the people of Wellington who allowed a clique of barmy activists to take over their once-proud city. My good friend Neil Harrap points out in a letter in The Post today that Wellingtonians who voted in the last local government elections were far outnumbered by those who couldn’t be bothered. There’s the problem, right there.
Karl du Fresne, a freelance journalist, is the former editor of The Dominion newspaper. His blog can be found at karldufresne.blogspot.co.nz.
10 comments:
Karl, I really enjoy having you back. I lived in wgtn during it's heyday ( 80's until 2020. I loved it, but not enough to stay. We are so glad to have left to a better part of the country (we are tempted to leave the country but are confident this govt will sort the mess out) .
You last 2 sentences are interesting, we need to get those that can't be bothered into voting, else you can't really complain. If the ones that can't be bothered voting did vote and the current disaster of a mayor won, then that is a problem. Unfortunately we get what we deserve and wellington is reaping the benefits of their actions.
As a positive person, I'm going to put a positive slant on the wgtn mess, at least the hundreds of millions of taxpayers money put into the cycle ways will be enjoyed by a handful of chuffed cyclists, including the few that you saw.
Brilliant
Karl - can I pick up on your comment - "perversely allowed itself to be persuaded its future lay with a Greenie blow-in from Britain"- in that "is it possible" that people like this come to NZ, supposedly seeking a better life, but also bring with them Left wing, socialist mentality learnt whilst growing up in what has been, for years, a socialist Country - known as Great Britain.
If one looks at that Country, now, one will see the advance decay of Cities, many have had and still have Socialist Councilor's that seem to dominate, and do not seem to have had any notion of management. Such inactivity, has led to the influx of People from Middle Eastern Countries, Pakistan and Northern African Countries that have "moved in and taken over".
If you think Wellington is "unique with current traffic management"- than one can also look at London and what the Mayor/Sadiq Khan has done their - actions more to curb traffic than manage it.
As I have said before:-
I agree completely Karl. I lived/worked in Wellington for more than twenty years, left in 2001. Your descriptions are just so accurate. Sadly,. the once proud characterful city is now a gloomy, grubby and dismal shadow if itself. And don't start me on the ***ing cycle ways !!
"Karl, I really enjoy having you back. "
Well Said, Anon, I agree 100%
If people want to save their city they have to become more cynical and astute; be aware socialism has no intent at all of improving people's lives . It is about promoting itself and its ideology. The ideology of supposedly saving the planet with cycle-ways is obviously more important than people's real needs. There is a steely dedication to this subversive agenda.
Socialism is hostile to Western Civilization and all its aspects and is clearly determined to undermine it. Businesses are obviously of little importance cf with cycle-ways . This makes no sense at all but then nothing makes sense or ever works with socialism in any area of endeavour. It is always a failure.
Terrible loss about the Bordeaux Bakeries, in our hay day we'd park there and grab some loaves and patisserie from the boulangerie, lol. It was better times. The city was vibrant and there were things to do. We lived in the CBD. It was the 90's.
Upon Arrival in Wgtn in the 90's, it was just me and my mountain bike. It was fit for purpose. Plenty of hills and narrow and winding streets but then I lived at the top of a street which was just steps, well over a hundred of them. No good for a bike.
On a sunny and still day Wellington is extremely beautiful, on a windy winter's evening it is brutal. Can't imagine it now though. It wasn't my first time to live there.
The trouble with voting for the council and the also the Mayor was there's so many candidates and sifting through the book to work out who's who was an interesting challenge, especially when you'd been at it all week at the office then just the weekend for fixing the house or the garden. By then we moved out to the South Coast with those awesome views. On a clear day you could see the Southern Alps. I seem to remember Prentergast as Mayor and she was very good I believe.
Cheers Karl, thought you'd be back from time to time. Thanks.
Yes I Agree with Gaynor.
It is a great shame so many get sucked into this. It's such a waste.
And what do all City Planners prattle on about? "Amenity Values" and making the city a great place to work, live, visit and play! Shame they have never really considered the realities of cycleways when it comes to accessing businesses; steep hillside environments with many narrow streets and very limited off-street parking in a number of locations; and, more often than not, inclement windy weather. The proponents of such do so under a totally unquantified deluded belief that this will somehow improve our climate? As with many, I firmly believe this signal of "virtue" has not been worth it, but then sufficient people voted for the clowns that approved this? Which, of course, is the nub of Karl's post.
Karl, you're bang on re the problem of apathy. An old geezer Plato had it right when he said "The price of apathy is to be ruled by evil men."
Perhaps alongside "evil" one should put "stupid visionless." And of course 'men' should be people or idiots.
The choice of councillor candidates is sadly lacking. I think that is the reason people are not engaged. Each candidate more or less says the same thing in their marketing statements and once they get elected they are up against 'woke' Council staff who may have a different agenda.
Post a Comment