Pages

Thursday, March 27, 2025

Viv Forbes: The Growing Menace of Trees

Australia is threatened by dangerous trees. They have infested our cities, menace our power lines, invade our grasslands and fuel our worst bushfires.

The meander by Cyclone Alfred through south east Queensland illustrated how bad this danger has become.

Big tall trees smashed power lines and over 450,000 people lost power, some for days; big tall trees crushed cars and closed roads; and in every cyclone big tall trees fall on houses, shops and fences. 

Far too many of these trees damaged other people’s property; and far too often the owners of the trees will not foot the repair bills. People who harbour big tall trees should be held responsible for damage they do to neighbours or to public property. It needs a couple of claims for damages to focus minds.

And if some greenie with government power prevents a landowner from pruning an unsafe tree, that green bureaucrat should pay for all damages done by that feral tree.

To avoid damages claims big tall trees should be lopped to a height that does not endanger other people’s property.

Trees are also causing rural damage.

Our grasslands and open forests were once kept open and grassy by regular burning, first by aboriginals and later by graziers. Early explorers and colonists marvelled at those lovely weed-free grasslands.

Aboriginal burning was not a planned procedure – it was a result of their lifestyle. Fire was one of their greatest tools, used for warmth and cooking, for creating fresh new grass for marsupials which they hunted for food, for discouraging mosquitos and sand-flies and for inter-tribal wars. 

But starting a fire from scratch was tiresome and time consuming. They did not have a box of wax vestas in their dilly bag. So when the tribe travelled in search of food, one of the lubras was charged with the duty of keeping a flame alive. She carried a burning stick. When her fire-stick threatened to go out, she shoved it into a tussock of dry grass to rejuvenate its flames. Then she moved on, leaving the tussock burning. So lots of patches of grass were burnt, encouraging new growth, and attracting grazing marsupials whose protein was a valued aboriginal food. 

Abel Tasman mentioned the columns of smoke he saw in his voyages around Australia in the 1640’s.

Captain Cook noticed the smoke from many fires as he sailed up the East Coast of aboriginal Australia in 1770 – he even named “Smokey Cape” in NSW. He noted that the whole place seemed to be burning. 

This widespread burning by aboriginals discouraged trees and created the great treeless grasslands and open forests that existed when Europeans came. The early graziers also soon learned to use cool season burning to remove worthless dry grass and replace it by new green shoots as soon as the summer storms brought rain. They also collected dead branches and fallen trees for firewood, yard rails and posts.

However our grasslands and open forests are now being destroyed by ignorant green busybodies who prevent or delay burning and insist that dead wood is allowed to accumulate on the ground. There are fewer fires, but when they come they are unstoppable.

And there are too many “protected” parks and forests where grazing, hunting and collecting dead firewood is banned. These areas have become havens for weeds like lantana, groundsel, wait-a-while and prickly pear, and pests like wild cats, wild dogs, wild deer and wild pigs.

Many people have admired our beautiful eucalypt trees and too many have planted eucalypts in their own backyards. Seeds were sent to Kew Gardens in UK in 1774 and were soon also being propagated in places like Spain, Portugal, Italy, Morocco, California and South Africa. In Spain they were promoted for pulp production: “a fast- growing tree species producing abundant pulp in comparison with slow-growing oaks”.

But eucalypts pose a special fire danger – the beauty of “Blue Hills” arises when eucalyptus oils evaporate from the leaves of gum trees in hot sunshine. This vapour and fine dust in the air above the trees scatter the light producing the blue haze. But eucalyptus oil is highly flammable. Should lightning, arsonists or careless campers start a bushfire near a eucalypt forest on a hot afternoon, this gas will assist the fire to race through the tree tops. 

David Bowman, a forest ecologist at the University of Tasmania in Australia, had this to say about eucalypts:

"Looking at the eucalyptus forest outside my window in Tasmania, I see a gigantic fire hazard. On a really hot day, those things are going to burn like torches and shower our suburbs with sparks."

Once upon a time Australian landowners were obliged to keep their land free of eucalypt regrowth (it was a condition of their leases). Inspectors checked on them to ensure they were had cleared the land and were controlling suckers. 

Now landowners are the suckers - if woody weeds reach a certain size, they become protected native plants. Bureaucratic spies now use satellite data to catch landowners in illegal clearing. Soon the remaining grass is smothered and the land turns to worthless scrub harbouring weeds and animal pests. 

And a haven for fierce bushfires.

Viv Forbes is a scientist and pastoralist He and his wife have spent a lifetime learning how to raise healthy cattle, sheep, goats, poultry and pastures.

4 comments:

Robert Arthur said...

It has always intrigued me that there are strict suburban limits on building height near bounadries but not on tree or hedge height. It can be a protracted exercise to get a neighbour to reduce.
Decades ago when I was a boy sheep ruled in NZ and much of the country was realtively bare. I often reflect on the relative cover today... and the associated fire risk. Many holiday settlements seem as vulnerabe as los Angeles outer suburbs.

Allen said...

I live in an area that was developed around 35 years ago when it appears that consents included the need to plant trees. We now have Pohutukawa trees 6-7 M high lining the roads. They are now getting to the point where they starting to obstruct people's views , but much worse, their roots are approx. the same diameter a the canopy meaning they are about to interfere with the services running along the side of the road. Being a N.Z. native, the chances of getting them removed is pretty slim so we'll just have to put up with the inconvenience and cost of repairs for the next 150 years.
I wonder who's ball brained idea was it to plant trees that can grow to 20m in a residential development.

Anonymous said...

The reason why the recent Californian fires were so bad was that the gold miners of the 1860s planted eucalyptus for props in mines and related timber.
Then it was planted as an unsuccessful forest tree.
Fast forward 160 years, and the resulting wilding gums have become a disaster waiting for a spark.

Let's face it , nature found a balance between new growth and fires, and it's humans that find it terribly inconvenient.
Trees take in CO2, and either release it decaying on the ground, or burning in natural fires.

There is the same amount of carbon circulating today as millions of years ago.

Ewan McGregor said...

Well, the trees were here before we were, like a million years or so, in fact. But what the heck? Now that we've arrived, they're in the way, and have to go. Sad. What use are they anyway? Turns out that maybe it's quite a lot, actually. More than we realised. Best though, that we make sure that we plant or save the right tree in the rightplace.