There are lessons to be learned from what has happened to and in Iran. Without doubt there is more to be learned, and more will become apparent in the days, weeks, months, and years to come. One such lesson has been taught through history but is forgotten more often than remembered.
Appeasement, the attempt to avoid conflict and to maintain or restore peace, may sometimes be a virtue but is frequently capitulation to evil actors. Those who have the power but, for whatever reason, lack the inclination to stand up for what is right often find that visions of peace are a mere illusion or fabrication of the mind. They may find that the goodwill they thought to buy through appeasement is rewarded with aggression and the sacrifice of innocent victims to the whims of persons of authoritarian temperament who now have totalitarian power.
The international community ignored the subjugation of the Iranian people to the ideology of the mullahs, allowing the mullahs to increase their hold within the country’s institutions and to use them to brutalize those who voice opposition. Absence of any meaningful action over nearly 50 years has allowed the regime not only to trample on the human rights of the people but also to increase its military might to a point perceived to be an existential threat to Israel and the US itself. Only at this point has action has been taken and then not for the truly moral reason of stopping the human rights abuses but for fear of lethal aggression.
Had human rights been to the forefront, action would have been taken decades ago and, as an indirect consequence of asserting the rights of the Iranian people to their human rights, the threat to other nations would not have materialized.
The eyes of the world are now focused on Iran and the Gulf region. Too late for all those who have already died, and for those dying in the present conflagration, the world started to become more aware of the regime’s barbaric nature when in January reports started filtering out of tens of thousands being murdered in the streets. Seeking to be free from despotic demands for conformity with clerical edicts, and fearful for their economic and social wellbeing, protestors took to the streets and paid the ultimate price.
A far cry from New Zealand, without a doubt, but for too long, we in New Zealand have been putting our heads in the sand and ignoring the insidious infiltration of our institutions by idealogues who wish to create a ghetto where only their own voices are heard and contrary views are silenced.
If stands are not taken, the outcomes may eventually become dire. We already have zealots who consider it acceptable to deprive people of their livelihoods if they do not obey their demands for ‘education’ in matters of thought, conscience, religion and belief and in areas of contested opinion.
Iran is a terrible example of what can happen when a stand against evil is not taken. Evil can take various forms, and one thing may lead to another. We should guard against being seduced by our own decency, by our reluctance to accept that some of us may really want to curtail our freedom with impositions of authoritarian government and dictatorial demands.
Which leads me to National could signal its support for democracy where I said
Had human rights been to the forefront, action would have been taken decades ago and, as an indirect consequence of asserting the rights of the Iranian people to their human rights, the threat to other nations would not have materialized.
The eyes of the world are now focused on Iran and the Gulf region. Too late for all those who have already died, and for those dying in the present conflagration, the world started to become more aware of the regime’s barbaric nature when in January reports started filtering out of tens of thousands being murdered in the streets. Seeking to be free from despotic demands for conformity with clerical edicts, and fearful for their economic and social wellbeing, protestors took to the streets and paid the ultimate price.
A far cry from New Zealand, without a doubt, but for too long, we in New Zealand have been putting our heads in the sand and ignoring the insidious infiltration of our institutions by idealogues who wish to create a ghetto where only their own voices are heard and contrary views are silenced.
If stands are not taken, the outcomes may eventually become dire. We already have zealots who consider it acceptable to deprive people of their livelihoods if they do not obey their demands for ‘education’ in matters of thought, conscience, religion and belief and in areas of contested opinion.
Iran is a terrible example of what can happen when a stand against evil is not taken. Evil can take various forms, and one thing may lead to another. We should guard against being seduced by our own decency, by our reluctance to accept that some of us may really want to curtail our freedom with impositions of authoritarian government and dictatorial demands.
Which leads me to National could signal its support for democracy where I said
Leadership is needed. We need a Prime Minister who will say loudly and clearly what English said in 2003, expressing with strength of character and personality that it is the expectation of all members of the coalition government that all elements of the bureaucracy and other parts of government both central and local will cease undermining our democracy.
Whatever may be behind National’s reluctance to take a stand, its failure to do so is appeasement of those who are prepared to destroy our way of life -- in some cases, they may wish to do so -- by undermining the governmental structures which protect freedom and democracy.
Gary Judd KC is a King's Counsel, former Chairman of ASB and Ports of Auckland and former member APEC Business Advisory Council. Gary blogs at Gary Judd KC Substack where this article was sourced.
12 comments:
The politician who takes a clear stand on protecting NZ's democracy and roundly condemns the dangerous woke crowd will win the 2026 election. (If the PM did this, his lack of credibility would sink him.)
@anon 0329….the pm has already shown us his true colours when he said there was nothing he liked in the treaty principles bill….a bill that mirrored the original treaty in content, a bill that called for equal rights, protection of private property rights, and parliament (elected by the people) makes the laws.
If the PM doesn’t like that, and the media doesn’t like (which they clearly don’t) and the thousands of useful idiots who turned out in protest didn’t like it, then what?
We have a pm and system that appears to be geared towards preferential treatment of part maori people in all spheres of life, coupled with laws and a judiciary that no longer respect private property rights.
This is a recipe for disastrous outcomes.
Vote ACT (nz first is just a populist version of national)
Having read Gary Judd’s excellent analysis of the dangers of appeasement made me dive deeper into this issue of leadership vs Head of State.
“The distinction between Leadership and Head of State is a critical one, representing the difference between influencing people and holding formal authority. While a head of State often has the title of legal power, true leadership lies in the ability to inspire, guide, and build trust within a team of a nation.”
True leaders tower above bad actors that are merely Heads of State. If anyone remembers the demise of a once prosperous country called Rhodesia will remember the stoic leadership of Ian Smith. A man who demonstrated integrity and courage under fire winning the country’s trust. His efforts were in vain as the heads of state in South Africa, England and the USA misguidedly appeased the Marxist terrorists allowing them to destroy Rhodesia beyond recognition.
Exactly as I see it. Most people out protesting in the streets against the war have little grasp of the background to this war. They are oblivious to the thousands of Iranians killed as well as the Israelis on October 7th. To them this is just a blip on the screen.
I see a comparison here with our radical pro part-Maori agenda, forcing people to adhere to a certain mythical and cultural ideology. It is becoming fully embedded. I guess we will be like the Iranians who eventually had to flee the country or conform.
Apparently, around 2% of the wealth was in the hands of the Iranian IRGC supporters. People won't tolerate that situation here, although even now there seems little accountability where our tax money goes.
“If stands are not taken the outcomes eventually become dire” - this should be a stark warning to all. We have to remember that the price of our failure to recognise signs of extremism and address the reasons that precipitate it will be paid by our children.
My comment should read around 80% not 2% of the countries wealth. I was reading how much was controlled by the ordinary people(just a small percentage). The IRGC control over the countries economic assets is enormous . In comparison, we can't afford to let our water be controlled by a few IWI entities. We can't afford to have judicial power in the hands of ideological people.
Leadership is indeed needed. In 2016, for his own personal reasons Winston denied NZ the opportunity to have Bill English as PM. He gave us Ardern instead. Hard to ever forgive Winnie for that. Can’t help wondering occasionally where NZ might be now if Bill had become PM instead of Ardern… Little point in wondering, I know. “If wishes were horses beggars would ride” as the old saying goes.
50yrs we have been on this path in NZ. Most of the damage is structurally and conceptually in place. You can’t save what is already lost. The ship has sailed. You either live with the consequences of our actions, or you outright completely restructure NZ. You can’t slap a band aid on it and kiss it better.
The truth of the matter in the 2017 Elections, is that English's National, who had won the most seats, but needed a coalition partner... wouldn't entertain the principles that Winston was asking for... one of which was his long held wish to undo the harm caused by Legislation of the mid '70's by removing references to Waitangi Treaty 'Principles' that had crept into Acts and Laws. National baulked... they obviously wanted to carry on with the appeasement strategy. Labour and that commie Ardern made promises to Winston that they lied about and flaunted in his face... hence Winston's "I'll not be lied too twice!" statement. It is unbelievable that Labour, via Govt Depts, did all the drafting of He Puapua in secret from the Deputy Prime Minister... AND the public of NZ! There HAD to be bribery and corruption involved... not one whistleblower! Kept secret right through the 2020 elections! So we've now had nearly 3 Govt terms of appeasement to Maori demands, because of Bill English?
Thank you Jake. You fully understand the situation Bill English being to blame for Ardern being foisted on us all. So many wrongly blame Winston !!! [I was involved politically at that stage]. Nats... masters at APPEASEMENT.... as UK gummint in WWII.
Don’t forget the Nat’s elder statesman, Jimmy Bolger, aka Mr Appeasement, himself. I heard him speak at Waikato University in his days as Chancellor. At the end of his speech I almost thought he was going to tell the crowd to ‘Vote Labour’, so aligned was he with the co governance model, but one would have to be, wouldn’t they, to hold that position in Waikato University for as long as he did. His influence on National was there until his dying days.
It seems the first casualty in politics is the truth. Why haven't the facts about Bolger and English as listed in earlier comments been aired before? Sooo many skeletons in closets around Parliament!
Post a Comment
Thank you for joining the discussion. Breaking Views welcomes respectful contributions that enrich the debate. Please ensure your comments are not defamatory, derogatory or disruptive. We appreciate your cooperation.